Advertisement

Laparoscopic and robotic hysterectomy in endometrial cancer patients with obesity: a systematic review and meta-analysis of conversions and complications

      Objective Data

      Robotic assistance may facilitate completion of minimally invasive hysterectomy, which is the standard of care for the treatment of early-stage endometrial cancer, in patients for whom conventional laparoscopy is challenging. The aim of this systematic review was to assess conversion to laparotomy and perioperative complications after laparoscopic and robotic hysterectomy in patients with endometrial cancer and obesity (body mass index, ≥30 kg/m2).

      Study

      We systematically searched MEDLINE, EMBASE, and Evidence-Based Medicine Reviews (January 1, 2000, to July 18, 2018) for studies of patients with endometrial cancer and obesity (body mass index, ≥30 kg/m2) who underwent primary hysterectomy.

      Study Appraisal and Synthesis Methods

      We determined the pooled proportions of conversion, organ/vessel injury, venous thromboembolism, and blood transfusion. We assessed risk of bias with the Institute of Health Economics Quality Appraisal Checklist for single-arm studies, and Newcastle-Ottawa Quality Scale for double-arm studies.

      Results

      We identified 51 observational studies that reported on 10,800 patients with endometrial cancer and obesity (study-level body mass index, 31.0–56.3 kg/m2). The pooled proportions of conversion from laparoscopic and robotic hysterectomy were 6.5% (95% confidence interval, 4.3–9.9) and 5.5% (95% confidence interval, 3.3–9.1), respectively, among patients with a body mass index of ≥30 kg/m2, and 7.0% (95% confidence interval, 3.2–14.5) and 3.8% (95% confidence interval, 1.4–9.9) among patients with body mass index of ≥40 kg/m2. Inadequate exposure because of adhesions/visceral adiposity was the most common reason for conversion for both laparoscopic (32%) and robotic hysterectomy (61%); however, intolerance of the Trendelenburg position caused 31% of laparoscopic conversions and 6% of robotic hysterectomy conversions. The pooled proportions of organ/vessel injury (laparoscopic, 3.5% [95% confidence interval, 2.2–5.5]; robotic hysterectomy, 1.2% [95% confidence interval, 0.4–3.4]), venous thromboembolism (laparoscopic, 0.5% [95% confidence interval, 0.2–1.2]; robotic hysterectomy, 0.5% [95% confidence interval, 0.1–2.0]), and blood transfusion (laparoscopic, 2.8% [95% confidence interval, 1.5–5.1]; robotic hysterectomy, 2.1% [95% confidence interval, 1.6–3.8]) were low and not appreciably different between arms.

      Conclusion

      Robotic and laparoscopic hysterectomy have similar rates perioperative complications in patients with endometrial cancer and obesity, but robotic hysterectomy may reduce conversions because of positional intolerance in patients with morbid obesity. Existing literature is limited by selection and confounding bias, and randomized trials are needed to inform practice standards in this population.

      Key words

      To read this article in full you will need to make a payment

      Purchase one-time access:

      Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online access
      One-time access price info
      • For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
      • For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'

      Subscribe:

      Subscribe to American Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology
      Already a print subscriber? Claim online access
      Already an online subscriber? Sign in
      Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect

      References

        • Mahdi H.
        • Jernigan A.M.
        • Aljebori Q.
        • Lockhart D.
        • Moslemi-Kebria M.
        The impact of obesity on the 30-day morbidity and mortality after surgery for endometrial cancer.
        J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2015; 22: 94-102
        • Suidan R.S.
        • He W.
        • Sun C.C.
        • et al.
        Impact of body mass index and operative approach on surgical morbidity and costs in women with endometrial carcinoma and hyperplasia.
        Gynecol Oncol. 2017; 145: 55-60
        • Janda M.
        • Gebski V.
        • Forder P.
        • et al.
        Total laparoscopic versus open surgery for stage 1 endometrial cancer: the LACE randomized controlled trial.
        Contemp Clin Trials. 2006; 27: 353-363
        • Janda M.
        • Gebski V.
        • Brand A.
        • et al.
        Quality of life after total laparoscopic hysterectomy versus total abdominal hysterectomy for stage I endometrial cancer (LACE): a randomised trial.
        Lancet Oncol. 2010; 11: 772-780
        • Malzoni M.
        • Tinelli R.
        • Cosentino F.
        • et al.
        Total laparoscopic hysterectomy versus abdominal hysterectomy with lymphadenectomy for early-stage endometrial cancer: a prospective randomized study.
        Gynecol Oncol. 2009; 112: 126-133
        • Mourits M.J.
        • Bijen C.B.
        • Arts H.J.
        • et al.
        Safety of laparoscopy versus laparotomy in early-stage endometrial cancer: a randomised trial.
        Lancet Oncol. 2010; 11: 763-771
        • Bijen C.B.
        • Briet J.M.
        • de Bock G.H.
        • Arts H.J.
        • Bergsma-Kadijk J.A.
        • Mourits M.J.
        Total laparoscopic hysterectomy versus abdominal hysterectomy in the treatment of patients with early stage endometrial cancer: a randomized multi center study.
        BMC Cancer. 2009; 9: 23
        • Walker J.L.
        • Piedmonte M.R.
        • Spirtos N.M.
        • et al.
        Laparoscopy compared with laparotomy for comprehensive surgical staging of uterine cancer: Gynecologic Oncology Group Study LAP2.
        J Clin Oncol. 2009; 27: 5331-5336
        • Walker J.L.
        • Piedmonte M.R.
        • Spirtos N.M.
        • et al.
        Recurrence and survival after random assignment to laparoscopy versus laparotomy for comprehensive surgical staging of uterine cancer: Gynecologic Oncology Group LAP2 Study.
        J Clin Oncol. 2012; 30: 695-700
        • Kornblith A.B.
        • Huang H.Q.
        • Walker J.L.
        • Spirtos N.M.
        • Rotmensch J.
        • Cella D.
        Quality of life of patients with endometrial cancer undergoing laparoscopic international federation of gynecology and obstetrics staging compared with laparotomy: a Gynecologic Oncology Group study.
        J Clin Oncol. 2009; 27: 5337-5342
        • Lamvu G.
        • Zolnoun D.
        • Boggess J.
        • Steege J.F.
        Obesity: physiologic changes and challenges during laparoscopy.
        Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2004; 191: 669-674
        • Al Sawah E.
        • Salemi J.L.
        • Hoffman M.
        • Imudia A.N.
        • Mikhail E.
        Association between obesity, surgical route, and perioperative outcomes in patients with uterine cancer.
        Minim Invasive Surg. 2018; 2018: 5130856
        • Committee opinion no
        628: robotic surgery in gynecology.
        Obstet Gynecol. 2015; 125: 760-767
        • Committee on Gynecologic Practice
        Committee opinion no. 619: gynecologic surgery in the obese woman.
        Obstet Gynecol. 2015; 125: 274-278
        • Hayden P.
        • Cowman S.
        Anaesthesia for laparoscopic surgery.
        Contin Educ Anaesth Crit Care Pain. 2011; 11: 177-180
        • Gala R.B.
        • Margulies R.
        • Steinberg A.
        • et al.
        Systematic review of robotic surgery in gynecology: robotic techniques compared with laparoscopy and laparotomy.
        J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2014; 21: 353-361
        • Liu H.
        • Lawrie T.A.
        • Lu D.
        • Song H.
        • Wang L.
        • Shi G.
        Robot-assisted surgery in gynaecology.
        Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2014; 12: CD011422
        • Albright B.B.
        • Witte T.
        • Tofte A.N.
        • et al.
        Robotic versus laparoscopic hysterectomy for benign disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized trials.
        J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2016; 23: 18-27
        • Eheman C.
        • Henley S.J.
        • Ballard-Barbash R.
        • et al.
        Annual report to the nation on the status of cancer, 1975–2008, featuring cancers associated with excess weight and lack of sufficient physical activity.
        Cancer. 2012; 118: 2338-2366
        • Dekkers O.M.
        • Egger M.
        • Altman D.G.
        • Vandenbroucke J.P.
        Distinguishing case series from cohort studies.
        Ann Intern Med. 2012; 156: 37-40
        • Morrison A.
        • Polisena J.
        • Husereau D.
        • et al.
        The effect of English-language restriction on systematic review-based meta-analyses: a systematic review of empirical studies.
        Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 2012; 28: 138-144
        • Toma M.
        • McAlister F.A.
        • Bialy L.
        • Adams D.
        • Vandermeer B.
        • Armstrong P.W.
        Transition from meeting abstract to full-length journal article for randomized controlled trials.
        JAMA. 2006; 295: 1281-1287
        • Hopewell S.
        • Clarke M.
        • Askie L.
        Reporting of trials presented in conference abstracts needs to be improved.
        J Clin Epidemiol. 2006; 59: 681-684
        • Scalici J.
        • Laughlin B.B.
        • Finan M.A.
        • Wang B.
        • Rocconi R.P.
        The trend towards minimally invasive surgery (MIS) for endometrial cancer: an ACS-NSQIP evaluation of surgical outcomes.
        Gynecol Oncol. 2015; 136: 512-515
        • Iavazzo C.
        • Gkegkes I.D.
        Robotic assisted hysterectomy in obese patients: a systematic review.
        Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2016; 293: 1169-1183
        • Orekoya O.
        • Samson M.E.
        • Trivedi T.
        • Vyas S.
        • Steck S.E.
        The impact of obesity on surgical outcome in endometrial cancer patients: a systematic review.
        J Gynecol Surg. 2016; 32: 149-157
        • Park D.A.
        • Lee D.H.
        • Kim S.W.
        • Lee S.H.
        Comparative safety and effectiveness of robot-assisted laparoscopic hysterectomy versus conventional laparoscopy and laparotomy for endometrial cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
        Eur J Surg Oncol. 2016; 42: 1303-1314
        • Xie W.
        • Cao D.
        • Yang J.
        • Shen K.
        • Zhao L.
        Robot-assisted surgery versus conventional laparoscopic surgery for endometrial cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
        J Cancer Res Clin Oncol. 2016; 142: 2173-2183
        • Nevis I.F.
        • Vali B.
        • Higgins C.
        • Dhalla I.
        • Urbach D.
        • Bernardini M.Q.
        Robot-assisted hysterectomy for endometrial and cervical cancers: a systematic review.
        J Robot Surg. 2017; 11: 1-16
        • Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists (RCOG)
        Abdominal hysterectomy for benign conditions: Consent Advice No. 4 London: RCOG.
        (Available at:) (Accessed May 12, 2019)
        • Moga C.
        • Guo B.
        • Schopflocher D.
        • Harstall C.
        Development of a quality appraisal tool for case series studies using a modified delphi technique.
        Institute of Health Economics, Alberta, Canada2012
        • Dossa F.
        • Chesney T.R.
        • Acuna S.A.
        • Baxter N.N.
        A watch-and-wait approach for locally advanced rectal cancer after a clinical complete response following neoadjuvant chemoradiation: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
        Lancet Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2017; 2: 501-513
        • Slessor D.
        • Hunter S.
        To be blunt: are we wasting our time? Emergency Department thoracotomy following blunt trauma: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
        Ann Emerg Med. 2015; 65: 297-307.e16
        • Patel H.
        • Sander B.
        • Nelder M.P.
        Long-term sequelae of West Nile virus-related illness: a systematic review.
        Lancet Infect Dis. 2015; 15: 951-959
        • Wells G.A.
        • Shea B.
        • O’Connell D.
        • et al.
        The Newcastle-Ottawa Scale (NOS) for assessing the quality of nonrandomised studies in meta-analyses.
        Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, Ottawa, Canada2014
        • Li H.T.
        • Zhou Y.B.
        • Liu J.M.
        The impact of cesarean section on offspring overweight and obesity: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
        Int J Obes (Lond). 2013; 37: 893-899
        • Hamza T.H.
        • van Houwelingen H.C.
        • Stijnen T.
        The binomial distribution of meta-analysis was preferred to model within-study variability.
        J Clin Epidemiol. 2008; 61: 41-51
        • Stijnen T.
        • Hamza T.H.
        • Ozdemir P.
        Random effects meta-analysis of event outcome in the framework of the generalized linear mixed model with applications in sparse data.
        Stat Med. 2010; 29: 3046-3067
        • Rizzuto I.
        • Odejinmi F.
        • Al-Samarrai M.
        Can body mass index influence the outcome of a laparoscopic hysterectomy?.
        J Gynecol Surg. 2014; 30: 74-80
        • Peng J.
        • Sinasac S.
        • Pulman K.J.
        • Zhang L.
        • Murphy J.
        • Feigenberg T.
        The feasibility of laparoscopic surgery in gynecologic oncology for obese and morbidly obese patients.
        Int J Gynecol Cancer. 2018; 2: 967-974
        • Backes F.J.
        • Rosen M.
        • Liang M.
        • et al.
        Robotic hysterectomy for endometrial cancer in obese patients with comorbidities: evaluating postoperative complications.
        Int J Gynecol Cancer. 2015; 25: 1271-1276
        • Baek M.H.
        • Lee S.W.
        • Park J.Y.
        • et al.
        Feasibility and safety of laparoscopic surgery for obese Korean women with endometrial cancer: long-term results at a single institution.
        J Korean Med Sci. 2014; 29: 1536-1543
        • Bennich G.
        • Rudnicki M.
        • Lassen P.D.
        Laparoscopic surgery for early endometrial cancer.
        Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2016; 95: 894-900
        • Bernardini M.Q.
        • Gien L.T.
        • Tipping H.
        • Murphy J.
        • Rosen B.P.
        Surgical outcome of robotic surgery in morbidly obese patient with endometrial cancer compared to laparotomy.
        Int J Gynecol Cancer. 2012; 22: 76-81
        • Bige O.
        • Demir A.
        • Saatli B.
        • Koyuncuoglu M.
        • Saygili U.
        Laparoscopy versus laparotomy for the management of endometrial carcinoma in morbidly obese patients: a prospective study.
        J Turk Ger Gynecol Assoc. 2015; 16: 164-169
        • Bijen C.B.
        • de Bock G.H.
        • Vermeulen K.M.
        • et al.
        Laparoscopic hysterectomy is preferred over laparotomy in early endometrial cancer patients, however not cost effective in the very obese.
        Eur J Cancer. 2011; 47: 2158-2165
        • Borgfeldt C.
        • Kalapotharakos G.
        • Asciutto K.C.
        • Lofgren M.
        • Hogberg T.
        A population-based registry study evaluating surgery in newly diagnosed uterine cancer.
        Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2016; 95: 901-911
        • Bouwman F.S.
        • Lopes A.
        • Das N.
        • et al.
        The impact of BMI on surgical complications and outcomes in endometrial cancer surgery: an institutional study and systematic review of the literature.
        Gynecol Oncol. 2015; 139: 369-376
        • Camanni M.
        • Bonino L.
        • Delpiano E.M.
        • Migliaretti G.
        • Berchialla P.
        • Deltetto F.
        Laparoscopy and body mass index: feasibility and outcome in obese patients treated for gynecologic diseases.
        J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2010; 17: 576-582
        • Chan J.K.
        • Gardner A.B.
        • Taylor K.
        • et al.
        Robotic versus laparoscopic versus open surgery in morbidly obese endometrial cancer patients: a comparative analysis of total charges and complication rates.
        Gynecol Oncol. 2015; 139: 300-305
        • Cheng Z.
        • He X.
        • Zhao A.
        • Zhang Q.
        • Li Y.
        Early endometrial carcinoma therapy in morbid obesity: a retrospective study comparing open and laparoscopic.
        Int J Surg. 2016; 30: 31-34
        • Seamon L.G.
        • Bryant S.A.
        • Rheaume P.S.
        • et al.
        Comprehensive surgical staging for endometrial cancer in obese patients: comparing robotics and laparotomy.
        Obstet Gynecol. 2009; 114: 16-21
        • Corrado G.
        • Chiantera V.
        • Fanfani F.
        • et al.
        Robotic hysterectomy in severely obese patients with endometrial cancer: a multicenter study.
        J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2016; 23: 94-100
        • Cunningham M.J.
        • Dorzin E.
        • Nguyen L.
        • Anderson E.
        • Bunn Jr., W.D.
        Body mass index, conversion rate and complications among patients undergoing robotic surgery for endometrial carcinoma.
        J Robot Surg. 2015; 9: 339-345
        • Eisenhauer E.L.
        • Wypych K.A.
        • Mehrara B.J.
        • et al.
        Comparing surgical outcomes in obese women undergoing laparotomy, laparoscopy, or laparotomy with panniculectomy for the staging of uterine malignancy.
        Ann Surg Oncol. 2007; 14: 2384-2391
        • Eltabbakh G.H.
        • Shamonki M.I.
        • Moody J.M.
        • Garafano L.L.
        Hysterectomy for obese women with endometrial cancer: laparoscopy or laparotomy?.
        Gynecol Oncol. 2000; 78: 329-335
        • Fanning J.
        • Hossler C.
        Laparoscopic conversion rate for uterine cancer surgical staging.
        Obstet Gynecol. 2010; 116: 1354-1357
        • Farthing A.
        • Chatterjee J.
        • Joglekar-Pai P.
        • Dorney E.
        • Ghaem-Maghami S.
        Total laparoscopic hysterectomy for early stage endometrial cancer in obese and morbidly obese women.
        J Obstet Gynaecol. 2012; 32: 580-584
        • Gehrig P.A.
        • Cantrell L.A.
        • Shafer A.
        • Abaid L.N.
        • Mendivil A.
        • Boggess J.F.
        What is the optimal minimally invasive surgical procedure for endometrial cancer staging in the obese and morbidly obese woman?.
        Gynecol Oncol. 2008; 111: 41-45
        • Ghezzi F.C.
        • Cromi A.
        • Bergamini V.
        • et al.
        Laparoscopic management of endometrial cancer in nonobese and obese women: a consecutive series.
        J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2006; 13: 269-275
        • Giugale L.E.
        • Di Santo N.
        • Smolkin M.E.
        • Havrilesky L.J.
        • Modesitt S.C.
        Beyond mere obesity: effect of increasing obesity classifications on hysterectomy outcomes for uterine cancer/hyperplasia.
        Gynecol Oncol. 2012; 127: 326-331
        • Helm C.W.
        • Arumugam C.
        • Gordinier M.E.
        • Metzinger D.S.
        • Pan J.
        • Rai S.N.
        Laparoscopic surgery for endometrial cancer: increasing body mass index does not impact postoperative complications.
        J Gynecol Oncol. 2011; 22: 168-176
        • Hinshaw S.J.
        • Gunderson S.
        • Eastwood D.
        • Bradley W.H.
        Endometrial carcinoma: the perioperative and long-term outcomes of robotic surgery in the morbidly obese.
        J Surg Oncol. 2016; 114: 884-887
        • Holub Z.
        • Bartos P.
        • Jabor A.
        • Eim J.
        • Fischlova D.
        • Kliment L.
        Laparoscopic surgery in obese women with endometrial cancer.
        J Am Assoc Gynecol Laparosc. 2000; 7: 83-88
        • Lau S.
        • Buzaglo K.
        • Vaknin Z.
        • et al.
        Relationship between body mass index and robotic surgery outcomes of women diagnosed with endometrial cancer.
        Int J Gynecol Cancer. 2011; 21: 722-729
        • Leitao M.M.
        • Narain W.R.
        • Boccamazzo D.
        • et al.
        Impact of robotic platforms on surgical approach and costs in the management of morbidly obese patients with newly diagnosed uterine cancer.
        Ann Surg Oncol. 2016; 23: 2192-2198
        • Litta P.
        • Fabris A.M.
        • Breda E.
        • et al.
        Laparoscopic surgical staging of endometrial cancer: does obesity influence feasibility and perioperative outcome?.
        Eur J Gynaecol Oncol. 2013; 34: 231-233
        • Matsuo K.
        • Jung C.E.
        • Hom M.S.
        • et al.
        D. Predictive factor of conversion to laparotomy in minimally invasive surgical staging for endometrial cancer.
        Int J Gynecol Cancer. 2016; 26: 290-300
        • Menderes G.
        • Azodi M.
        • Clark L.
        • et al.
        Impact of body mass index on surgical outcomes and analysis of disease recurrence for patients with endometrial cancer undergoing robotic-assisted staging.
        Int J Gynecol Cancer. 2014; 24: 1118-1125
        • Mendivil A.A.
        • Rettenmaier M.A.
        • Abaid L.N.
        • et al.
        A comparison of open surgery, robotic-assisted surgery and conventional laparoscopic surgery in the treatment of morbidly obese endometrial cancer patients.
        J Soc Laparoendosc Surg. 2015; 19 (e2014.00001)
        • Nevadunsky N.
        • Clark R.
        • Ghosh S.
        • et al.
        Comparison of robot-assisted total laparoscopic hysterectomy and total abdominal hysterectomy for treatment of endometrial cancer in obese and morbidly obese patients.
        J Robot Surg. 2010; 4: 247-252
        • Obermair A.
        • Brennan D.J.
        • Baxter E.
        • Armes J.E.
        • Gebski V.
        • Janda M.
        Surgical safety and personal costs in morbidly obese, multimorbid patients diagnosed with early-stage endometrial cancer having a hysterectomy.
        Gynecol Oncol Res Pract. 2016; 3: 1
        • Obermair A.
        • Manolitsas T.P.
        • Leung Y.
        • Hammond I.G.
        • McCartney A.J.
        Total laparoscopic hysterectomy versus total abdominal hysterectomy for obese women with endometrial cancer.
        Int J Gynecol Cancer. 2005; 15: 319-324
        • O’Gorman T.
        • MacDonald N.
        • Mould T.
        • Cutner A.
        • Hurley R.
        • Olaitan A.
        Total laparoscopic hysterectomy in morbidly obese women with endometrial cancer anaesthetic and surgical complications.
        Eur J Gynaecol Oncol. 2009; 30: 171-173
        • O’Hanlan K.A.
        • Dibble S.L.
        • Fisher D.T.
        Total laparoscopic hysterectomy for uterine pathology: impact of body mass index on outcomes.
        Gynecol Oncol. 2006; 103: 938-941
        • Palomba S.
        • Zupi E.
        • Russo T.
        • et al.
        Presurgical assessment of intraabdominal visceral fat in obese patients with early-stage endometrial cancer treated with laparoscopic approach: relationships with early laparotomic conversions.
        J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2007; 14: 195-201
        • Pellegrino A.
        • Signorelli M.
        • Fruscio R.
        • et al.
        Feasibility and morbidity of total laparoscopic radical hysterectomy with or without pelvic limphadenectomy in obese women with stage I endometrial cancer.
        Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2009; 279: 655-660
        • Perrone A.M.
        • Di Marcoberardino B.
        • Rossi M.
        • et al.
        Laparoscopic versus laparotomic approach to endometrial cancer.
        Eur J Gynaecol Oncol. 2012; 33: 376-381
        • Rabischong B.
        • Larrain D.
        • Canis M.
        • et al.
        Long-term follow-up after laparoscopic management of endometrial cancer in the obese: a fifteen-year cohort study.
        J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2011; 18: 589-596
        • Ramzan A.A.
        • Garcia-Sayre J.
        • Hom M.S.
        • et al.
        Relative morbidity and mortality of panniculectomy-combined surgical staging in endometrial cancer.
        Int J Gynecol Cancer. 2015; 25: 1503-1512
        • Santi A.
        • Kuhn A.
        • Gyr T.
        • et al.
        Laparoscopy or laparotomy? A comparison of 240 patients with early-stage endometrial cancer.
        Surg Endosc. 2010; 24: 939-943
        • Scribner Jr., D.R.
        • Walker J.L.
        • Johnson G.A.
        • McMeekin D.S.
        • Gold M.A.
        • Mannel R.S.
        Laparoscopic pelvic and paraaortic lymph node dissection in the obese.
        Gynecol Oncol. 2002; 84: 426-430
        • Stephan J.M.
        • Goodheart M.J.
        • McDonald M.
        • et al.
        Robotic surgery in supermorbidly obese patients with endometrial cancer.
        Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2015; 213: 49.e1-49.e8
        • Subramaniam A.
        • Kim K.H.
        • Bryant S.A.
        • et al.
        A cohort study evaluating robotic versus laparotomy surgical outcomes of obese women with endometrial carcinoma.
        Gynecol Oncol. 2011; 122: 604-607
        • Tang K.Y.
        • Gardiner S.K.
        • Gould C.
        • Osmundsen B.
        • Collins M.
        • Winter 3rd, W.E.
        Robotic surgical staging for obese patients with endometrial cancer.
        Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2012; 206: 513.e1-513.e6
        • Tinelli R.
        • Litta P.
        • Meir Y.
        • et al.
        Advantages of laparoscopy versus laparotomy in extremely obese women (BMI>35) with early-stage endometrial cancer: a multicenter study.
        Anticancer Res. 2014; 34: 2497-2502
        • Uccella S.
        • Bonzini M.
        • Palomba S.
        • et al.
        Impact of obesity on surgical treatment for endometrial cancer: a multicenter study comparing laparoscopy vs open surgery, with propensity-matched analysis.
        J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2016; 23: 53-61
        • Fader A.N.
        • Weise R.M.
        • Sinno A.K.
        • et al.
        Utilization of minimally invasive surgery in endometrial cancer care: a quality and cost disparity.
        Obstet Gynecol. 2016; 127: 91-100
        • Medical Advisory Secretariat
        Robotic-assisted minimally invasive surgery for gynecologic and urologic oncology: an evidence-based analysis.
        Ont Health Technol Assess Ser. 2010; 10: 1-118
        • Leitao Jr., M.M.
        • Bartashnik A.
        • Wagner I.
        • et al.
        Cost-effectiveness analysis of robotically assisted laparoscopy for newly diagnosed uterine cancers.
        Obstet Gynecol. 2014; 123: 1031-1037
        • Kakde A.S.
        • Wagh H.D.
        An observational study: effects of tenting of the abdominal wall on peak airway pressure in robotic radical prostatectomy surgery.
        Saudi J Anaesth. 2017; 11: 279-282
        • Corrado G.
        • Chiantera V.
        • Fanfani F.
        • et al.
        Robotic hysterectomy in severely obese patients with endometrial cancer: a multicenter study..
        J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2016; 23: 94-100
        • Uccella S.
        • Bonzini M.
        • Palomba S.
        • et al.
        Impact of obesity on surgical treatment for endometrial cancer: a multicenter study comparing laparoscopy vs open surgery, with propensity-matched analysis.
        J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2016; 23: 53-61