Health resource utilization of labor induction versus expectant management

Published:January 10, 2020DOI:


      Although induction of labor of low-risk nulliparous women at 39 weeks reduces the risk of cesarean delivery compared with expectant management, concern regarding more frequent use of labor induction remains, given that this intervention historically has been thought to incur greater resource utilization.


      The objective of the study was to determine whether planned elective labor induction at 39 weeks among low-risk nulliparous women, compared with expectant management, was associated with differences in health care resource utilization from the time of randomization through 8 weeks postpartum.

      Study Design

      This is a planned secondary analysis of a multicenter randomized trial in which low-risk nulliparous women were assigned to induction of labor at 39 weeks or expectant management. We assessed resource utilization after randomization in 3 time periods: antepartum, delivery admission, and discharge through 8 weeks postpartum.


      Of 6096 women with data available, those in the induction of labor group (n = 3059) were significantly less likely in the antepartum period after randomization to have at least 1 ambulatory visit for routine prenatal care (32.4% vs 68.4%), unanticipated care (0.5% vs 2.6%), or urgent care (16.2% vs 44.3%), or at least 1 antepartum hospitalization (0.8% vs 2.2%, P < .001 for all). They also had fewer tests (eg, sonograms, blood tests) and treatments (eg, antibiotics, intravenous hydration) prior to delivery. During the delivery admission, women in the induction of labor group spent a longer time in labor and delivery (median, 0.83 vs 0.57 days), but both women (P = .002) and their neonates (P < .001) had shorter postpartum stays. Women and neonates in both groups had similar frequencies of postpartum urgent care and hospital readmissions (P > .05 for all).


      Women randomized to induction of labor had longer durations in labor and delivery but significantly fewer antepartum visits, tests, and treatments and shorter maternal and neonatal hospital durations after delivery. These results demonstrate that the health outcome advantages associated with induction of labor are gained without incurring uniformly greater health care resource use.

      Key words

      To read this article in full you will need to make a payment

      Purchase one-time access:

      Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online access
      One-time access price info
      • For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
      • For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'


      Subscribe to American Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology
      Already a print subscriber? Claim online access
      Already an online subscriber? Sign in
      Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect


        • Grobman W.A.
        • Rice M.M.
        • Reddy U.M.
        • et al.
        Labor induction versus expectant management in low-risk nulliparous women.
        N Engl J Med. 2018; 379: 513-523
        • American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists
        Practice advisory: clinical guidance for integration of the findings of the ARRIVE trial: labor induction versus expectant management in low-risk nulliparous women.
        (Available at:)
      1. SMFM statement on elective induction of labor in low-risk nulliparous women at term: the ARRIVE Trial. Society of Maternal-Fetal (SMFM) Publications Committee.
        Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2019; 221: B2-B4
        • Van Gemund N.
        • Hardeman A.
        • Scherjon S.A.
        • Kanhai H.H.H.
        Intervention rates after elective induction of labor compared to labor with a spontaneous onset.
        Gynecol Obstet Invest. 2013; 56: 133-138
        • Seyb S.T.
        • Berka R.J.
        • Socol M.S.
        • Dooley S.L.
        Risk of cesarean delivery with elective induction of labor at term in nulliparous women.
        Obstet Gynecol. 1999; 94: 600-607
        • Maslow A.S.
        • Sweeny A.L.
        Elective induction of labor as a risk factor for cesarean delivery among low-risk women at term.
        Obstet Gynecol. 2000; 95: 917-922
        • Allen V.M.
        • O’Connell C.M.
        • Farrell S.
        • Baskett T.F.
        Economic implications of method of delivery.
        Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2005; 193: 192-197
        • Cammu H.
        • Martens G.
        • Ruyssinck G.
        • Amy J.J.
        Outcome after elective labor induction in nulliparous women: a matched cohort study.
        Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2002; 186: 240-244
        • Tracy S.K.
        • Tracy M.B.
        Costing the cascade: estimating the cost of increased obstetric intervention in childbirth using population data.
        BJOG. 2003; 110: 717-724
        • Caughey A.B.1
        • Nicholson J.M.
        • Cheng Y.W.
        • Lyell D.J.
        • Washington A.E.
        Induction of labor and cesarean delivery by gestational age.
        Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2006; 195: 700-705
        • Walker K.F.
        • Bugg G.J.
        • Macpherson M.
        • et al.
        Randomized trial of labor induction in women 35 years of age or older.
        N Engl J Med. 2016; 374: 813-822
        • Goeree R.
        • Hannah M.
        • Hewson S.
        cost-effectiveness of induction of labour versus serial antenatal monitoring in the Canadian multicenter postterm pregnancy trial.
        Can Med Assoc J. 1995; 152: 1445-1450
        • Vijgen S.
        • Koopmans C.
        • Opmeer B.
        • et al.
        An economic analysis of induction of labour and expectant monitoring in women with gestational hypertension or pre-eclampsia at term (HYPITAT trial).
        BJOG. 2010; 117: 1577-1585
        • Walker K.F.
        • Dritsaki M.
        • Bugg G.
        • et al.
        Labour induction near term for women aged 35 or over: an economic evaluation.
        BJOG. 2017; 124: 929-934
        • Hersh A.R.
        • Skeith A.E.
        • Sargent J.A.
        • Caughey A.B.
        Induction of labor at 39 weeks of gestation versus expectant management for low-risk nulliparous women: a cost-effectiveness analysis.
        Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2019; 220: 590.e1-590.e10
        • Gyamfi-Bannerman C.
        • Zupancic J.A.F.
        • Sandoval G.
        • et al.
        Cost-effectiveness of antenatal corticosteroid therapy vs. no therapy in women at risk of late preterm delivery.
        JAMA Pediatr. 2019; 173: 462-468
      2. State of Illinois Access Monitoring Review Plan—2016.
        (Available at:)
        • FRED Economic Data
        Consumer price index for all urban consumers.
        (Available at:)
        Date accessed: November 17, 2019
      3. Historical currency converter.
        (Available at:)