Background
Objective
Study Design
Results
Conclusion
Key words
Introduction
Why was this study conducted?
Key findings
What does this add to what is known?
Materials and Methods
Study population
Exposure assessment
Outcome assessment
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (US). CDC/NHSN surveillance definitions for specific types of infections. 2013. Available at: http://www.cdc.gov/nhsn/pdfs/pscmanual/17pscnosinfdef_current.pdf. Accessed April 17, 2018.
Statistical analysis
Subgroup analysis of infection by perineal trauma
Risk factors for infection: both trial arms
Baseline characteristic | Developed infection | Did not develop infection | P value | aRR (95% CI) |
---|---|---|---|---|
(n=452) | (n=2473) | |||
Mother’s age at randomization (y), mean (SD) | 30.5 (5.1) | 30.4 (5.4) | .71 | 1.00 (0.99–1.02) |
Gestational age at randomization, median (interquartile range) | 40.1 (39.3–41.0) | 40.3 (39.3–41.0) | .48 | |
Gestational age category (wk) | ||||
<37 | 5 (10.0) | 45 (90.0) | 1 | |
37 to <38 | 28 (16.5) | 142 (83.5) | 1.65 (0.67–4.04) | |
38 to <39 | 58 (17.9) | 266 (82.1) | 1.79 (0.75–4.25) | |
39 to <40 | 105 (16.9) | 518 (83.1) | 1.69 (0.72–3.94) | |
40 to <41 | 130 (14.0) | 801 (86.0) | 1.40 (0.60–3.26) | |
41 to <42 | 112 (15.2) | 625 (84.8) | 1.52 (0.65–3.55) | |
≥42 | 14 (15.6) | 76 (84.4) | 1.56 (0.60–4.07) | |
Maternal ethnicity | .43 | |||
White | 393 (15.7) | 2115 (84.3) | 1 | |
BAME | 59 (14.1) | 358 (85.9) | 0.90 (0.70–1.16) | |
BMI, median (interquartile range) | 25.1 (22.6–28.7) | 24.5 (21.9–28.2) | .019 | |
Maternal BMI category (kg/m2) | ||||
<25.0 | 221 (14.0) | 1360 (86.0) | 1 | |
25.0–29.9 | 136 (17.0) | 665 (83.0) | 1.21 (1.00–1.48) | |
≥30.0 | 95 (17.5) | 448 (82.5) | 1.25 (1.00–1.56) | |
Multiple pregnancy | .9 | |||
Single pregnancy | 450 (15.5) | 2461 (84.5) | 1 | |
Twin pregnancy | 2 (14.3) | 12 (85.7) | 0.92 (0.26–3.34) | |
Parity | <.001 | |||
Multiparous | 68 (11.1) | 542 (88.9) | 1 | |
Primiparous | 384 (16.6) | 1931 (83.4) | 1.49 (1.17–1.90) | |
Timing of membrane rupture before birth (h) | .41 | |||
<24 | 386 (15.2) | 2147 (84.8) | 1 | |
24 to <48 | 53 (16.0) | 278 (84.0) | 1.05 (0.81–1.37) | |
≥48 | 13 (21.3) | 48 (78.7) | 1.40 (0.86–2.28) | |
Induction of labor | .42 | |||
Induced | 230 (16.0) | 1207 (84.0) | 1 | |
Not induced | 222 (14.9) | 1266 (85.1) | 1.07 (0.91–1.27) | |
Mode of birth | <.001 | |||
Vacuum extraction | 106 (10.9) | 865 (89.1) | 1 | |
Forceps | 346 (17.7) | 1608 (82.3) | 1.62 (1.32–1.99) | |
Multiple modes of operative vaginal birth | .071 | |||
No | 423 (15.2) | 2363 (84.8) | 1 | |
Yes | 29 (20.9) | 110 (79.1) | 1.37 (0.98–1.92) | |
Reason for operative vaginal birth | .052 | |||
Nontime critical | 239 (16.8) | 1185 (83.2) | 1 | |
Time critical | 213 (14.2) | 1288 (85.8) | 0.85 (0.71–1.00) | |
Episiotomy during birth | <.001 | |||
No episiotomy | 11 (4.5) | 231 (95.5) | 1 | |
Episiotomy | 441 (16.4) | 2242 (83.6) | 3.62 (2.02–6.48) | |
Tear during birth | .36 | |||
No perineal tear | 301 (15.0) | 1701 (85.0) | 1 | |
Perineal tear | 151 (16.4) | 772 (83.6) | 1.09 (0.91–1.30) | |
Perineal wound sutured | 452 (15.5) | 2473 (84.5) | NA | NA |
Suturing location | .35 | |||
Operating theater | 168 (16.3) | 863 (83.7) | 1 | |
Labor ward | 284 (15.0) | 1610 (85.0) | 0.92 (0.77–1.10) | |
Suture material | .33 | |||
Vicryl | 15 (14.9) | 86 (85.1) | 1 | |
Vicryl Rapide | 427 (15.7) | 2289 (84.3) | 1.06 (0.66–1.70) | |
Other | 10 (9.3) | 98 (90.7) | 0.62 (0.29–1.32) | |
Allocation at randomization | <.001 | |||
Placebo | 285 (19.4) | 1187 (80.6) | 1 | |
Active (amoxicillin and clavulanic acid) | 167 (11.5) | 1286 (88.5) | 0.59 (0.50–0.71) | |
Received the trial intervention | 452 (15.5) | 2473 (84.5) | NA | NA |
Risk factors for infection and timing of administration: amoxicillin and clavulanic acid arm only
Ethics committee approval
Results
Subgroup analysis of infection by perineal trauma


Risk factors for infection: both trial arms

Risk factors for infection and timing of administration: amoxicillin and clavulanic acid arm only
Comment
Principal findings
Results in the context of what is known
Clinical implications
Research implications
UNFPA, World Health Organization, UNICEF, World Bank Group, the United Nations Population Division. Trends in maternal mortality: 2000 to 2017: Estimates by WHO, UNICEF, UNFPA, World Bank Group and the United Nations Population Division. 2019. Available at: https://www.unfpa.org/featured-publication/trends-maternal-mortality-2000-2017. Accessed July 27, 2021.
Strengths and limitations
- Knight M.
- Bunch K.
- Tuffnell D.
- et al.
Conclusions
Acknowledgments
Supplementary Data
- Video 1
Factors associated with infection following operative vaginal birth – a secondary analysis of the ANODE randomized controlled trial.
Humphreys. Factors associated with infection following operative vaginal birth. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2022.
Video 2 Factors associated with infection following operative vaginal birth – a secondary analysis of the ANODE randomized controlled trial.
Humphreys. Factors associated with infection following operative vaginal birth. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2022.
Appendix. Supplementary web material

Demographic and clinical variables | Obstetrical variables |
---|---|
-Age | -Gestational age at randomization |
-Ethnicity | -Parity (primiparous vs multiparous) |
-BMI | -If the pregnancy was a multiple pregnancy |
-Trial allocation | -Rupture of membranes before birth -Timing of membrane rupture |
-Induction of labor | |
-Multiple modes of operative vaginal birth attempted | |
-Mode of birth | |
-Episiotomy in current birth | |
-Perineal tear in current birth -Perineal wound suturing | |
-Suture material | |
-Location of suturing | |
-Reason for operative vaginal birth |
Characteristic | aRR (95% CI) |
---|---|
Mode of birth | |
Vacuum extraction | 1 |
Forceps | 1.39 (0.99–1.95) |
Use of episiotomy | |
No episiotomy | 1 |
Episiotomy | 5.60 (1.39–22.52) |
Parity | |
Multiparous | 1 |
Primiparous | 1.39 (0.92–2.10) |
BMI category | |
<25.0 kg/m2 | 1 |
25.0–29.9 kg/m2 | 1.51 (1.10–2.08) |
≥30.0 kg/m2 | 1.37 (0.94–2.01) |
Per 15-min increment between birth and amoxicillin and clavulanic acid administration | 1.03 (1.01–1.06) |
References
- Global causes of maternal death: a WHO systematic analysis.Lancet Glob Health. 2014; 2: e323-e333
- Frequency and management of maternal infection in health facilities in 52 countries (GLOSS): a 1-week inception cohort study.Lancet Glob Health. 2020; 8: e661-e671
- Maternal sepsis: a Scottish population-based case-control study.BJOG. 2012; 119: 474-483
- Severe maternal sepsis in the UK, 2011-2012: a national case-control study.PLoS Med. 2014; 11e1001672
- Prophylactic antibiotics in the prevention of infection after operative vaginal delivery (ANODE): a multicentre randomised controlled trial.Lancet. 2019; 393: 2395-2403
- Assisted vaginal birth: Green-top Guideline No. 26.BJOG. 2020; 127: e70-e112
- WHO recommendation on routine antibiotic prophylaxis for women undergoing operative vaginal birth. World Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland2021
- Operative vaginal birth: ACOG Practice Bulletin, Number 219.Obstet Gynecol. 2020; 135: e149-e159
- Assisted vaginal delivery in low and middle income countries: an overview.BJOG. 2017; 124: 1335-1344
- Maternal obesity, obstetric interventions and post-partum anaemia increase the risk of post-partum sepsis: a population-based cohort study based on Swedish medical health registers.Infect Dis (Lond). 2017; 49: 765-771
- Postpartum infection in relation to maternal characteristics, obstetric interventions and complications.J Perinat Med. 2018; 46: 271-278
- Obstetric perineal tears: risk factors, wound infection and dehiscence: a prospective cohort study.Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2019; 300: 67-77
- A prospective cohort study of maternal and neonatal morbidity in relation to use of episiotomy at operative vaginal delivery.BJOG. 2008; 115: 1688-1694
- Operative vaginal delivery and post-partum infection.Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol. 2019; 56: 93-106
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (US). CDC/NHSN surveillance definitions for specific types of infections. 2013. Available at: http://www.cdc.gov/nhsn/pdfs/pscmanual/17pscnosinfdef_current.pdf. Accessed April 17, 2018.
- Regression modelling strategies with applications to linear models, logistic regression, and survival analysis.Springer, New York, NY2001
- Associations Between maternal obesity and race, with obstetric anal sphincter injury: a retrospective cohort study.Hawaii J Med Public Health. 2019; 78: 8-12
- Proportion of disease caused or prevented by a given exposure, trait or intervention.Am J Epidemiol. 1974; 99: 325-332
- The continuum of maternal sepsis severity: incidence and risk factors in a population-based cohort study.PLoS One. 2013; 8e67175
- Incidence and risk factors of sepsis mortality in labor, delivery and after birth: population-based study in the USA.J Obstet Gynaecol Res. 2015; 41: 1201-1206
- Evaluation of delivery options for second-stage events.Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2016; 214: 638.e1-638.e10
- 722: Maternal and neonatal outcomes by attempted mode of operative delivery during the second stage of labor in term singleton gestations.Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2015; 212: S351-S352
- Trends in operative vaginal delivery rates and associated maternal complication rates in an inner-city hospital.Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2001; 184: 1112-1114
- Relationship between parity and the problems that appear in the postpartum period.Sci Rep. 2019; 911763
- Antibiotic prophylaxis for operative vaginal delivery.Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2020; 3: CD004455
UNFPA, World Health Organization, UNICEF, World Bank Group, the United Nations Population Division. Trends in maternal mortality: 2000 to 2017: Estimates by WHO, UNICEF, UNFPA, World Bank Group and the United Nations Population Division. 2019. Available at: https://www.unfpa.org/featured-publication/trends-maternal-mortality-2000-2017. Accessed July 27, 2021.
- eds. Saving Lives, Improving Mothers’ Care - lessons learned to inform maternity care from the UK and Ireland Confidential Enquiries into Maternal Deaths and Morbidity 2016-18.National Perinatal Epidemiology Unit, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom2020
Article info
Publication history
Publication stage
In Press Journal Pre-ProofFootnotes
The authors report no conflict of interest.
The prophylactic antibiotics for the prevention of infection following operative delivery (ANODE) trial was funded by the National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) Health Technology Assessment Programme (project number 13/96/07). M.K. is an NIHR Senior Investigator. The views expressed in this study are those of the authors and not necessarily those of the National Health Service, the NIHR, or the Department of Health and Social Care.
This study has been registered with the International Standard Randomised Controlled Trial Number registry (ISRCTN11166984).
Deidentified participant data will be shared in accordance with the National Perinatal Epidemiology Unit (NPEU)Data Sharing policy. Requests for access to the data will be considered by the NPEU Data Sharing committee from the date of publication. Data will be shared after approval of a proposal with investigator approval and completion of a signed data-sharing agreement. The trial protocol, statistical analysis plan, and other study documents are also available on request through this route. Access to the data can be requested from [email protected]
Cite this article as: Humphreys ABC, Linsell L, Knight M. Factors associated with infection following operative vaginal birth—a secondary analysis of the prophylactic antibiotics for the prevention of infection following operative delivery randomized controlled trial. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2022;XX:x.ex–x.ex.
Identification
Copyright
User license
Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY 4.0) |
Permitted
- Read, print & download
- Redistribute or republish the final article
- Text & data mine
- Translate the article
- Reuse portions or extracts from the article in other works
- Sell or re-use for commercial purposes
Elsevier's open access license policy