Purchase one-time access:Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online access
One-time access price info
- For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
- For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'
Subscribe:Subscribe to American Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology
- Disparities in rates of unintended pregnancy in the United States, 1994 and 2001.Perspect Sex Reprod Health. 2006; 38: 90-96
- Contraceptive use among U.S. women having abortions in 2000-2001.Perspect Sex Reprod Health. 2002; 34: 294-303
- Factors associated with contraceptive choice and inconsistent method use, United States, 2004.Perspect Sex Reprod Health. 2008; 40: 94-104
- Fertility, family planning, and reproductive health of U.S. women: data from the 2002 National Survey of Family Growth.Natl Center Health Stat. 2005; 23: 95
- U.S. women's perceptions of and attitudes about the IUD.Obstet Gynecol Surv. 1996; 51: S30-S34
- Attitudes of women in Scotland to contraception: a qualitative study to explore the acceptability of long-acting methods.J Fam Plann Reprod Health Care. 2008; 34: 213-217
- Challenges in translating evidence to practice: the provision of intrauterine contraception.Obstet Gynecol. 2008; 111: 1359-1369
- Intrauterine contraception in Saint Louis: a survey of obstetrician and gynecologists' knowledge and attitudes.Contraception. 2010; 81: 112-116
- Cost effectiveness of contraceptives in the United States.Contraception. 2009; 79 (Erratum in: Contraception 2009;80:2229-30): 5-14
- Initiation of oral contraceptives—start now!.J Adolesc Health. 2008; 43: 432-436
- Initiation of oral contraceptives using a quick start compared with a conventional start: a randomized controlled trial.Obstet Gynecol. 2007; 109: 1270-1276
- Quick start: novel oral contraceptive initiation method.Contraception. 2002; 66: 141-145
- A modified poisson regression approach to prospective studies with binary data.Am J Epidemiol. 2004; 159: 702-706
- Obstetrician-gynecologists and the intrauterine device: a survey of attitudes and practice.Obstet Gynecol. 2002; 99: 275-280
- Adolescent and young adult women's knowledge of and attitudes toward the intrauterine device.Contraception. 2008; 78: 211-217
- A comparison of contraceptive procurement pre- and post-benefit change.Contraception. 2007; 76: 360-365
- Increasing intrauterine contraception use by reducing barriers to post-abortal and interval insertion.Contraception. 2008; 78: 136-142
- A randomized trial of the intrauterine contraceptive device vs hormonal contraception in women who are infected with the human immunodeficiency virus.Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2007; 197: 144.e1-144.e8
Supported by an anonymous foundation. This research was also supported in part by a Midcareer Investigator Award in Women's Health Research ( K24 HD01298 ), by a Clinical and Translational Science Award ( UL1RR024992 ), and by Grant no. KL2RR024994 from the National Center for Research Resources (NCRR), a component of the National Institutes of Health (NIH) and NIH Roadmap for Medical Research .
Reprints not available from the authors.
The contents of this article are solely the responsibility of the authors and do not necessarily represent the official view of NCRR or NIH.
Cite this article as: Secura GM, Allsworth JE, Madden T, et al. The Contraceptive CHOICE Project: reducing barriers to long-acting reversible contraception. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2010;203:115.e1-7.