Advertisement

The accuracy of intrapartum ultrasonographic fetal weight estimation in diabetic pregnancies

      Abstract

      Objective: Our purpose was to compare the accuracy of ultrasonographic fetal weight estimation in pregnant diabetic women with that of matched nondiabetic controls. Study design: We performed a case-control study of pregnant patients who underwent ultrasonographic fetal weight estimation within 3 days of delivery. The study group consisted of pregnant diabetic women and nondiabetic controls matched for maternal body mass index and neonatal birth weight. Fetal weight estimates were calculated with use of Hadlock's and Shepard's formulas. The difference between ultrasonographic fetal weight estimation and actual birth weight (absolute percent error) was analyzed with respect to maternal diabetic status and actual birth weight. Results: A total of 450 patients were studied (225 patients in each group). The mean (±SD) gestational age at delivery was 39.0 ± 1.5 weeks versus 39.9 ± 1.7 weeks for the diabetic and nondiabetic patients, respectively. There was no statistically significant difference between the two groups with respect to the mean (±SD) time interval between the ultrasonographic examination and delivery (0.9 ± 1.8 days vs 0.8 ± 2.1 days) or the mean (±SD) absolute percent error (9.0% ± 7.1% vs 8.4% ± 6.3%). The mean (±SD) absolute percent error of fetal weight estimates among subjects with macrosomic fetuses (birth weight ≥4500 gm) was significantly greater than that observed in fetuses with birth weights <4500 gm (12.6% ± 8.4% vs 8.4% ± 6.5, p = 0.001). This difference was observed irrespective of maternal diabetic status. Conclusion: When matched for maternal body mass index and birth weight, the accuracy of ultrasonographic fetal weight estimation was similar among diabetic and nondiabetic women. Birth weights ≥4500 gm rather than maternal diabetes seem to be associated with less accurate ultrasonographic fetal weight estimates.

      Keywords

      To read this article in full you will need to make a payment

      Purchase one-time access:

      Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online access
      One-time access price info
      • For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
      • For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'

      Subscribe:

      Subscribe to American Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology
      Already a print subscriber? Claim online access
      Already an online subscriber? Sign in
      Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect

      References

        • Lavin Jr, JP
        • Lovelace DR
        • Miodohink M
        • Knowles HC
        • Barden TP.
        Clinical experience with one hundred seven diabetic pregnancies.
        Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1983; 147: 742-752
        • Cousins L.
        The California diabetes and pregnancy programme: a statewide collaborative programme for the preconception and prenatal care of the diabetic women.
        Ballieres Clin Obstet Gynecol. 1991; 5: 443-459
        • Landon MB
        • Mintz MC
        • Gabbe SG
        • Sachs L.
        Management of diabetes mellitus and pregnancy: a survey of obstetricians and maternal-fetal specialists.
        Obstet Gynecol. 1990; 75: 635-640
        • Bernstein IM
        • Catalano PM.
        Influence of the fetal fat on the ultrasound estimation of fetal weight in diabetic mothers.
        Obstet Gynecol. 1992; 79: 561-563
        • Benson CB
        • Doublite PM
        • Saltzman DH.
        Sonographic determination of fetal weight in diabetic pregnancies.
        Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1987; 156: 441-444
        • McLaren RA
        • Puckett JL
        • Chauhan SP.
        Estimators of birth weight in pregnant women requiring insulin: a comparison of seven sonographic models.
        Obstet Gynecol. 1995; 85: 565-569
        • Hadlock FP
        • Harris RB
        • Carpenter RJ
        • Deter RL
        • Park SK.
        Sonographic estimation of fetal weight.
        Radiology. 1984; 150: 535-540
        • Shepard MJ
        • Richard VA
        • Berkowitz RL
        • Warsof SL
        • Hobbins JC.
        An evaluation of two equations for predicting fetal weight by ultrasound.
        Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1982; 142: 47-54
        • American College of Obstetrician and Gynecologists
        Management of diabetes mellitus in pregnancy.
        The College, Washington1991 (Technical Bulletin No.: 92)
        • Institute of Medicine, Committee on Nutritional Status During Pregnancy and Lactation, National Academy of Sciences
        Nutrition during pregnancy.
        National Academy Press, Washington1990
        • Platek DN
        • Divon MY
        • Anyaegbunam A
        • Merkatz IR.
        Intrapartum ultrasonographic estimates of fetal weight by the house staff.
        Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1991; 165: 842-845
        • Field NT
        • Piper JM
        • Langer O.
        The effect of maternal obesity on the accuracy of fetal weight estimation.
        Obstet Gynecol. 1995; 86: 102-107
        • Elliott JP
        • Garite TJ
        • Freeman RK
        • McQuown DS
        • Patel JM.
        Ultrasonic predication of fetal macrosomia in diabetic patients.
        Obstet Gynecol. 1982; 60: 159-162
        • Bracero LA
        • Baxi LV
        • Rey HR
        • Yeh MN.
        Use of ultrasound in antenatal diagnosis of large-for-gestational-age infants in diabetic gravid patients.
        Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1985; 152: 43-47
        • Tamura RK
        • Sabbagha RE
        • Depp R
        • Dooley SL
        • Socol ML.
        Diabetic macrosomia: accuracy of third trimester ultrasound.
        Obstet Gynecol. 1986; 67: 828-832