Advertisement

Metroplasty to treat chronic pelvic pain resulting from outflow tract müllerian anomalies

Published:September 09, 2015DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajog.2015.09.007
      Chronic pelvic pain can result from noncommunicating uterine cavities in patients with müllerian anomalies. Traditional management has been to resect the noncommunicating uterine horn. Two cases are described. One had a unicornuate uterus with noncommunicating left uterine horn (American Fertility Society [AFS] classification IIb) and the other had a normal external uterine contour with noncommunicating left uterine cavity that did not fit any category of the AFS classification of müllerian anomalies. Attempts at connecting the noncommunicating cavities hysteroscopically failed in both cases. Successful unification of the cavities was subsequently achieved in the first case using the classic Strassman metroplasty with the assistance of the robot. The unification of uterine cavities was achieved using a modified Strassman metroplasty in the second patient, as there was no uterine horn for landmark. Robot assistance was utilized in this case as well. Both patients are symptom free after surgery. We conclude that laparoscopic Strassman metroplasty, with or without robot assistance, is a viable alternative to resection of uterine horns in patients with hematometra, chronic pelvic pain, and noncommunicating uterine cavities.
      To read this article in full you will need to make a payment

      Purchase one-time access:

      Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online access
      One-time access price info
      • For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
      • For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'

      Subscribe:

      Subscribe to American Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology
      Already a print subscriber? Claim online access
      Already an online subscriber? Sign in
      Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect

      References

        • Sanfilippo J.
        Strassman procedure for correction of a class II müllerian anomaly in an adolescent.
        J Adolesc Health. 1991; 12: 63-66
        • Saso S.
        • Chatterjee J.
        • Yazbek J.
        • et al.
        A case of pregnancy following a modified Strassman procedure applied to treat a placental site trophoblastic tumor.
        BJOG. 2012; 119: 1665-1667
        • Sieunarine K.1
        • Cowie A.S.
        • Bartlett J.D.
        • Lindsay I.
        • Smith J.R.
        A novel approach in the management of a recurrent adenomatoid tumor of the uterus utilizing a Strassman technique.
        Int J Gynecol Cancer. 2005; 15: 671-675
        • Tomasz R.
        • Marta M.
        • Aleksandra B.
        Clinical effectiveness of Strassman operation in the treatment of bicornuate uterus.
        Ginekol Pol. 2009; 80: 88-92
      1. Wheeless C, Roenneburg M. Jones operation for correction of double uterus. Atlas of pelvic surgery. Available at: http://www.atlasofpelvicsurgery.com/5Uterus/6JonesOperationforCorrectionofDoubleUterus/chap5sec6.html. Accessed June 1, 2015.

        • Koo Y.J.
        • Lee J.K.
        • Lee Y.K.
        • et al.
        Pregnancy outcomes and risk factors for uterine rupture after laparoscopic myomectomy: a single center experience and literature review.
        J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2015; 22: 1022-1028