Advertisement

Defining mechanisms of recurrence following apical prolapse repair based on imaging criteria

      Background

      Prolapse recurrence after transvaginal surgical repair is common; however, its mechanisms are ill-defined. A thorough understanding of how and why prolapse repairs fail is needed to address their high rate of anatomic recurrence and to develop novel therapies to overcome defined deficiencies.

      Objective

      This study aimed to identify mechanisms and contributors of anatomic recurrence after vaginal hysterectomy with uterosacral ligament suspension (native tissue repair) vs transvaginal mesh (VM) hysteropexy surgery for uterovaginal prolapse.

      Study Design

      This multicenter study was conducted in a subset of participants in a randomized clinical trial by the Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development Pelvic Floor Disorders Network. Overall, 94 women with uterovaginal prolapse treated via native tissue repair (n=48) or VM hysteropexy (n=46) underwent pelvic magnetic resonance imaging at rest, maximal strain, and poststrain rest (recovery) 30 to 42 months after surgery. Participants who desired reoperation before 30 to 42 months were imaged earlier to assess the impact of the index surgery. Using a novel 3-dimensional pelvic coordinate system, coregistered midsagittal images were obtained to assess study outcomes. Magnetic resonance imaging–based anatomic recurrence (failure) was defined as prolapse beyond the hymen. The primary outcome was the mechanism of failure (apical descent vs anterior vaginal wall elongation), including the frequency and site of failure. Secondary outcomes included displacement of the vaginal apex and perineal body and change in the length of the anterior wall, posterior wall, vaginal perimeter, and introitus of the vagina from rest to strain and rest to recovery. Group differences in the mechanism, frequency, and site of failure were assessed using the Fisher exact tests, and secondary outcomes were compared using Wilcoxon rank-sum tests.

      Results

      Of the 88 participants analyzed, 37 (42%) had recurrent prolapse (VM hysteropexy, 13 of 45 [29%]; native tissue repair, 24 of 43 [56%]). The most common site of failure was the anterior compartment (VM hysteropexy, 38%; native tissue repair, 92%). The primary mechanism of recurrence was apical descent (VM hysteropexy, 85%; native tissue repair, 67%). From rest to strain, failures (vs successes) had greater inferior displacement of the vaginal apex (difference, −12 mm; 95% confidence interval, −19 to −6) and perineal body (difference, −7 mm; 95% confidence interval, −11 to −4) and elongation of the anterior vaginal wall (difference, 12 mm; 95% confidence interval, 8–16) and vaginal introitus (difference, 11 mm; 95% confidence interval, 7–15).

      Conclusion

      The primary mechanism of prolapse recurrence following vaginal hysterectomy with uterosacral ligament suspension or VM hysteropexy was apical descent. In addition, greater inferior descent of the vaginal apex and perineal body, lengthening of the anterior vaginal wall, and increased size of the vaginal introitus with strain were associated with anatomic failure. Further studies are needed to provide additional insight into the mechanism by which these factors contribute to anatomic failure.

      Key words

      To read this article in full you will need to make a payment

      Purchase one-time access:

      Academic and Personal
      One-time access price info
      • For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
      • For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'

      Subscribe:

      Subscribe to American Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology
      Already a print subscriber? Claim online access
      Already an online subscriber? Sign in
      Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect

      References

        • Wu J.M.
        • Matthews C.A.
        • Conover M.M.
        • Pate V.
        • Jonsson Funk M.
        Lifetime risk of stress urinary incontinence or pelvic organ prolapse surgery.
        Obstet Gynecol. 2014; 123: 1201-1206
        • Smith F.J.
        • Holman C.D.A.J.
        • Moorin R.E.
        • Tsokos N.
        Lifetime risk of undergoing surgery for pelvic organ prolapse.
        Obstet Gynecol. 2010; 116: 1096-1100
        • Olsen A.L.
        • Smith V.J.
        • Bergstrom J.O.
        • Colling J.C.
        • Clark A.L.
        Epidemiology of surgically managed pelvic organ prolapse and urinary incontinence.
        Obstet Gynecol. 1997; 89: 501-506
        • Barber M.D.
        • Brubaker L.
        • Burgio K.L.
        • et al.
        Comparison of 2 transvaginal surgical approaches and perioperative behavioral therapy for apical vaginal prolapse: the OPTIMAL randomized trial.
        JAMA. 2014; 311: 1023-1034
        • Jelovsek J.E.
        • Barber M.D.
        • Brubaker L.
        • et al.
        Effect of uterosacral ligament suspension vs sacrospinous ligament fixation with or without perioperative behavioral therapy for pelvic organ vaginal prolapse on surgical outcomes and prolapse symptoms at 5 years in the OPTIMAL randomized clinical trial.
        JAMA. 2018; 319: 1554-1565
        • US Food and Drug Administration
        FDA takes action to protect women’s health, orders manufacturers of surgical mesh intended for transvaginal repair of pelvic organ prolapse to stop selling all devices.
        (Available at:)
        • Persu C.
        • Chapple C.R.
        • Cauni V.
        • Gutue S.
        • Geavlete P.
        Pelvic Organ prolapse Quantification System (POP-Q) - a new era in pelvic prolapse staging.
        J Med Life. 2011; 4: 75-81
        • Bø K.
        • Freeman R.
        • Chapple C.K.
        • Abrams P.
        Evidence-based physical therapy for the pelvic floor: bridging science and clinical practice.
        Churchill Livingstone, Edinburgh, Scotland2015
        • Nager C.W.
        • Visco A.G.
        • Richter H.E.
        • et al.
        Effect of vaginal mesh hysteropexy vs vaginal hysterectomy with uterosacral ligament suspension on treatment failure in women with uterovaginal prolapse: a randomized clinical trial.
        JAMA. 2019; 322: 1054-1065
        • Moalli P.A.
        • Bowen S.T.
        • Abramowitch S.D.
        • et al.
        Methods for the defining mechanisms of anterior vaginal wall descent (DEMAND) study.
        Int Urogynecol J. 2021; 32: 809-818
        • Fedorov A.
        • Beichel R.
        • Kalpathy-Cramer J.
        • et al.
        3D Slicer as an image computing platform for the Quantitative Imaging Network.
        Magn Reson Imaging. 2012; 30: 1323-1341
        • Easley D.C.
        • Menon P.G.
        • Abramowitch S.D.
        • Moalli P.A.
        Inter-observer variability of vaginal wall segmentation from MRI: a statistical shape analysis approach.
        in: ASME International Mechanical Engineering Congress and Exposition Houston, TX. 2015
        • Morgan D.M.
        • Larson K.
        • Lewicky-Gaupp C.
        • Fenner D.E.
        • Delancey J.O.
        Vaginal support as determined by levator ani defect status 6 weeks after primary surgery for pelvic organ prolapse.
        Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2011; 114: 141-144
        • Hsu Y.
        • Chen L.
        • Summers A.
        • Ashton-Miller J.A.
        • Delancey J.O.
        Anterior vaginal wall length and degree of anterior compartment prolapse seen on dynamic MRI.
        Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct. 2008; 19: 137-142
        • Chen L.
        • Ashton-Miller J.A.
        • Hsu Y.
        • DeLancey J.O.
        Interaction among apical support, levator ani impairment, and anterior vaginal wall prolapse.
        Obstet Gynecol. 2006; 108: 324-332
        • Pannu H.K.
        • Scatarige J.C.
        • Eng J.
        MRI diagnosis of pelvic organ prolapse compared with clinical examination.
        Acad Radiol. 2011; 18: 1245-1251
        • Lakeman M.M.
        • Zijta F.M.
        • Peringa J.
        • Nederveen A.J.
        • Stoker J.
        • Roovers J.P.
        Dynamic magnetic resonance imaging to quantify pelvic organ prolapse: reliability of assessment and correlation with clinical findings and pelvic floor symptoms.
        Int Urogynecol J. 2012; 23: 1547-1554
        • Hsu Y.
        • Summers A.
        • Hussain H.K.
        • Guire K.E.
        • Delancey J.O.
        Levator plate angle in women with pelvic organ prolapse compared to women with normal support using dynamic MR imaging.
        Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2006; 194: 1427-1433
        • Lowder J.L.
        • Oliphant S.S.
        • Shepherd J.P.
        • Ghetti C.
        • Sutkin G.
        Genital hiatus size is associated with and predictive of apical vaginal support loss.
        Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2016; 214: 718.e1-718.e8
        • Lee D.D.
        • Siegelman E.S.
        • Chua W.Y.
        • Arya L.A.
        • Harvie H.S.
        Comparison of vaginal axis in women who have undergone hysterectomy versus women with an intact uterus.
        Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg. 2019; 25: 313-317
        • Morley G.W.
        • DeLancey J.O.
        Sacrospinous ligament fixation for eversion of the vagina.
        Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1988; 158: 872-881
        • Shull B.L.
        • Capen C.V.
        • Riggs M.W.
        • Kuehl T.J.
        Preoperative and postoperative analysis of site-specific pelvic support defects in 81 women treated with sacrospinous ligament suspension and pelvic reconstruction.
        Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1992; 166 (discussion 1768–71): 1764-1768
        • Juliato C.R.T.
        • Santos-Junior L.C.
        • de Castro E.B.
        • Dertkigil S.S.
        • Brito L.G.O.
        Vaginal axis after abdominal sacrocolpopexy versus vaginal sacrospinous fixation-a randomized trial.
        Neurourol Urodyn. 2019; 38: 1142-1151
        • Senturk M.B.
        • Kilicci C.
        • Aydin S.
        • Polat M.
        • Abide Yayla C.
        • Karateke A.
        Vaginal axis on MRI after unilateral and bilateral sacral hysteropexy: a controlled study.
        J Obstet Gynaecol. 2018; 38: 115-120
        • Balgobin S.
        • Good M.M.
        • Dillon S.J.
        • Corton M.M.
        Lowest colpopexy sacral fixation point alters vaginal axis and cul-de-sac depth.
        Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2013; 208: 488.e1-488.e6
        • Summers A.
        • Winkel L.A.
        • Hussain H.K.
        • DeLancey J.O.
        The relationship between anterior and apical compartment support.
        Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2006; 194: 1438-1443
        • Yousuf A.
        • Chen L.
        • Larson K.
        • Ashton-Miller J.A.
        • DeLancey J.O.
        The length of anterior vaginal wall exposed to external pressure on maximal straining MRI: relationship to urogenital hiatus diameter, and apical and bladder location.
        Int Urogynecol J. 2014; 25: 1349-1356
        • DeLancey J.O.
        • Morgan D.M.
        • Fenner D.E.
        • et al.
        Comparison of levator ani muscle defects and function in women with and without pelvic organ prolapse.
        Obstet Gynecol. 2007; 109: 295-302