Advertisement

Inadequacy and underreporting of study subjects’ race and ethnicity in federally funded pelvic floor research

Published:August 27, 2021DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajog.2021.08.036

      Background

      The inclusion of participants who are Black, Indigenous people of color, and participants of various ethnicities is a priority of federally sponsored research.

      Objective

      This study aimed to describe the reporting of race and ethnicity in federally funded research published by the Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development–funded Pelvic Floor Disorders Network.

      Study Design

      Pelvic Floor Disorders Network publications were reviewed to determine whether race or ethnicity was reported. The number of participants included in each manuscript who were identified as White, Black, Asian, American Indian or Alaska Native, Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander, and “other,” and the number of participants who identified as having Hispanic ethnicity were recorded. Data were analyzed by publication and by the pelvic floor disorder investigated, including urinary incontinence, pelvic organ prolapse, fecal incontinence, pregnancy-related pelvic floor disorders, and multiple pelvic floor disorders. Many publications reported on overlapping patient populations, which included primary trials and secondary analyses and studies. Data were analyzed both by counting participants every time they were reported in all papers and by counting the unique number of participants in only the original trials (primary paper published).

      Results

      A total of 132 Pelvic Floor Disorders Network publications were published between 2003 and 2020. Of these, 21 were excluded because they were methods papers or described research without participants. Of the 111 remaining articles, 90 (81%) included descriptions of race and 55 (50%) included descriptions of ethnicity. All 13 primary trials described race and 10 of 13 (76.9%) described ethnicity. Of those publications that described race, 50 of 90 (56%) included only the categories of “White,” “Black,” and “Other,” and 14 of 90 (16%) only described the percentage of White patients. Of the 49,218 subjects, there were 43,058 (87%) with reported race and 27,468 (56%) with reported ethnicity. Among subjects with race and ethnicity reported, 79% were reported as White, 9.9% as Black, 0.4% as Asian, 0.1% as American Indian or Alaska Native, and 4% as “other,” whereas 13% were reported to be of Hispanic ethnicity. The racial and ethnic diversity varied based on the pelvic floor disorder studied (P<.01), which was driven by pregnancy-related and fecal incontinence studies because these had lower proportions of White patients than studies of other pelvic floor disorders.

      Conclusion

      Federally funded Pelvic Floor Disorders Network research does not consistently report the race and ethnicity of participants. Even in the publications that report these characteristics, Black, Indigenous people of color, and people of Hispanic ethnicity are underrepresented. Consistent reporting and recruitment of a diverse population of women is necessary to address this systemic inequity.

      Key words

      To read this article in full you will need to make a payment

      Purchase one-time access:

      Academic and Personal
      One-time access price info
      • For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
      • For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'

      Subscribe:

      Subscribe to American Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology
      Already a print subscriber? Claim online access
      Already an online subscriber? Sign in
      Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect

      References

        • ACOG Committee Opinion No
        649: racial and ethnic disparities in obstetrics and gynecology.
        Obstet Gynecol. 2015; 126: e130-e134
        • Hartigan S.M.
        • Smith A.L.
        Disparities in female pelvic floor disorders.
        Curr Urol Rep. 2018; 19: 16
        • Sears C.L.G.
        • Wright J.
        • O’Brien J.
        • et al.
        The racial distribution of female pelvic floor disorders in an equal access health care system.
        J Urol. 2009; 181: 187-192
        • Shah A.D.
        • Kohli N.
        • Rajan S.S.
        • Hoyte L.
        Surgery for stress urinary incontinence in the United States: does race play a role?.
        Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct. 2008; 19: 1085-1092
        • Shah A.D.
        • Kohli N.
        • Rajan S.S.
        • Hoyte L.
        Racial characteristics of women undergoing surgery for pelvic organ prolapse in the United States.
        Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2007; 197: 70.e1-70.e8
        • Oh S.S.
        • Galanter J.
        • Thakur N.
        • et al.
        Diversity in clinical and biomedical research: a promise yet to be fulfilled.
        PLoS Med. 2015; 12e1001918
        • National Institutes of Health
        Subtitle B--clinical research equity regarding women and minorities. National Institutes of Health Revitalization Act of 1993. 1993.
        (Available at:)
        • Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development
        Pelvic Floor Disorders Network (PFDN). 2019.
        (Available at:)
        • National Institutes of Health
        NIH Policy and Guidelines on the Inclusion of Women and Minorities as Subjects in Clinical Research. 2017.
        (Available at:)
        • United States Census Bureau
        QuickFacts: United States. 2019.
        (Available at:)
        • Hendrix S.L.
        • Clark A.
        • Nygaard I.
        • Aragaki A.
        • Barnabei V.
        • McTiernan A.
        Pelvic organ prolapse in the Women’s Health Initiative: gravity and gravidity.
        Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2002; 186: 1160-1166
        • Fenner D.E.
        • Trowbridge E.R.
        • Patel D.A.
        • et al.
        Establishing the prevalence of incontinence study: racial differences in women’s patterns of urinary incontinence.
        J Urol. 2008; 179: 1455-1460
        • Lewicky-Gaupp C.
        • Brincat C.
        • Trowbridge E.R.
        • et al.
        Racial differences in bother for women with urinary incontinence in the Establishing the Prevalence of Incontinence (EPI) study.
        Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2009; 201: 510.e1-510.e6
        • Dunivan G.C.
        • Cichowski S.B.
        • Komesu Y.M.
        • Fairchild P.S.
        • Anger J.T.
        • Rogers R.G.
        Ethnicity and variations of pelvic organ prolapse bother.
        Int Urogynecol J. 2014; 25: 53-59
        • Kudish B.I.
        • Iglesia C.B.
        • Gutman R.E.
        • et al.
        Risk factors for prolapse development in white, black, and Hispanic women.
        Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg. 2011; 17: 80-90
        • Graham C.A.
        • Mallett V.T.
        Race as a predictor of urinary incontinence and pelvic organ prolapse.
        Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2001; 185: 116-120
        • Nygaard I.
        • Barber M.D.
        • Burgio K.L.
        • et al.
        Prevalence of symptomatic pelvic floor disorders in US women.
        JAMA. 2008; 300: 1311-1316
        • Akbar A.
        • Liu K.
        • Michos E.D.
        • et al.
        Racial differences in urinary incontinence prevalence and associated bother: the Multi-Ethnic Study of Atherosclerosis.
        Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2021; 224: 80.e1-80.e9
        • Cardenas-Trowers O.O.
        • Gaskins J.T.
        • Francis S.L.
        Association of patient race with type of pelvic organ prolapse surgery performed and adverse events.
        Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg. 2020; ([Epub ahead of print])
        • Bergdall A.
        • Asche S.
        • Schneider N.
        • et al.
        Comparison of ethnicity and race categorization in electronic medical records and by self-report.
        Clin Med Res. 2012; 10: 172
        • Klinger E.V.
        • Carlini S.V.
        • Gonzalez I.
        • et al.
        Accuracy of race, ethnicity, and language preference in an electronic health record.
        J Gen Intern Med. 2015; 30: 719-723