Correlation between cervical cytologic results and Gram stain as diagnostic tests for bacterial vaginosis


      Objective: Our purpose was to determine the reliability of the Papanicolaou smear in making the diagnosis of bacterial vaginosis with the vaginal Gram stain used as the diagnostic standard. Study design: We conducted a prospective, blinded, cross-sectional study of 210 consecutive patients referred to the Colposcopy Clinic for evaluation of abnormal cervical cytologic results. Each patient had a standard Papanicolaou smear and Gram stain of vaginal discharge. The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value of the Papanicolaou smear were determined with the Gram stain used as the standard for diagnosis of bacterial vaginosis. Results: Of the 210 patients, 80 (38.1%) had Gram stains that were positive for bacterial vaginosis and 118 (56.2%) had negative Gram stains. Twelve (5.7%) had intermediate Gram stains that were also considered negative. Of the 80 patients with positive Gram stains, 44 had cervical smears consistent with bacterial vaginosis and 36 had negative smears. Of the 130 patients with negative Gram stains, two had a positive cervical smear. Therefore, compared to the Gram stain, cervical cytologic test results had a sensitivity of 55% and a specificity of 98%. The respective positive predictive and negative predictive values were 96% and 78%. Conclusion: Compared to Gram stain of vaginal secretions, the cervical Papanicolaou smear has fair sensitivity (55%) and excellent positive predictive value (96%) in diagnosing bacterial vaginosis.


      To read this article in full you will need to make a payment

      Purchase one-time access:

      Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online access
      One-time access price info
      • For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
      • For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'


      Subscribe to American Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology
      Already a print subscriber? Claim online access
      Already an online subscriber? Sign in
      Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect


        • Thomason JL
        • Gelbart SM
        • Scaglione NJ.
        Bacterial vaginosis: current review with indications for asymptomatic therapy.
        Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1991; 165: 1210-1217
        • Clark P
        • Kurtzer T
        • Duff P.
        Role of bacterial vaginosis in peripartum infections.
        Infect Dis Obstet Gynecol. 1994; 2: 179-183
        • Amsel R
        • Totten PA
        • Spiegel CA
        • Chen KC
        • Eschenbach D
        • Holmes KK.
        Nonspecific vaginitis: diagnostic criteria and microbial and epidemiologic associations.
        Am J Med. 1983; 74: 14-22
        • Spiegel CA
        • Amsel R
        • Holmes KK.
        Diagnosis of bacterial vaginosis by direct Gram stain of vaginal fluid.
        J Clin Microbiol. 1983; 18: 170-177
        • Nugent RP
        • Krohn MA
        • Hillier SL.
        Reliability of diagnosing bacterial vaginosis is improved by a standardized method of Gram stain interpretation.
        J Clin Microbiol. 1991; 29: 297-301
        • Schwebke JR
        • Hillier SL
        • Sobel JD
        • McGregor JA
        • Sweet RL.
        Validity of the vaginal Gram stain for the diagnosis of bacterial vaginosis.
        Obstet Gynecol. 1996; 88: 573-576
        • Platz-Christensen J-J
        • Larsson P-G
        • Sundstrom E
        • Bondeson L.
        Detection of bacterial vaginosis in Papanicolaou smears.
        Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1989; 160: 132-133
      1. Current Issues. The 1991 Bethesda System for reporting cervical/vaginal cytological diagnosis.
        Diagnostic Cytopathol. 1993; 9: 235-243
        • Hillier SL.
        Diagnostic microbiology of bacterial vaginosis.
        Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1993; 169: 455-459
        • American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists Committee on Technical Bulletins
        Vaginitis. The College, Washington1996 Jul (Technical Bulletin No.: 226)