Purchase one-time access:Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online access
One-time access price info
- For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
- For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'
Subscribe:Subscribe to American Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology
- Surgery for women with apical vaginal prolapse.Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016; 10: CD012376
- Mesh sacrocolpopexy compared With native tissue vaginal repair: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Obstet Gynecol. 2015; 125: 44-55
- The standardization of terminology for researchers in female pelvic floor disorders.Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct. 2001; 12: 178-186
- Defining success after prolapse surgery for pelvic organ prolapse.Obstet Gynecol. 2009; 114: 600-609
- Effect of uterosacral ligament suspension vs sacrospinous ligament fixation with or without perioperative behavioral therapy for pelvic organ vaginal prolapse on surgical outcomes and prolapse symptoms at 5 years in the OPTIMAL randomized clinical trial.JAMA. 2018; 319: 1554-1565
- Long-term outcomes following abdominal sacrocolpopexy for pelvic organ prolapse.JAMA. 2013; 309: 2016-2024
- Effect of sacrospinous hysteropexy with graft vs vaginal hysterectomy with uterosacral ligament suspension on treatment failure in women with uterovaginal prolapse: 5-year results of a randomized clinical trial.Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2021; 225: 153.e1-153.e31
- Colpocleisis as an obliterative surgery for pelvic organ prolapse: is it still a viable option in the twenty-first century? Narrative review.Int Urogynecol J. 2021; : 1-16
- Ann Weber for the Pelvic Floor Disorders Network. Colpocleisis: a review.Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct. 2006; 17: 261-271
- Short-term outcomes of robotic sacrocolpopexy compared with abdominal sacrocolpopexy.Obstet Gynecol. 2008; 112: 1201-1206
- Symptomatic and anatomic 1-year outcomes after robotic and abdominal sacrocolpopexy.Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2012; 206: 435.e1-435.e5
- Gaining the patient perspective on pelvic floor disorders’ surgical adverse events.Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2019; 220: 185.e1-185.e10
- Development of a patient-centered pelvic floor complication scale.Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg. 2020; 26: 244-248
- A solution to the problem of monotone likelihood in Cox regression.Biometrics. 2001; 57: 114-119
- One-year outcomes after minimally invasive sacrocolpopexy.Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg. 2016; 22: 382-384
- Long-term results of robotic assisted laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy for the treatment of high grade vaginal vault prolapse.J Urol. 2006; 176: 655-659
- Complication and reoperation rates after apical vaginal prolapse surgical repair: a systematic review.Obstet Gynecol. 2009; 113: 367-373
- Outcomes of transvaginal high uterosacral ligaments suspension: over 500-patient single-center study.Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg. 2018; 24: 203-206
- Abdominal sacral colpopexy or vaginal sacrospinous colpopexy for vaginal vault prolapse: a prospective randomized study.Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2004; 190: 20-26
- Vaginal versus abdominal reconstructive surgery for the treatment of pelvic support defects: a prospective randomized study with long-term outcome evaluation.Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1996; 175: 1418-1422
- Vaginal sacrospinous colpopexy and laparoscopic sacral colpopexy for vaginal vault prolapse.Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2007; 86: 733-738
- Obliterative LeFort colpocleisis in a large group of elderly women.Obstet Gynecol. 2013; 121: 279-284
- Colpocleisis and tension-free vaginal tape sling for severe uterine and vaginal prolapse and stress urinary incontinence under local anesthesia.J Am Assoc Gynecol Laparosc. 2003; 10: 276-280
- Razor-type dermatomes enable quick and thin vaginal dissection with less bleeding in colpocleisis.Int Urogynecol J. 2020; 31: 1959-1964
- Obliterative versus reconstructive prolapse repair for women older than 70: is there an optimal approach?.Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg. 2017; 23: 23-26
- Outcomes in 450 women after minimally invasive abdominal sacrocolpopexy for pelvic organ prolapse.Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg. 2016; 22: 267-271
- A comparison of perioperative outcomes, readmission, and reoperation for sacrospinous ligament fixation, uterosacral ligament suspension, and minimally invasive sacrocolpopexy.Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg. 2021; 27: 133-139
- Obesity and outcomes after sacrocolpopexy.Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2008; 199: 690.e1-690.e8
- Patient preparedness: an important predictor of surgical outcome.Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2007; 197: 654.e1-654.e6
Publication stageIn Press Journal Pre-Proof
The authors report no conflict of interest.
Funding was provided by the Kaiser Permanente Southern California Regional Research Committee (RRC). The RRC provided a programmer for data collection and a statistician for analysis. Study design, data interpretation, and reporting of findings were performed independently of the RRC.
The study was presented at the 48th annual scientific meeting of the Society of Gynecologic Surgeons, San Antonio, TX, March 27–30, 2022.
Cite this article as: Shah NM, Berger AA, Zhuang Z, et al. Long-term reoperation risk after apical prolapse repair in female pelvic reconstructive surgery. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2022;XX:x.ex–x.ex.