An evaluation of two equations for predicting fetal weight by ultrasound

      This paper is only available as a PDF. To read, Please Download here.
      In an earlier study we presented a method of determining fetal weight from ultrasound measurements of abdominal circumference (AC) and biparietal diameter (BPD). From an equation with these two measurements as independent variables we generated tables of estimated fetal weights (E1). Although these tables have been very useful, we had the impression we were underestimating fetal weight. Therefore, we reconsidered an earlier unpublished table generated from a different equation (E2). While most estimates from E1 and E2 were likely to be within 10% of actual weight, there was significant underestimation with E1. E2 provides a better balance between the distribution of overestimations and underestimations.
      To read this article in full you will need to make a payment

      Purchase one-time access:

      Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online access
      One-time access price info
      • For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
      • For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'


      Subscribe to American Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology
      Already a print subscriber? Claim online access
      Already an online subscriber? Sign in
      Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect


        • Warsol S.L.
        • Gohari P.
        • Berkowitz R.L.
        • Hobbins J.C.
        The estimation of fetal weight by computer-assisted analysis.
        Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol. 1977; 128: 881
      1. Deter. R.: Personal communication.