Advertisement

Endometrial resection versus vaginal hysterectomy for menorrhagia: Long-term clinical and quality-of-life outcomes

      Abstract

      OBJECTIVE: Our purpose was to compare patients' satisfaction with the effect of treatment, health-related quality of life, psychologic status, and sexual functioning 2 years after endometrial resection or vaginal hysterectomy for menorrhagia. STUDY DESIGN: Menorrhagic women ≤50 years old with a mobile uterus smaller than a 12-week pregnancy were enrolled in a randomized trial to compare endometrial resection and vaginal hysterectomy. Two years after surgery the women were requested to rate the degree of satisfaction with the effect of the operation and to complete the Short Form 36 general health survey questionnaire, the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale, and the revised Sabbatsberg Sexual Rating Scale. RESULTS: Forty-one subjects underwent endometrial resection and 44 underwent vaginal hysterectomy without major complications. Of the 77 women attending the 2-year follow-up visit, 33 of 38 (86.8%) in the endometrial resection arm were very satisfied or satisfied with the treatment compared with 37 of 39 (94.8%) of those in the hysterectomy arm. According to the Short Form 36 questionnaire, social functioning and vitality scores were significantly better in the hysterectomy group than in the resection group. Significantly lower Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale anxiety scores were observed in the former than in the latter subjects. The Sabbatsberg Sexual Rating Scale scores were similar in the two groups. CONCLUSIONS: In patients requiring surgical treatment for menorrhagia vaginal hysterectomy appeared slightly more satisfying and offered a better health-related quality of life than did endometrial resection at 2-year follow-up. Hysterectomy did not adversely affect psychologic status and sexual functioning. (Am J Obstet Gynecol 1997;177:95-101)

      Keywords

      To read this article in full you will need to make a payment

      Purchase one-time access:

      Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online access
      One-time access price info
      • For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
      • For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'

      Subscribe:

      Subscribe to American Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology
      Already a print subscriber? Claim online access
      Already an online subscriber? Sign in
      Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect

      References

        • DeCherney AH
        • Diamond MP
        • Lavy G
        • Polan ML.
        Endometrial ablation for intractable uterine bleeding: hysteroscopic resection.
        Obstet Gynecol. 1987; 70: 668-670
        • Magos AL
        • Baumann R
        • Lockwood GM
        • Turnbull AC.
        Experience with the first 250 endometrial resections for menorrhagia.
        Lancet. 1991; 337: 1074-1078
        • Gannon MJ
        • Holt EM
        • Fairbank J
        • Fitzgerald M
        • Milne MA
        • Crystal AM
        • et al.
        A randomised trial comparing endometrial resection and abdominal hysterectomy for the treatment of menorrhagia.
        BMJ. 1991; 303: 1362-1364
        • Dwyer N
        • Hutton J
        • Stirrat GM.
        Randomised controlled trial comparing endometrial resection with abdominal hysterectomy for the surgical treatment of menorrhagia.
        Br J Obstet Gynaecol. 1993; 100: 237-243
        • Pinion SB
        • Parkin DE
        • Abramovich DR
        • Naji A
        • Alexander DA
        • Russel IT
        • et al.
        Randomised trial of hysterectomy, endometrial laser ablation, and transcervical endometrial resection for dysfunctional uterine bleeding.
        BMJ. 1994; 309: 979-983
        • Sculpher MJ
        • Dwyer N
        • Byford S
        • Stirrat GM.
        Randomised trial comparing hysterectomy and transcervical endometrial resection: effect on health related quality of life and costs two years after surgery.
        Br J Obstet Gynaecol. 1996; 103: 142-149
        • Lumsden MA.
        Audit of transcervical endometrial ablation.
        Br J Obstet Gynaecol. 1995; 102: 87-89
        • Scottish Hysteroscopy Audit Group
        A Scottish audit of hysteroscopic surgery for menorrhagia: complications and follow up.
        Br J Obstet Gynaecol. 1995; 102: 249-254
        • Broadbent JAM
        • Magos AL.
        Endometrial resection: results and complications.
        in: Endometrial ablation. Churchill Livingstone, Edinburgh1993: 115-131
        • Kovac SR.
        Guidelines to determine the route of hysterectomy.
        Obstet Gynecol. 1995; 85: 18-23
        • Richards DH.
        A post-hysterectomy syndrome.
        Lancet. 1974; 2: 983-985
        • Alexander DA
        • Naji AA
        • Pinion SB
        • Mollison J
        • Kitchener HC
        • Parkin DE
        • et al.
        Randomised trial comparing hysterectomy with endometrial ablation for dysfunctional uterine bleeding: psychiatric and psychosocial aspects.
        BMJ. 1996; 312: 280-284
        • Goldstein SR
        • Horii SC
        • Snyder JR
        • Raghavendra N
        • Subramanyam B.
        Estimation of nongravid uterine volume based on a nomogram of gravid uterine volume: its value in gynecologic uterine abnormalities.
        Obstet Gynecol. 1988; 72: 86-90
        • Thompson JD.
        Hysterectomy.
        in: 7th ed. Te Linde's operative gynecology. Lippincott, Philadelphia1992: 663-738
        • Ware JE
        • Sherbourne CD
        The MOS 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36), I: conceptual framework and item selection.
        Med Care. 1992; 30: 473-483
        • McHorney CA
        • Ware JE
        • Raczek AE
        The MOS 36-Item Short Form Health Survey (SF-36), II: psychometric and clinical tests of validity in measuring physical and mental health constructs.
        Med Care. 1993; 31: 247-263
        • Aaronson NK
        • Acquadro C
        • Alonso J
        • Apolone G
        • Bucquet D
        • Bullinger M
        • et al.
        International quality of life assessment (IQOLA) project.
        Qual Life Res. 1992; 1: 349-351
        • Ware JE
        • Gandek BL
        • Keller SD
        • IQOLA Project Group
        Evaluating instruments used cross-nationally: methods from the IQOLA Project.
        in: 2nd ed. Quality of life and pharmacoeconomics in clinical trials. Lippincott-Raven, Philadelphia1996: 681-692
        • Apolone G
        • Mosconi P
        The Italian SF-36 health survey: translation, validation and norming from a clinical epidemiology perspective.
        J Clin Epidemiol. 1996; (In press)
        • Zigmond AS
        • Snaith RP
        The Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale.
        Acta Psychiatr Scand. 1983; 67: 361-370
        • Garrat AM
        • Torgerson DJ
        • Wyness J
        • Hall MH
        • Reid DM.
        Measuring sexual functioning in premenopausal women.
        Br J Obstet Gynaecol. 1995; 102: 311-316
        • Breslow NE
        • Day NE.
        Statistical methods in cancer research: the analysis of case-control studies.
        in: International Agency for Research on Cancer, Lyon1980: 123-146 (Scientific Publication No. 32)
        • Drife J.
        Conserving the cervix at hysterectomy.
        Br J Obstet Gynaecol. 1994; 101: 563-564
        • Brumsted JR
        • Blackman JA
        • Badger GJ
        • Riddick DH.
        Hysteroscopy versus hysterectomy for the treatment of abnormal uterine bleeding: a comparison of cost.
        Fertil Steril. 1996; 65: 310-316
        • Vilos GA
        • Pispidikis JT
        • Botz CK.
        Economic evaluation of hysteroscopic endometrial ablation versus vaginal hysterectomy for menorrhagia.
        Obstet Gynecol. 1996; 88: 241-245