The Preterm Prediction Study: Association of cesarean delivery with increases in maternal weight and body mass index


      Objective: Our purpose was to evaluate whether maternal weight and body mass index measured either before or during pregnancy are associated with an increased risk of cesarean delivery. Study design: Maternal weight and height were prospectively collected on 2929 women in the National Institutes of Health Maternal-Fetal Medicine Units Network Preterm Prediction Study. Prepregnancy and 27- to 31-week maternal weight and height were used to calculate the body mass index, and its contribution to the risk of cesarean delivery was determined. Women with prenatally diagnosed congenital anomalies (n = 89) and pregestational diabetes (n = 31) were excluded from analysis. Results: Univariate analysis of risk factors for cesarean delivery in the 2809 eligible women revealed a decreased risk of cesarean delivery with maternal age <18 years and multiparity; increased risk of cesarean delivery was noted with maternal age >35 years and a male fetus. Increases in either prepregnancy or 27- to 31-week maternal weight (5-pound units) or body mass index (1.0 kg/m2 units) were significantly associated with an increased odds of cesarean delivery (p = 0.0001). Each unit increase in prepregnancy or 27- to 31-week body mass index resulted in a parallel increase in the odds of cesarean delivery of 7.0% and 7.8%, respectively. Multivariable stepwise logistic regression analysis confirmed the association of male fetus, age, nulliparity, and body mass index as significant variables contributing to cesarean delivery risk. Conclusions: The risk of cesarean delivery is associated with incremental changes in maternal weight and body mass index before and during pregnancy after adjustment for potential confounding factors. Prepregnancy counseling about optimizing maternal weight and monitoring weight gain during pregnancy to decrease the risk of cesarean delivery are supported by this study. (Am J Obstet Gynecol 1997;177:333-41.)


      To read this article in full you will need to make a payment

      Purchase one-time access:

      Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online access
      One-time access price info
      • For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
      • For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'


      Subscribe to American Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology
      Already a print subscriber? Claim online access
      Already an online subscriber? Sign in
      Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect


        • Peipert JF
        • Bracken MB
        Maternal age: an independent risk factor for cesarean delivery.
        Obstet Gynecol. 1993; 81: 200-205
        • Gould JB
        • Davey B
        • Stafford RS
        Socioeconomic differences in rates of cesarean section.
        N Engl J Med. 1989; 321: 233-239
        • Goyert GL
        • Bottoms SF
        • Treadwell MC
        • Nehra PC
        The physician factor in cesarean birth rates.
        N Engl J Med. 1989; 320: 706-709
        • Erkblad U
        • Grenman S
        Maternal weight, weight gain during pregnancy, and pregnancy outcome.
        Int J Gynecol Obstet. 1992; 39: 277-283
        • Edwards LE
        • Hellerstedt WL
        • Alton IR
        • Story M
        • Himes JH
        Pregnancy complications and birth outcomes in obese and normal-weight women: effects of gestational weight change.
        Obstet Gynecol. 1996; 87: 389-394
        • Bernstein IM
        • Catalano PM
        Examination of factors contributing to the risk of cesarean delivery in women with gestational diabetes.
        Obstet Gynecol. 1994; 83: 4662-4665
        • Thorp JA
        • Eckert LO
        • Ang MS
        • Johnston DA
        • Peaceman AM
        • Parisi VM
        Epidural analgesia and cesarean section for dystocia: risk factors in nulliparas.
        Am J Perinatol. 1991; 8: 402-410
        • Satin AJ
        • Maberry MC
        • Leveno KJ
        • Sherman ML
        • Kline DM
        Chorioamnionitis: a harbinger of dystocia.
        Obstet Gynecol. 1992; 79: 913-915
        • Institute of Medicine Subcommittee on Nutritional Status and Weight Gain During Pregnancy
        Nutrition during pregnancy.
        National Academy Press, Washington1990
        • Wolfe HM
        • Zador IE
        • Gross TL
        • Martier SS
        • Sokol RJ
        The clinical utility of maternal body mass index in pregnancy.
        Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1991; 164: 1306-1310
        • Susser M
        Review of dietary behaviour during pregnancy.
        in: Maternal nutrition in pregnancy: eating for two? Academic Press, London1981: 64-65
        • Cummings HH
        Interpretation of weight change during pregnancy.
        Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1934; 27: 808-815
        • Hellman I
        • Jackson E
        Weight relationships in pregnancy.
        Obstet Gynecol Surv. 1968; : 1003-1025
        • Institute of Medicine, National Academy of Sciences, Food and Nutrition Board
        Nutrition during pregnancy, I: weight gain; II: nutrient supplements.
        National Academy Press, Washington1990
      1. Public Health Rep. 1990; 105: 24-28
        • Johnson J
        • Longmate JA
        • Fretzen B
        Excessive maternal weight and pregnancy outcome.
        Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1992; 167: 353-372
        • Witter F
        • Caulfield L
        • Stoltzfus R
        Influence of maternal anthropometric status and birth weight on the risk of cesarean delivery.
        Obstet Gynecol. 1995; 85: 947-950
        • Johnson J
        • Yancey M
        A critique of the new recommendations for weight gain in pregnancy.
        Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1996; 174: 254-258