Advertisement

The worst of both worlds—combined deliveries in twin gestations: a subanalysis of the Twin Birth Study, a randomized, controlled, prospective study

      Objective

      The reported incidence of combined twin delivery (vaginal delivery of twin A followed by cesarean delivery for twin B) ranges between 5% and 10%. These estimates are based mostly on small studies or retrospective data. We aimed to evaluate to incidence and risk factors for and outcomes of combined twin deliveries, using a subanalysis of the Twin Birth Study, a randomized, controlled, prospective study.

      Study design

      The Twin Birth Study included women with twin gestation between 32+0 and 38+6 weeks, with the first twin in vertex presentation at randomization. Women were randomized to planned cesarean delivery or planned vaginal delivery. For the purpose of this subanalysis, we included women who had a vaginal delivery of twin A. Women who had a combined delivery (cesarean delivery for twin B) were compared with women who had a vaginal delivery of both twins. Our primary objective was to identify risk factors for combined twin deliveries. Our secondary objective was to assess the rate of fetal/neonatal death or serious neonatal morbidity in combined deliveries.

      Results

      Of the 2786 women included in the original study, 842 women delivered twin A by a vaginal delivery and were included in the current analysis, of whom 59 (7%) had a combined delivery. Women in the combined delivery group had a lower rate of nulliparity (22.0% vs 34.7%, P = 0.047) and higher rates of noncephalic presentation of twin B at delivery (61.0% vs 27.3%, P < 0.001) and spontaneous version from presentation at randomization of twin B (72.9% vs 44.3%, P < 0.0001). In a multivariable model, the only risk factor significantly associated with a combined delivery was transverse/oblique lie of twin B following delivery of twin A (adjusted odds ratio, 47.7; 95% confidence interval, 15.4–124.5). Twins B in the combined delivery group had a higher rate of fetal/neonatal death or serious neonatal morbidity (13.6% vs 2.3%, P < 0.001), 5-minute Apgar score <7, neonatal intensive care unit admission, abnormal level of consciousness, and assisted ventilation.

      Conclusion

      Transverse/oblique lie of twin B following vaginal delivery of twin A is a risk factor for combined delivery. Combined delivery is associated with higher risk of adverse neonatal outcomes of twin B. These data may be used to better counsel women with twin gestation who consider a trial of labor.

      Key words

      To read this article in full you will need to make a payment

      Purchase one-time access:

      Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online access
      One-time access price info
      • For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
      • For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'

      Subscribe:

      Subscribe to American Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology
      Already a print subscriber? Claim online access
      Already an online subscriber? Sign in
      Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect

      References

        • Martin J.A.
        • Hamilton B.E.
        • Osterman M.J.K.
        • Driscoll A.K.
        • Drake P.
        Births: final data for 2016.
        Natl Vital Stat Rep. 2018; 67: 1-52
        • Hartley R.S.
        • Emanuel I.
        • Hitti J.
        Perinatal mortality and neonatal morbidity rates among twin pairs at different gestational ages: optimal delivery timing at 37 to 38 weeks’ gestation.
        Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2001; 184: 451-458
        • Schmitz T.
        • Carnavalet Cde C.
        • Azria E.
        • et al.
        Neonatal outcomes of twin pregnancy according to the planned mode of delivery.
        Obstet Gynecol. 2008; 111: 695-703
        • Rabinovici J.
        • Barkai G.
        • Reichman B.
        • et al.
        Randomized management of the nonvertex twin: vaginal delivery or cesarean section.
        Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1987; 156: 52-56
        • Hogle K.L.
        • Hutton E.K.
        • McBrien K.A.
        • et al.
        Cesarean delivery for twins: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
        Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2003; 188: 220-227
        • Kurzel R.B.
        • Claridad L.
        • Lampley E.C.
        Cesarean section for the second twin.
        J Reprod Med. 1997; 42: 767-770
        • Ginsberg N.
        • Levine E.M.
        Delivery of the second twin.
        Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2005; 91: 217-220
        • Bider D.
        • Korach J.
        • Hourvitz A.
        • Dulitzky M.
        • Goldenberg M.
        • Mashiach S.
        Combined vaginal-abdominal delivery of twins.
        J Reprod Med. 1995; 40: 131-134
        • Aviram A.
        • Weiser I.
        • Ashwal E.
        • Bar J.
        • Wiznitzer A.
        • Yogev Y.
        Combined vaginal-cesarean delivery of twins: risk factors and neonatal outcome, a single center experience.
        J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2015; 28: 509-514
        • Breathnach F.M.
        • McAuliffe F.M.
        • Geary M.
        • et al.
        Prediction of safe and successful vaginal twin birth.
        Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2011; 205: 237
        • Persad V.L.
        • Baskett T.F.
        • O’Connell C.M.
        • Scott H.M.
        Combined vaginal-cesarean delivery of twin pregnancies.
        Obstet Gynecol. 2001; 98: 1032-1037
        • Wen S.W.
        • Fung K.F.K.
        • Oppenheimer L.
        • Demissie K.
        • Yang Q.
        • Walker M.
        Occurrence and predictors of cesarean delivery for the second twin after vaginal delivery of the first twin.
        Obstet Gynecol. 2004; 103: 413-419
        • Alexander J.M.
        • Leveno K.J.
        • Rouse D.
        • et al.
        Cesarean delivery for the second twin.
        Obstet Gynecol. 2008; 112: 748-752
        • Barrett J.F.R.
        • Hannah M.E.
        • Hutton E.K.
        • et al.
        A randomized trial of planned cesarean or vaginal delivery for twin pregnancy.
        N Engl J Med. 2013; 369: 1295-1305
        • Kong C.W.
        • To W.W.K.
        The predicting factors and outcomes of caesarean section of the second twin.
        J Obstet Gynaecol. 2017; 37: 709-713
        • Suzuki S.
        Risk factors for emergency cesarean delivery of the second twin after vaginal delivery of the first twin.
        J Obstet Gynaecol Res. 2009; 35: 467-471
        • Easter S.R.
        • Lieberman E.
        • Carusi D.
        Fetal presentation and successful twin vaginal delivery.
        Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2016; 214: 116.e1-116.e10
        • Vogel J.P.
        • Holloway E.
        • Cuesta C.
        • Carroli G.
        • Souza J.P.
        • Barrett J.
        Outcomes of non-vertex second twins, following vertex vaginal delivery of first twin.
        a secondary analysis of the WHO Global Survey on maternal and perinatal health. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2014; 14: 55
        • Rossi A.C.
        • Mullin P.M.
        • Chmait R.H.
        Neonatal outcomes of twins according to birth order, presentation and mode of delivery.
        a systematic review and meta-analysisBJOG. 2011; 118: 523-532