Advertisement

Surgical outcomes among elderly women with endometrial cancer treated by laparoscopic hysterectomy: a NRG/Gynecologic Oncology Group study

Published:October 13, 2017DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajog.2017.09.026

      Objective

      Tolerance of and complications caused by minimally invasive hysterectomy and staging in the older endometrial cancer population is largely unknown despite the fact that this is the most rapidly growing age group in the United States. The objective of this retrospective review was to compare operative morbidity by age in patients on the Gynecologic Oncology Group Laparoscopic Surgery or Standard Surgery in Treating Patients With Endometrial Cancer or Cancer of the Uterus (LAP2) trial.

      Study Design

      This is a retrospective analysis of patients from Gynecologic Oncology Group LAP2, a trial that included clinically early-stage uterine cancer patients randomized to laparotomy vs laparoscopy for surgical staging. Differences in the rates and types of intraoperative and perioperative complications were compared by age. Specifically complications between patients <60 vs ≥60 years old were compared caused by toxicity analysis showing a sharp increase in toxicity starting at age 60 years in the laparotomy group.

      Results

      LAP2 included 1477 patients ≥60 years old. As expected, with increasing age there was worsening performance status and disease characteristics including higher rates of serous histology, high-stage disease, and lymphovascular space invasion. There was no significant difference in lymph node dissection rate by age for the entire population or within the laparotomy or laparoscopy groups. Toxicity analysis showed a sharp increase in toxicity seen in patients ≥60 years old in the laparotomy group. Further analysis showed that when comparing laparotomy with laparoscopy in patients <60 years old vs ≥60 years old and controlling for race, body mass index, stage, grade, and performance status, patients <60 years old undergoing laparotomy had more hospital stays >2 days (odds ratio, 17.48; 95% confidence interval, 11.71–27.00, P < .001) compared with patients <60 years old undergoing laparoscopy. However, when comparing laparotomy with laparoscopy in patients ≥60 years old, in addition to hospital stay >2 days (odds ratio, 12.77; 95% confidence interval, 8.74–19.32, P < .001), there were higher rates of the following postoperative complications: antibiotic administration (odds ratio, 1.63; 95% confidence interval, 1.24–2.14, P < .001), ileus (odds ratio, 2.16; 95% confidence interval, 1.42–3.31, P <0.001), pneumonias (odds ratio, 2.36; 95% confidence interval, 1.01–5.66, P = .048), deep vein thromboses (odds ratio, 2.87; 95% confidence interval, 1.08–8.03, P = .035), and arrhythmias (odds ratio, 3.21; 95% confidence interval, 1.60–6.65, P = .001) in the laparotomy group.

      Conclusion

      Laparoscopic staging for uterine cancer is associated with decreased morbidity in the immediate postoperative period in patients ≥60 years old. These results allow for more accurate preoperative counseling. A minimally invasive approach to uterine cancer staging may decrease morbidity that could affect long-term survival.

      Key words

      To read this article in full you will need to make a payment

      Purchase one-time access:

      Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online access
      One-time access price info
      • For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
      • For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'

      Subscribe:

      Subscribe to American Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology
      Already a print subscriber? Claim online access
      Already an online subscriber? Sign in
      Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect

      References

        • Siegel R.L.
        • Miller K.D.
        • Jemal A.
        Cancer statistics, 2017.
        CA Cancer J Clin. 2017; 67: 7-30
        • Wright J.D.
        • Lewin S.N.
        • Barrena Medel N.I.
        • et al.
        Morbidity and mortality of surgery for endometrial cancer in the oldest old.
        Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2011; 205: 66.e1-66.e8
        • Veldkamp R.
        • Kuhry E.
        • Hop W.C.
        • et al.
        Laparoscopic surgery versus open surgery for colon cancer: short-term outcomes of a randomised trial.
        Lancet Oncol. 2005; 6: 477-484
        • Smith Jr., J.A.
        • Chan R.C.
        • Chang S.S.
        • et al.
        A comparison of the incidence and location of positive surgical margins in robotic assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy and open retropubic radical prostatectomy.
        J Urol. 2007; 178 (discussion 2389-90): 2385-2389
        • Janda M.
        • Gebski V.
        • Davies L.C.
        • et al.
        Effect of total laparoscopic hysterectomy vs total abdominal hysterectomy on disease-free survival among women with stage I endometrial cancer: a randomized clinical trial.
        JAMA. 2017; 317: 1224-1233
        • Bogani G.
        • Cromi A.
        • Uccella S.
        • et al.
        Perioperative and long-term outcomes of laparoscopic, open abdominal, and vaginal surgery for endometrial cancer in patients aged 80 years or older.
        Int J Gynecol Cancer. 2014; 24: 894-900
        • Guy M.S.
        • Sheeder J.
        • Behbakht K.
        • Wright J.D.
        • Guntupalli S.R.
        Comparative outcomes in older and younger women undergoing laparotomy or robotic surgical staging for endometrial cancer.
        Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2016; 214: 350.e1-350.e10
        • Backes F.J.
        • ElNaggar A.C.
        • Farrell M.R.
        • et al.
        Perioperative outcomes for laparotomy compared to robotic surgical staging of endometrial cancer in the elderly: a retrospective cohort.
        Int J Gynecol Cancer. 2016; 26: 1717-1721
        • Doo D.W.
        • Guntupalli S.R.
        • Corr B.R.
        • et al.
        Comparative surgical outcomes for endometrial cancer patients 65 years old or older staged with robotics or laparotomy.
        Annals of Surgical Oncology. 2015; 22: 3687-3694
        • Walker J.L.
        • Piedmonte M.R.
        • Spirtos N.M.
        • et al.
        Laparoscopy compared with laparotomy for comprehensive surgical staging of uterine cancer: Gynecologic Oncology Group Study LAP2.
        J Clin Oncol. 2009; 27: 5331-5336
        • Walker J.L.
        • Piedmonte M.R.
        • Spirtos N.M.
        • et al.
        Recurrence and survival after random assignment to laparoscopy versus laparotomy for comprehensive surgical staging of uterine cancer: Gynecologic Oncology Group LAP2 Study.
        J Clin Oncol. 2012; 30 ([Erratum appears in J Clin Oncol 2012;30:1570]): 695-700
      1. Pearson K. On the criterion that a given system of deviations from the probable in the case of a correlated system of variables is such that it can be reasonably supposed to have arisen from random sampling. Philosophical Magazine Vol 51;900:157-75.

        • Whitney D.
        • Mann H.
        On a test of whether one of two random variables is stochastically larger than the other.
        Ann Math Stat. 1947; 18: 50-60
        • Kruskal W.
        • Wallis W.
        Use of ranks in one-criterion variance analysis.
        J Am Stat Assoc. 1952; 47: 583-621
        • Harrell F.
        Regression modeling strategies, with applications to linear models, survival analysis and logistic regression.
        Springer, New York2001
      2. R Foundation for Statistical Computing. R Core Team. A language and environment for statistical computing, 2013. Available at: http://www.R-project.org/. Accessed March 13, 2013.

        • Tan W.S.
        • Chew M.H.
        • Lim I.A.
        • Ng K.H.
        • Tang C.L.
        • Eu K.W.
        Evaluation of laparoscopic versus open colorectal surgery in elderly patients more than 70 years old: an evaluation of 727 patients.
        Int J Colorect Dis. 2012; 27: 773-780
        • Khuri S.F.
        • Henderson W.G.
        • DePalma R.G.
        • et al.
        Determinants of long-term survival after major surgery and the adverse effect of postoperative complications.
        Ann Surg. 2005; 242 (discussion 341-43): 326-341
        • Rossi E.C.
        • Kowalski L.D.
        • Scalici J.
        • et al.
        A comparison of sentinel lymph node biopsy to lymphadenectomy for endometrial cancer staging (FIRES trial): a multicentre, prospective, cohort study.
        Lancet Oncol. 2017; 18: 384-392
        • Chen S.H.
        • Li Z.A.
        • Huang R.
        • Xue H.Q.
        Robot-assisted versus conventional laparoscopic surgery for endometrial cancer staging: a meta-analysis.
        Taiwan J Obstet Gynecol. 2016; 55: 488-494