Advertisement

The World Health Organization fetal growth charts: concept, findings, interpretation, and application

      Ultrasound biometry is an important clinical tool for the identification, monitoring, and management of fetal growth restriction and development of macrosomia. This is even truer in populations in which perinatal morbidity and mortality rates are high, which is a reason that much effort is put onto making the technique available everywhere, including low-income societies. Until recently, however, commonly used reference ranges were based on single populations largely from industrialized countries. Thus, the World Health Organization prioritized the establishment of fetal growth charts for international use. New fetal growth charts for common fetal measurements and estimated fetal weight were based on a longitudinal study of 1387 low-risk pregnant women from 10 countries (Argentina, Brazil, Democratic Republic of Congo, Denmark, Egypt, France, Germany, India, Norway, and Thailand) that provided 8203 sets of ultrasound measurements. The participants were characterized by median age 28 years, 58% nulliparous, normal body mass index, with no socioeconomic or nutritional constraints (median caloric intake, 1840 calories/day), and had the ability to attend the ultrasound sessions, thus essentially representing urban populations. Median gestational age at birth was 39 weeks, and birthweight was 3300 g, both with significant differences among countries. Quantile regression was used to establish the fetal growth charts, which also made it possible to demonstrate a number of features of fetal growth that previously were not well appreciated or unknown: (1) There was an asymmetric distribution of estimated fetal weight in the population. During early second trimester, the distribution was wider among fetuses <50th percentile compared with those above. The pattern was reversed in the third trimester, with a notably wider variation >50th percentile. (2) Although fetal sex, maternal factors (height, weight, age, and parity), and country had significant influence on fetal weight (1–4.5% each), their effect was graded across the percentiles. For example, the positive effect of maternal height on fetal weight was strongest on the lowest percentiles and smallest on the highest percentiles for estimated fetal weight. (3) When adjustment was made for maternal covariates, there was still a significant effect of country as covariate that indicated that ethnic, cultural, and geographic variation play a role. (4) Variation between populations was not restricted to fetal size because there were also differences in growth trajectories. (5) The wide physiologic ranges, as illustrated by the 5th–95th percentile for estimated fetal weight being 2205–3538 g at 37 weeks gestation, signify that human fetal growth under optimized maternal conditions is not uniform. Rather, it has a remarkable variation that largely is unexplained by commonly known factors. We suggest this variation could be part of our common biologic strategy that makes human evolution extremely successful. The World Health Organization fetal growth charts are intended to be used internationally based on low-risk pregnancies from populations in Africa, Asia, Europe, and South America. We consider it prudent to test and monitor whether the growth charts’ performance meets the local needs, because refinements are possible by a change in cut-offs or customization for fetal sex, maternal factors, and populations. In the same line, the study finding of variations emphasizes the need for carefully adjusted growth charts that reflect optimal local growth when public health issues are addressed.

      Key words

      To read this article in full you will need to make a payment

      References

        • Lawn J.E.
        • Cousens S.
        • Zupan J.
        4 Million neonatal deaths: when? where? why?.
        Lancet. 2005; 365: 891-900
        • Katz J.
        • Lee A.C.
        • Kozuki N.
        • et al.
        Mortality risk in preterm and small-for-gestational-age infants in low-income and middle-income countries: a pooled country analysis.
        Lancet. 2013; 382: 417-425
        • Hanson M.A.
        • Gluckman P.D.
        Early developmental conditioning of later health and disease: physiology or pathophysiology?.
        Physiol Rev. 2014; 94: 1027-1076
        • National Collaborating Centre for Women and Children’s Health: National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence: Guidance
        Antenatal care: routine care for the healthy pregnant woman.
        RCOG Press, London2008
        • Zhang J.
        • Merialdi M.
        • Platt L.D.
        • Kramer M.S.
        Defining normal and abnormal fetal growth: promises and challenges.
        Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2010; 202: 522-528
        • Blake K.V.
        • Gurrin L.C.
        • Beilin L.J.
        • et al.
        Prenatal ultrasound biometry related to subsequent blood pressure in childhood.
        J Epidemiol Community Health. 2002; 56: 713-718
        • Kessler J.
        • Rasmussen S.
        • Godfrey K.
        • Hanson M.
        • Kiserud T.
        Venous liver blood flow and regulation of human fetal growth: evidence from macrosomic fetuses.
        Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2011; 204: 429.e1-429.e7
        • Godfrey K.M.
        • Haugen G.
        • Kiserud T.
        • et al.
        Fetal liver blood flow distribution: role in human developmental strategy to prioritize fat deposition versus brain development.
        PLoS One. 2012; 7: e41759
        • Barker D.J.
        • Godfrey K.M.
        • Osmond C.
        • Bull A.
        The relation of fetal length, ponderal index and head circumference to blood pressure and the risk of hypertension in adult life.
        Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol. 1992; 6: 35-44
        • Pike K.C.
        • Crozier S.R.
        • Lucas J.S.
        • et al.
        Patterns of fetal and infant growth are related to atopy and wheezing disorders at age 3 years.
        Thorax. 2010; 65: 1099-1106
        • Hanson M.A.
        • Bardsley A.
        • De-Regil L.M.
        • et al.
        The International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics (FIGO) recommendations on adolescent, preconception, and maternal nutrition: “Think Nutrition First.”.
        Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2015; 131: S213-S253
        • World Health Organization
        Global Health Observatory (GOH) data: neonatal mortality.
        World Health Organization, Geneva2016
        • Aboderin I.
        • Ben-Shlomo Y.
        • Lynch J.
        • Yajnik C.S.
        • Kuh D.
        • Yach D.
        Life course perpectives on coronary heart disease, stroke and diabetes: the evidenceand implications for policy and research.
        World Health organization, Geneva2002
        • World Health Organization
        Child Growth Standards based on length/height, weight and age.
        Acta Paediatr Suppl. 2006; 450: 76-85
        • Merialdi M.
        • Widmer M.
        • Gulmezoglu A.M.
        • et al.
        WHO multicentre study for the development of growth standards from fetal life to childhood: the fetal component.
        BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2014; 14: 157
        • Kiserud T.
        • Piaggio G.
        • Carroli G.
        • et al.
        The World Health Organization fetal growth charts: a multinational longitudinal study of ultrasound biometric measurements and estimated fetal weight.
        PLoS Med. 2017; 14: e1002220
        • Papageorghiou A.T.
        • Ohuma E.O.
        • Altman D.G.
        • et al.
        International standards for fetal growth based on serial ultrasound measurements: the Fetal Growth Longitudinal Study of the INTERGROWTH-21st Project.
        Lancet. 2014; 384: 869-879
        • Stirnemann J.
        • Villar J.
        • Salomon L.J.
        • et al.
        International estimated fetal weight standards of the INTERGROWTH-21st Project.
        Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2017; 49: 478-486
        • Buck Louis G.M.
        • Grewal J.
        • Albert P.S.
        • et al.
        Racial/ethnic standards for fetal growth: the NICHD Fetal Growth Studies.
        Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2015; 213: 449.e1-449.e41
        • Robinson H.P.
        • Fleming J.E.E.
        A critical evaluation of sonar “crown-rump length” measurements.
        BJOG. 1975; 82: 702-710
        • Hadlock F.P.
        • Harrist R.B.
        • Sharman R.S.
        • Deter R.L.
        • Park S.K.
        Estimation of fetal weight with the use of head, body, and femur measurements: a prospective study.
        Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1985; 151: 333-337
        • Wei Y.
        • Pere A.
        • Koenker R.
        • He X.
        Quantile regression methods for reference growth charts.
        Stat Med. 2006; 25: 1369-1382
        • Koenker R.
        • Bassett G.
        Regression quantiles.
        Econometrica. 1978; 46: 33-50
        • Koenker R.
        Quantile regression.
        Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK2005: 342
        • Daniel-Spiegel E.
        • Weiner E.
        • Yarom I.
        • et al.
        Establishment of fetal biometric charts using quantile regression analysis.
        J Ultrasound Med. 2013; 32: 23-33
        • Campbell M.C.
        • Tishkoff S.A.
        African genetic diversity: implications for human demographic history, modern human origins, and complex disease mapping.
        Annu rev genomics hum genet. 2008; 9: 403-433
        • Wulff C.B.
        • Gerds T.A.
        • Rode L.
        • Ekelund C.K.
        • Petersen O.B.
        • Tabor A.
        Risk of fetal loss associated with invasive testing following combined first-trimester screening for Down syndrome: a national cohort of 147,987 singleton pregnancies.
        Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2016; 47: 38-44
        • Ioannou C.
        • Talbot K.
        • Ohuma E.
        • et al.
        Systematic review of methodology used in ultrasound studies aimed at creating charts of fetal size.
        BJOG. 2012; 119: 1425-1439
        • Johnsen S.L.
        • Rasmussen S.
        • Wilsgaard T.
        • Sollien R.
        • Kiserud T.
        Longitudinal reference ranges for estimated fetal weight.
        Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2006; 85: 286-297
        • Thomson A.M.
        • Billewicz W.Z.
        • Hytten F.E.
        The assessment of fetal growth.
        J Obstet Gynaecol Br Commonw. 1968; 75: 903-916
        • Bowley A.L.
        Elements of statistics.
        P. S. King & Son, London1901
        • Mongelli M.
        • Gardosi J.
        Longitudinal study of fetal growth in subgroups of a low-risk population.
        Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 1995; 6: 340-344
        • Bhattacharya S.
        • Campbell D.M.
        • Liston W.A.
        • Bhattacharya S.
        Effect of body mass index on pregnancy outcomes in nulliparous women delivering singleton babies.
        BMC Public Health. 2007; 7: 168
        • Abrams B.F.
        • Laros Jr., R.K.
        Prepregnancy weight, weight gain, and birth weight.
        Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1986; 154: 503-509
        • Amini S.B.
        • Catalano P.M.
        • Hirsch V.
        • Mann L.I.
        An analysis of birth weight by gestational age using a computerized perinatal data base, 1975-1992.
        Obstet Gynecol. 1994; 83: 342-352
        • Brenner W.E.
        • Edelman D.A.
        • Hendricks C.H.
        A standard of fetal growth for the United States of America.
        Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1976; 126: 555-564
      1. Enrolment and baseline characteristics in the WHO Multicentre Growth Reference Study.
        Acta Paediatr Suppl. 2006; 450: 7-15
        • Hanson M.
        • Kiserud T.
        • Visser G.H.
        • Brocklehurst P.
        • Schneider E.B.
        Optimal fetal growth: a misconception?.
        Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2015; 213: 332.e1-332.e4
        • Natale V.
        • Rajagopalan A.
        Worldwide variation in human growth and the World Health Organization growth standards: a systematic review.
        BMJ Open. 2014; 4: e003735
        • Amare E.B.
        • Idsoe M.
        • Wiksnes M.
        • et al.
        Reference ranges for head circumference in Ethiopian children 0–2 years of age.
        World Neurosurg. 2015; 84: 1566-1571.e1-2
        • Milani S.
        • Buckler J.M.
        • Kelnar C.J.
        • et al.
        The use of local reference growth charts for clinical use or a universal standard: a balanced appraisal.
        J Endocrinol Investig. 2012; 35: 224-226
        • Lee A.C.
        • Kozuki N.
        • Cousens S.
        • et al.
        Estimates of burden and consequences of infants born small for gestational age in low and middle income countries with INTERGROWTH-21st standard: analysis of CHERG datasets.
        BMJ. 2017; 358: j3677
        • Villar J.
        • Ismail L.C.
        • Victoria C.G.
        • et al.
        International standards for newborn weight, length, and head circumference by gestational age and sex: Newborn Cross-Sectional Study of the INTERGROWTH-21st PROJECT.
        Lancet. 2014; 384: 857-868
        • Chitty L.S.
        • Altman D.G.
        • Henderson A.
        • Campbell S.
        Charts of fetal size: 3, abdominal measurements.
        BJOG. 1994; 101: 125-131
        • Mikolajczyk R.T.
        • Zhang J.
        • Betran A.P.
        • et al.
        A global reference for fetal-weight and birthweight percentiles.
        Lancet. 2011; 377: 1855-1861
        • Marsál K.
        • Persson P.-H.
        • Larsen T.
        • Lilja H.
        • Selbing A.
        • Sultan B.
        Intrauterine growth curves based on ultrasound estimated foetal weights.
        Acta Paediatr. 1996; 85: 843-848
        • Skjaerven R.
        • Gjessing H.K.
        • Bakketeig L.S.
        Birthweight by gestational age in Norway.
        Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2000; 79: 440-449
        • Gardosi J.
        • Mongelli M.
        • Wilcox M.
        • Chang A.
        An adjustable fetal weight standard.
        Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 1995; 6: 168-174
        • Deter R.L.
        • Lee W.
        • Kingdom J.C.P.
        • Romero R.
        Fetal growth pathology score: a novel ultrasound parameter for individualized assessment of third trimester growth abnormalities.
        J Matern Fetal Neonat Med. 2017; : 1-11
        • Skjaerven R.
        • Gjessing H.K.
        • Bakketeig L.S.
        New standards for birth weight by gestational age using family data.
        Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2000; 183: 689-696
        • Lie R.T.
        • Wilcox A.J.
        • Skjaerven R.
        Maternal and paternal influences on length of pregnancy.
        Obstet Gynecol. 2006; 107: 880-885
        • Owen P.
        • Donnet M.L.
        • Ogston S.A.
        • Christie A.D.
        • Howie P.W.
        • Patel N.B.
        Standards for ultrasound fetal growth velocity.
        BJOG. 1996; 103: 60-69
        • Owen P.
        • Ogston S.
        Conditional centiles for the quantification of fetal growth.
        Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 1998; 11: 110-117
        • Deter R.L.
        • Rossavik I.K.
        A simplified method for determining individual growth curve standards.
        Obstet Gynecol. 1987; 70: 801-806
        • Sovio U.
        • White I.R.
        • Dacey A.
        • Pasupathy D.
        • Smith G.C.S.
        Screening for fetal growth restriction with universal third trimester ultrasonography in nulliparous women in the Pregnancy Outcome Prediction (POP) study: a prospective cohort study.
        Lancet. 2015; 386: 2089-2097
        • Mack L.M.
        • Kim S.Y.
        • Lee S.
        • Sangi-Haghpeykar H.
        • Lee W.
        Automated fractional limb volume measurements improve the precision of birth weight predictions in late third-trimester fetuses.
        J Ultrasound Med. 2017; 36: 1649-1655
        • World Health Organization
        Global action plan for the prevention and control of noncommunicable diseases 2013-2020.
        WHO Press, Geneva2013
        • Villar J.
        • Papageorghiou A.T.
        • Pang R.
        • et al.
        Monitoring human growth and development: a continuum from the womb to the classroom.
        Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2015; 213: 494-499
        • Landis S.H.
        • Ananth C.V.
        • Lokomba V.
        • et al.
        Ultrasound-derived fetal size nomogram for a sub-Saharan African population: a longitudinal study.
        Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2009; 34: 379-386