The case for trial of labor in the patient with a prior low-segment vertical cesarean incision


      OBJECTIVE: Our purpose was to review recent obstetric literature detailing the subsequent delivery experience of patients with a prior low-segment vertical cesarean incision and to derive recommendations for practice on the basis of this information. STUDY DESIGN: Ten studies that included information about pregnancy outcome in patients with prior low-segment vertical cesarean operations were retrieved and reviewed from the American obstetric literature since 1981 and from a review of all abstracts presented annually since 1981 to the Society of Perinatal Obstetricians. RESULTS: Altogether, information about subsequent pregnancy outcome for 382 patients with prior low-segment vertical cesarean delivery was available for analysis. Among the 372 patients with complete patient population information, vaginal delivery was safely accomplished in 306 (82%). Four uterine ruptures (1.05%) have been reported, only one of which occurred after a single prior unextended low-segment vertical cesarean incision. Two ruptures occurred elsewhere on the lateral or posterior aspect of the uterus in subsequent pregnancies, and the fourth rupture occurred at the juncture of prior low vertical and transverse incisions. No perinatal mortality or permanent perinatal morbidity was encountered with these pregnancies. CONCLUSIONS: In the otherwise uncomplicated pregnancy the patient with one previous nonextended low-segment vertical cesarean incision should be considered to have a prior low-segment scar and as such be a candidate for trial of labor in her current singleton pregnancy. The same care, counseling, and caution should be exercised for this patient as for one with a prior low-segment transverse incision.(Am J Obstet Gynecol 1997;177:144-8)


      To read this article in full you will need to make a payment

      Purchase one-time access:

      Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online access
      One-time access price info
      • For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
      • For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'


      Subscribe to American Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology
      Already a print subscriber? Claim online access
      Already an online subscriber? Sign in
      Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect


        • Coakley JW.
        Caesarean section twice in one person.
        JAMA. 1896; 26: 720-722
        • National Institutes of Health
        NIH consensus development statement on cesarean childbirth.
        Obstet Gynecol. 1981; 57: 537-545
        • American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists Committee on Obstetric Practice
        Vaginal delivery after a previous cesarean birth.
        American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists, Washington1997 (Technical Bulletin No.:143)
        • Kroenig B.
        Transperitonealer cervikaler kaiserschnitt.
        in: Operative Gynaekologie. Georg Thieme, Leipzig1912: 870
        • Gabert HA
        • Bey M.
        History and development of cesarean operation.
        Obstet Gynecol Clin North Am. 1988; 15: 591-605
        • Roberts LJ
        • Beardsworth SA
        • Trew G.
        Labour following caesarean section: current practice in the United Kingdom.
        Br J Obstet Gynaecol. 1994; 101: 153-155
        • Beall M
        • Eglinton GS
        • Clark SL
        • Phelan JP.
        Vaginal delivery after cesarean section in women with unknown types of uterine scar.
        J Reprod Med. 1984; 29: 31-35
        • Schutterman EB
        • Grimes DA.
        Comparative safety of the low transverse versus the low vertical uterine incision for cesarean delivery of breech infants.
        Obstet Gynecol. 1983; 61: 593-597
        • Martin Jr, JN
        • Harris BA
        • Huddleston JF
        • Morrison JC
        • Propst MG
        • Wiser WL
        • et al.
        Vaginal delivery following previous cesarean birth.
        Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1983; 146: 255-263
        • Stovall TG
        • Shaver DC
        • Solomon SK
        • Anderson GD.
        Trial of labor in previous cesarean section patients, excluding classical cesarean sections.
        Obstet Gynecol. 1987; 70: 713-717
        • Pruett KM
        • Kirshon B
        • Cotton DB
        • Poindexter III., AN
        Is vaginal birth after two or more cesarean sections safe?.
        Obstet Gynecol. 1988; 72: 163-165
        • Pruett KM
        • Kirshon B
        • Cotton DB.
        Unknown uterine scar and trial of labor.
        Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1988; 159: 807-810
        • Holland JB
        • Dupre AR
        • Blake PG
        • Martin RW
        • Martin Jr., JN
        Trial of labor after cesarean delivery: experience in the non-university level II regional hospital setting.
        Obstet Gynecol. 1992; 79: 936-939
        • Naef RW
        • Ray MA
        • Chauhan SP
        • Roach H
        • Blake PG
        • Martin Jr., JN
        Trial of labor after cesarean delivery with a lower-segment, vertical uterine incision: is it safe?.
        Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1995; 172: 1666-1674
        • Adair CD
        • Sanchez-Ramos L
        • Whitaker D
        • McDyer DC
        • Farah L
        • Briones D.
        Trial of labor in patients with a previous lower uterine vertical cesarean section.
        Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1996; 174: 966-970
        • Cowan RK
        • Kinch RAH
        • Ellis E
        • Anderson R.
        Trial of labor following cesarean delivery.
        Obstet Gynecol. 1994; 83: 933-936
        • Warsof SL
        • Nobles G
        • Abramowicz JS
        • Sayegh S
        • Levy DL.
        Vaginal birth after vertical cesarean section.
        in: Proceedings of the Ninth Annual Meeting of the Society of Perinatal Obstetricians; 1989 Feb 1-4; New Orleans, Louisiana The Society, New Orleans1989
        • Flamm BL
        • Goings JR
        • Liu Y
        • Wolde-Tsadik G.
        Elective repeat cesarean delivery versus trial of labor: a prospective multicenter study.
        Obstet Gynecol. 1994; 83: 927-932
        • Rosen MG
        • Dickinson JC
        • Westhoff CL.
        Vaginal birth after cesarean: a meta-analysis of morbidity and mortality.
        Obstet Gynecol. 1991; 77: 465-470
        • Miller DA
        • Diaz FG
        • Paul RH.
        Vaginal birth after cesarean: a 10-year experience.
        Obstet Gynecol. 1994; 84: 255-258
        • Scott JR.
        Mandatory trial of labor after cesarean delivery: an alternative viewpoint.
        Obstet Gynecol. 1991; 77: 811-814
        • Nielson TF
        • Ljungblad U
        • Hagberg H.
        Rupture and dehiscence of cesarean section scar during pregnancy and delivery.
        Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1989; 160: 569-573
        • Novas J
        • Myers SA
        • Gleicher N.
        Obstetric outcome of patients with more than one previous cesarean section.
        Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1989; 160: 364-367
        • Petrikovsky BM.
        Rupture of the scarred uterus: prediction and diagnosis.
        Lancet. 1996; 347: 838-839
        • Pitkin RM.
        Once a cesarean?.
        Obstet Gynecol. 1991; 77 ([editorial]): 939