Advertisement

Research to knowledge: promoting the training of physician-scientists in the biology of pregnancy

Published:October 06, 2017DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajog.2017.09.024
      Common disorders of pregnancy, such as preeclampsia, preterm birth, and fetal growth abnormalities, continue to challenge perinatal biologists seeking insights into disease pathogenesis that will result in better diagnosis, therapy, and disease prevention. These challenges have recently been intensified with discoveries that associate gestational diseases with long-term maternal and neonatal outcomes. Whereas modern high-throughput investigative tools enable scientists and clinicians to noninvasively probe the maternal-fetal genome, epigenome, and other analytes, their implications for clinical medicine remain uncertain. Bridging these knowledge gaps depends on strengthening the existing pool of scientists with expertise in basic, translational, and clinical tools to address pertinent questions in the biology of pregnancy. Although PhD researchers are critical in this quest, physician-scientists would facilitate the inquiry by bringing together clinical challenges and investigative tools, promoting a culture of intellectual curiosity among clinical providers, and helping transform discoveries into relevant knowledge and clinical solutions. Uncertainties related to future administration of health care, federal support for research, attrition of physician-scientists, and an inadequate supply of new scholars may jeopardize our ability to address these challenges. New initiatives are necessary to attract current scholars and future generations of researchers seeking expertise in the scientific method and to support them, through mentorship and guidance, in pursuing a career that combines scientific investigation with clinical medicine. These efforts will promote breadth and depth of inquiry into the biology of pregnancy and enhance the pace of translation of scientific discoveries into better medicine and disease prevention.
      To read this article in full you will need to make a payment

      Purchase one-time access:

      Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online access
      One-time access price info
      • For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
      • For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'

      Subscribe:

      Subscribe to American Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology
      Already a print subscriber? Claim online access
      Already an online subscriber? Sign in
      Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect

      References

        • Pearse W.H.
        • Graham K.K.
        Trends in obstetric-gynecologic academic manpower and research.
        Obstet Gynecol. 1991; 78: 141-143
        • Institute of Medicine Committee on Research Capabilities of Academic Departments of Obstetrics and Gynecology
        The National Academies Collection: reports funded by National Institutes of Health.
        in: Townsend J. Strengthening research in academic OB/GYN departments. National Academies Press, Washington (DC)1992
        • Jaffe R.B.
        Is the academic physician-scientist an oxymoron in contemporary obstetrics and gynecology?.
        Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1997; 177: 892-893
      1. Blue Ridge Institute for Medical Research. Ranking tables of NIH funding to US medical schools in 2016. Available at: http://www.brimr.org/NIH_Awards/2016/NIH_Awards_2016.htm. Accessed July 11, 2017.

      2. National Institutes of Health. Research project grants: success rates by medical school department name. Available at: https://report.nih.gov/success_rates/. Accessed July 11, 2017.

        • Paik J.C.
        • Howard G.
        • Lorenz R.G.
        Postgraduate choices of graduates from medical scientist training programs, 2004-2008.
        JAMA. 2009; 302: 1271-1273
        • Brass L.F.
        • Akabas M.H.
        • Burnley L.D.
        • Engman D.M.
        • Wiley C.A.
        • Andersen O.S.
        Are MD-PhD programs meeting their goals? An analysis of career choices made by graduates of 24 MD-PhD programs.
        Acad Med. 2010; 85: 692-701
        • Longo L.D.
        • Mcclure M.E.
        • Jaffe R.B.
        Reproductive physician-scientists for the twenty-first century.
        Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1999; 181: 934-939
        • Longo L.D.
        • Jaffe R.B.
        A challenge for the 21st century: whither physician-scientists in obstetrics, gynecology, and the reproductive sciences?.
        Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2008; 198: 489-495
        • Barker D.J.
        The origins of the developmental origins theory.
        J Intern Med. 2007; 261: 412-417
        • Gluckman P.D.
        • Hanson M.A.
        Developmental plasticity and human disease: research directions.
        J Intern Med. 2007; 261: 461-471
        • Barker D.J.
        • Thornburg K.L.
        The obstetric origins of health for a lifetime.
        Clin Obstet Gynecol. 2013; 56: 511-519
        • Rodgers A.B.
        • Bale T.L.
        Germ cell origins of posttraumatic stress disorder risk: the transgenerational impact of parental stress experience.
        Biol Psychiatry. 2015; 78: 307-314
        • Tang W.W.
        • Kobayashi T.
        • Irie N.
        • Dietmann S.
        • Surani M.A.
        Specification and epigenetic programming of the human germ line.
        Nat Rev Genet. 2016; 17: 585-600
        • Milewicz D.M.
        • Lorenz R.G.
        • Dermody T.S.
        • Brass L.F.
        National Association of MD-PhD Programs Executive Committee. Rescuing the physician-scientist workforce: the time for action is now.
        J Clin Invest. 2015; 125: 3742-3747
      3. Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development. Review of NICHD training and career development programs. Available at: https://www.nichd.nih.gov/training/extramural/Documents/NICHD_training_review.pdf. Accessed Aug. 28, 2017.

        • Okeigwe I.
        • Wang C.
        • Politch J.A.
        • Heffner L.J.
        • Kuohung W.
        Physician-scientists in obstetrics and gynecology: predictors of success in obtaining independent research funding.
        Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2017; 217: 84.e1-84.e8
      4. National Institutes of Health. Physician-scientist Workforce (PSW) Working Group Report. Available at: http://acd.od.nih.gov/reports/PSW_Report_ACD_06042014.pdf. Accessed Aug. 28, 2017.

        • Sadovsky Y.
        • Esplin M.S.
        • Garite T.J.
        • et al.
        Advancing research transdisciplinarity within our discipline.
        Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2014; 211: 205-207