Advertisement

Deep loop excision for prehysterectomy endocervical evaluation

      Abstract

      OBJECTIVE: Our purpose was to determine whether office deep loop excision should replace cone biopsy for frozen-section endocervical evaluation before planned hysterectomy. STUDY DESIGN: This cohort study comprised 31 patients who underwent office deep loop excision with frozen-section analysis followed by hysterectomy and 50 historic controls who underwent cone biopsy with frozen-section analysis followed by hysterectomy. Diagnostic accuracy, margin status, presence of residual disease, morbidity, and cost were compared. RESULTS: Loop excision frozen sections had sensitivity (ectocervical specimen, 96%; deepest endocervical specimen, 93%), specificity (100%, 86%), and positive (100%, 88%) and negative (75%, 92%) predictive values similar to those of frozen cone biopsy (95%, 80%, 98%, and 67%, respectively). No differences in margin status, presence of residual dysplasia, or morbidity were observed. The shorter operating room time for vaginal hysterectomy after loop excision (p < 0.01) resulted in an approximate $2000 savings. CONCLUSION: Office loop excision is a cost-effective option for endocervical evaluation before planned hysterectomy. (Am J Obstet Gynecol 1997;176:82-6.)

      Keywords

      To read this article in full you will need to make a payment

      Purchase one-time access:

      Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online access
      One-time access price info
      • For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
      • For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'

      Subscribe:

      Subscribe to American Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology
      Already a print subscriber? Claim online access
      Already an online subscriber? Sign in
      Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect

      References

        • Rutledge F
        • Ibanez ML.
        Use of the cryostat in gynecologic surgery.
        Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1962; 83: 1208-1213
        • Dutra FR
        • Clement ED
        • Fischer RG.
        Frozen tissue sections of uterine cervical cones in the management of patients with positive vaginal cytologic smears.
        Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1962; 84: 101-106
        • Guerriero WF
        • Cox R
        • Tillery W
        • Race GJ.
        Clinical value of the cryostat frozen section in the diagnosis of cervical carcinoma.
        Obstet Gynecol. 1964; 24: 61-65
        • DiMusto JC.
        Reliability of frozen sections in gynecologic surgery.
        Obstet Gynecol. 1970; 35: 235-240
        • Greenberg SD
        • Kaufman RH.
        Use of the cryostat in diagnosis with frozen sections of specimens from cervical conization.
        Am J Clin Pathol. 1963; 40: 500-507
        • Kaufman RH
        • Abbott JP
        • Scheihing WC.
        Use of the refrigerated microtome for rapid diagnosis of cervical conization specimens.
        Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1962; 84: 107-112
        • Woodruff JD
        • Baggish MS
        • Kooyman DB.
        The cryostat cone for rapid diagnosis in carcinoma of the uterine cervix.
        Md Med J. 1970; 19: 64-68
        • Elkins TE
        • Gallup DG
        • Slomka CV
        • Phelan JP.
        Postoperative morbidity in cases of cervical conization followed by vaginal hysterectomy.
        South Med J. 1982; 75: 264-266
        • Hoffman MS
        • Collins E
        • Roberts WS
        • Fiorica JV
        • Gunasekaran S
        • Cavanagh D.
        Cervical conization with frozen section before planned hysterectomy.
        Obstet Gynecol. 1993; 82: 394-398