Advertisement

Characterization of the host inflammatory response following implantation of prolapse mesh in rhesus macaque

Published:August 07, 2015DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajog.2015.08.002

      Objective

      We sought to determine the predominant cell type (macrophage, T lymphocyte, B lymphocyte, mast cell) within the area of implantation of the prototypical polypropylene mesh, Gynemesh PS (Ethicon, Somerville, NJ); and to determine the phenotypic profile (M1 proinflammatory, M2 antiinflammatory) of the macrophage response to 3 different polypropylene meshes: Gynemesh PS (Ethicon), and 2 lower-weight, higher-porosity meshes, UltraPro (Ethicon) and Restorelle (Coloplast, Humblebaek, Denmark).

      Study Design

      Sacrocolpopexy was performed following hysterectomy in rhesus macaques. Sham-operated animals served as controls. At 12 weeks postsurgery, the vagina-mesh complex was excised and the host inflammatory response was evaluated. Hematoxylin and eosin was used to perform routine histomorphologic evaluation. Identification of leukocyte (CD45+) subsets was performed by immunolabeling for CD68 (macrophage), CD3 (T lymphocyte), CD20 (B lymphocyte), and CD117 (mast cell). M1 and M2 macrophage subsets were identified using immunolabeling (CD86+ and CD206+, respectively), and further evaluation was performed using enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay for 2 M1 (tumor necrosis factor-alpha and interleukin [IL]-12) and 2 M2 (IL-4 and IL-10) cytokines.

      Results

      Histomorphologic evaluation showed a dense cellular response surrounding each mesh fiber. CD45+ leukocytes accounted for 21.4 ± 5.4% of total cells within the perimesh area captured in a ×20 field, with macrophages as the predominant leukocyte subset (10.5 ± 3.9% of total cells) followed by T lymphocytes (7.3 ± 1.7%), B lymphocytes (3.0 ± 1.2%), and mast cells (0.2 ± 0.2%). The response was observed to be more diffuse with increasing distance from the fiber surface. Few leukocytes of any type were observed in sham-operated animals. Immunolabeling revealed polarization of the macrophage response toward the M1 phenotype in all mesh groups. However, the ratio of M2:M1 macrophages was increased in the fiber area in UltraPro (P = .033) and Restorelle (P = .016) compared to Gynemesh PS. In addition, a shift toward increased expression of the antiinflammatory cytokine IL-10 was observed in Restorelle as compared to Gynemesh PS (P = .011).

      Conclusion

      The host response to mesh consists predominantly of activated, proinflammatory M1 macrophages at 12 weeks postsurgery. However, this response is attenuated with implantation of lighter-weight, higher-porosity mesh. While additional work is required to establish causal relationships, these results suggest a link among the host inflammatory response, mesh textile properties, and clinical outcomes in the repair of pelvic organ prolapse.

      Key words

      To read this article in full you will need to make a payment

      Purchase one-time access:

      Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online access
      One-time access price info
      • For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
      • For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'

      Subscribe:

      Subscribe to American Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology
      Already a print subscriber? Claim online access
      Already an online subscriber? Sign in
      Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect

      References

        • Subak L.L.
        • Waetjen L.E.
        • van den Eeden S.
        • Thom D.H.
        • Vittinghoff E.
        • Brown J.S.
        Cost of pelvic organ prolapse surgery in the United States.
        Obstet Gynecol. 2001; 98: 646-651
        • Boyles S.H.
        • Weber A.M.
        • Meyn L.
        Procedures for pelvic organ prolapse in the United States, 1979-1997.
        Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2003; 188: 108-115
        • Wu J.M.
        • Kawasaki A.
        • Hundley A.F.
        • Dieter A.A.
        • Myers E.R.
        • Sung V.W.
        Predicting the number of women who will undergo incontinence and prolapse surgery, 2010 to 2050.
        Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2011; 205: 230.e1-230.e5
        • Barber M.D.
        • Brubaker L.
        • Burgio K.L.
        • et al.
        Comparison of 2 transvaginal surgical approaches and perioperative behavioral therapy for apical vaginal prolapse: the OPTIMAL randomized trial.
        JAMA. 2014; 311: 1023-1034
        • Olsen A.L.
        • Smith V.J.
        • Bergstrom J.O.
        • Colling J.C.
        • Clark A.L.
        Epidemiology of surgically managed pelvic organ prolapse and urinary incontinence.
        Obstet Gynecol. 1997; 89: 501-506
        • Jonsson Funk M.
        • Edenfield A.L.
        • Pate V.
        • Visco A.G.
        • Weidner A.C.
        • Wu J.M.
        Trends in use of surgical mesh for pelvic organ prolapse.
        Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2013; 208: 79.e1-79.e7
        • Altman D.
        • Vayrynen T.
        • Engh M.E.
        • et al.
        Anterior colporrhaphy versus transvaginal mesh for pelvic-organ prolapse.
        N Engl J Med. 2011; 364: 1826-1836
        • Diwadkar G.B.
        • Barber M.D.
        • Feiner B.
        • Maher C.
        • Jelovsek J.E.
        Complication and reoperation rates after apical vaginal prolapse surgical repair: a systematic review.
        Obstet Gynecol. 2009; 113: 367-373
        • Feiner B.
        • Jelovsek J.E.
        • Maher C.
        Efficacy and safety of transvaginal mesh kits in the treatment of prolapse of the vaginal apex: a systematic review.
        BJOG. 2009; 116: 15-24
        • Maher C.M.
        • Feiner B.
        • Baessler K.
        • Glazener C.M.
        Surgical management of pelvic organ prolapse in women: the updated summary version Cochrane review.
        Int Urogynecol J. 2011; 22: 1445-1457
      1. Food and Drug Administration. Urogynecologic Surgical Mesh: Update on the Safety and Effectiveness of Transvaginal Placement for Pelvic Organ Prolapse. FDA Administration E. 2001. Available at: http://www.fda.gov/MedicalDevices/Safety/AlertsandNotices/ucm262435.htm. Accessed April 1, 2015.

        • Feola A.
        • Abramowitch S.
        • Jallah Z.
        • et al.
        Deterioration in biomechanical properties of the vagina following implantation of a high-stiffness prolapse mesh.
        BJOG. 2013; 120: 224-232
        • Liang R.
        • Abramowitch S.
        • Knight K.
        • et al.
        Vaginal degeneration following implantation of synthetic mesh with increased stiffness.
        BJOG. 2013; 120: 233-243
        • Liang R.
        • Zong W.
        • Palcsey S.
        • Abramowitch S.
        • Moalli P.A.
        Impact of prolapse meshes on the metabolism of vaginal extracellular matrix in rhesus macaque.
        Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2015; 212: 174.e1-174.e7
        • Mistrangelo E.
        • Mancuso S.
        • Nadalini C.
        • Lijoi D.
        • Costantini S.
        Rising use of synthetic mesh in transvaginal pelvic reconstructive surgery: a review of the risk of vaginal erosion.
        J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2007; 14: 564-569
        • Kohli N.
        • Walsh P.M.
        • Roat T.W.
        • Karram M.M.
        Mesh erosion after abdominal sacrocolpopexy.
        Obstet Gynecol. 1998; 92: 999-1004
        • Brown B.N.
        • Badylak S.F.
        Expanded applications, shifting paradigms and an improved understanding of host-biomaterial interactions.
        Acta Biomater. 2013; 9: 4948-4955
        • Brown B.N.
        • Londono R.
        • Tottey S.
        • et al.
        Macrophage phenotype as a predictor of constructive remodeling following the implantation of biologically derived surgical mesh materials.
        Acta Biomater. 2012; 8: 978-987
        • Mantovani A.
        • Sica A.
        • Sozzani S.
        • Allavena P.
        • Vecchi A.
        • Locati M.
        The chemokine system in diverse forms of macrophage activation and polarization.
        Trends Immunol. 2004; 25: 677-686
        • Mills C.D.
        • Kincaid K.
        • Alt J.M.
        • Heilman M.J.
        • Hill A.M.
        M-1/M-2 macrophages and the Th1/Th2 paradigm.
        J Immunol. 2000; 164: 6166-6173
        • Mosser D.M.
        • Edwards J.P.
        Exploring the full spectrum of macrophage activation.
        Nat Rev Immunol. 2008; 8: 958-969
        • Madden L.R.
        • Mortisen D.J.
        • Sussman E.M.
        • et al.
        Proangiogenic scaffolds as functional templates for cardiac tissue engineering.
        Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2010; 107: 15211-15216
        • Rao A.J.
        • Gibon E.
        • Ma T.
        • Yao Z.
        • Smith R.L.
        • Goodman S.B.
        Revision joint replacement, wear particles, and macrophage polarization.
        Acta Biomater. 2012; 8: 2815-2823
        • Sussman E.M.
        • Halpin M.C.
        • Muster J.
        • Moon R.T.
        • Ratner B.D.
        Porous implants modulate healing and induce shifts in local macrophage polarization in the foreign body reaction.
        Ann Biomed Eng. 2014; 42: 1508-1516
        • Brown B.N.
        • Ratner B.D.
        • Goodman S.B.
        • Amar S.
        • Badylak S.F.
        Macrophage polarization: an opportunity for improved outcomes in biomaterials and regenerative medicine.
        Biomaterials. 2012; 33: 3792-3802
        • Feola A.
        • Barone W.
        • Moalli P.
        • Abramowitch S.
        Characterizing the ex vivo textile and structural properties of synthetic prolapse mesh products.
        Int Urogynecol J. 2013; 24: 559-564
        • Maher C.
        • Feiner B.
        • Baessler K.
        • Schmid C.
        Surgical management of pelvic organ prolapse in women.
        Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2013; 4: CD004014
        • Wolf M.T.
        • Dearth C.L.
        • Ranallo C.A.
        • et al.
        Macrophage polarization in response to ECM coated polypropylene mesh.
        Biomaterials. 2014; 35: 6838-6849
        • Feola A.
        • Abramowitch S.
        • Jones K.
        • Stein S.
        • Moalli P.
        Parity impacts vaginal mechanical properties and collagen structure in rhesus macaques.
        Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2010; 203: 595.e1-595.e8
        • Conze J.
        • Rosch R.
        • Klinge U.
        • et al.
        Polypropylene in the intra-abdominal position: influence of pore size and surface area.
        Hernia. 2004; 8: 365-372
        • Klinge U.
        • Junge K.
        • Stumpf M.
        • Ap A.P.
        • Klosterhalfen B.
        Functional and morphological evaluation of a low-weight, monofilament polypropylene mesh for hernia repair.
        J Biomed Mater Res. 2002; 63: 129-136
        • Klinge U.
        • Klosterhalfen B.
        • Birkenhauer V.
        • Junge K.
        • Conze J.
        • Schumpelick V.
        Impact of polymer pore size on the interface scar formation in a rat model.
        J Surg Res. 2002; 103: 208-214
        • Klinge U.
        • Park J.K.
        • Klosterhalfen B.
        The ideal mesh?.
        Pathobiology. 2013; 80: 169-175
        • Brown B.N.
        • Sicari B.M.
        • Badylak S.F.
        Rethinking regenerative medicine: a macrophage-centered approach.
        Front Immunol. 2014; 5: 510
        • Murray P.J.
        • Allen J.E.
        • Biswas S.K.
        • et al.
        Macrophage activation and polarization: nomenclature and experimental guidelines.
        Immunity. 2014; 41: 14-20