Predicting birth weight by fetal upper-arm volume with use of three-dimensional ultrasonography


      Objective: Our purpose was to determine the usefulness and accuracy of the three-dimensional ultrasonography assessed fetal upper-arm volume in predicting birth weight. Study design: From June 1996 to October 1996, we performed a prospective study of ultrasonography on 105 pregnant women without fetal structural anomaly or aneuploidy. Both the traditional two-dimensional ultrasonographic parameters and three-dimensional ultrasonography for fetal upper arm volume were measured within 48 hours of delivery. Results: The upper arm volume correlated well with birth weight (r = 0.92, n = 105, p < 0.0001). With use of linear and polynomial regression, we obtained a best-fit new formula, Birth weight = 1088.60 + 36.024 × Upper-arm volume. The accuracy of this new formula is compared with that of two Chinese equations predicting fetal weight reported before and other formulas commonly used in the world as well. Our formula is more accurate in predicting birth weight than all the other formulas by traditional two-dimensional ultrasonography, either in error, percentage error, or absolute error. Another group by prospective validation further proved this finding. Conclusion: The upper-arm volume assessed by three-dimensional ultrasonography can accurately predict birth weight, and its accuracy is superior to the previous formulas. Our study has at least validated the application of upper-arm volume by three-dimensional ultrasonography in estimating fetal weight. Further larger series are needed to confirm our findings.


      To read this article in full you will need to make a payment

      Purchase one-time access:

      Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online access
      One-time access price info
      • For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
      • For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'


      Subscribe to American Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology
      Already a print subscriber? Claim online access
      Already an online subscriber? Sign in
      Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect


        • Warsof SL
        • Gohan P
        • Berkowitz RL
        • Hobbins JC.
        The estimation of fetal weight by computer-assisted analysis.
        Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1977; 128: 881-892
        • Hadlock FP
        • Harrist RB
        • Shearman RS
        • Deter RL
        • Park SK.
        Estimation of fetal weight with the use of head, body and femur measurements: a prospective study.
        Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1985; 151: 333-337
        • Thurnau GR
        • Tamura RK
        • Sabbaga R
        • Depp III, OR
        • Dyer A
        • Larkin R
        • et al.
        A simple estimated fetal weight equation based on real-time ultrasound measurements of fetuses less than thirty-four weeks' gestation.
        Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1983; 145: 557-561
        • Hirata GI
        • Medearis AL
        • Horenstein J
        • Bear MB
        • Plait LD.
        Ultrasonographic estimation of fetal weight in the clinically macrosomic fetus.
        Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1990; 162: 238-242
        • Hsieh FJ
        • Chang FM
        • Huang HC
        • Lu CC
        • Ko TM
        • Chen HY.
        Computer-assisted analysis for prediction of fetal weight by ultrasound: comparison of biparietal diameter, abdominal circumference and femur length.
        J Formosan Med Assoc. 1987; 86: 957-964
        • Jeanty P
        • Romero R
        • Hobbins JC.
        Fetal limb volume: a new parameter to assess fetal growth and nutrition.
        J Ultrasound Med. 1985; 4: 273-282
        • Warda A
        • Deter RL
        • Duncan G
        • Hadlock FP.
        Evaluation of fetal thigh circumference measurements: a comparative ultrasound and anatomical study.
        J Clin Ultrasound. 1986; 14: 99-103
        • Vintzileos AM
        • Campbell WA
        • Rodis JF
        • Bors-Koefoed R
        • Nochimson DJ.
        Fetal weight estimation formulas with head, abdominal, femur and thigh circumference measurements.
        Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1987; 157: 410-414
        • Favre R
        • Nisand G
        • Bettahar K
        • Grange G
        • Nisand I.
        Measurement of limb circumferences with three-dimensional ultrasound for fetal weight estimation.
        Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 1993; 3: 176-179
        • Favre R
        • Bader AM
        • Nisand G.
        Prospective study on fetal weight estimation using limb circumferences obtained by three-dimensional ultrasound.
        Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 1995; 6: 140-144
        • Sood AK
        • Yancey M
        • Richards D.
        Prediction of fetal macrosomia using humeral soft tissue thickness.
        Obstet Gynecol. 1995; 85: 937-940
        • Kuo HC
        • Chang FM
        • Wu CH
        • Yao BL
        • Liu CH.
        The primary application of three-dimensional ultrasonography in obstetrics.
        Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1992; 166: 880-886
        • Kyei-Mensah A
        • Zaidi J
        • Pittrof R
        • Shaker A
        • Campbell S
        • Tan SL.
        Transvaginal three-dimensional ultrasound: accuracy of follicular volume measurements.
        Fertil Steril. 1996; 65: 371-376
        • Riccabona M
        • Nelson TR
        • Pretorius DH
        • Davidson TE.
        In vivo three-dimensional sonographic measurement of organ volume: validation in the urinary bladder.
        J Ultrasound Med. 1996; 15: 627-632
        • Nosir YFM
        • Fioretti PM
        • Vletter WB
        • Boersma E
        • Salustri A
        • Postma JT
        • et al.
        Accurate measurement of left ventricular ejection fraction by three-dimensional echocardiography: a comparison with radionuclide angiography.
        Circulation. 1996; 94: 460-466
        • King DL
        • King Jr, DL
        • Shao MY-C.
        Evaluation of in vitro measurement accuracy of a three-dimensional ultrasound scanner.
        J Ultrasound Med. 1991; 10: 77-82
        • Callen PW.
        Ultrasonography in obstetrics and gynecology.
        in: Saunders, Philadelphia1983: 25-33
        • Campbell S
        • Wilkin D.
        Ultrasonic measurement of the fetal abdominal circumference in estimation of fetal weight.
        Br J Obstet Gynaecol. 1975; 82: 689-697
        • Nelson TR
        • Pretorius DH
        • Sklansky M
        • Hagen-Ansert S.
        Three-dimensional echocardiographic evaluation of fetal heart anatomy and function: acquisition, analysis, and display.
        J Ultrasound Med. 1996; 15: 1-9
        • Pretorius DH
        • Nelson TR.
        Prenatal visualization of cranial sutures and fontanelles with three-dimensional ultrasonography.
        J Ultrasound Med. 1994; 13: 871-876
        • Ploeckinger-Ulm B
        • Ulm MR
        • Lee A
        • Kratochwil A
        • Bernaschek G.
        Antenatal depiction of fetal digits with three-dimensional ultrasonography.
        Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1996; 175: 571-574
        • Pretorius DH
        • Nelson TR.
        Fetal face visualization using three-dimensional ultrasonography.
        J Ultrasound Med. 1995; 14: 349-356
        • Lee A
        • Kratochwil A
        • Stumpflen I
        • Deutinger J
        • Bernaschek G.
        Fetal lung volume determination by three-dimensional ultrasonography.
        Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1996; 175: 588-592
        • Chang FM
        • Hsu KF
        • Ko HC
        • Yao BL
        • Chang CH
        • Yu CH
        • Chen HY.
        Three-dimensional ultrasound in the assessment of fetal liver volume: a comparison of reproducibility with two-dimensional ultrasound and a search for a volume constant.
        Ultrasound Med Biol. 1997; 23: 381-389
        • Chang FM
        • Hsu KF
        • Ko HC
        • Yao BL
        • Chang CH
        • Yu CH
        • et al.
        Fetal heart volume assessment by three-dimensional ultrasound.
        Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 1997; 9: 42-48