Purchase one-time access:Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online access
One-time access price info
- For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
- For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'
Subscribe:Subscribe to American Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology
- Early pregnancy failure—current management concepts.Obstet Gynecol Surv. 2001; 56: 105-113
- Patient preferences, satisfaction, and resource use in office evacuation of early pregnancy failure.Obstet Gynecol. 2006; 108: 103-110
- Misoprostol versus curettage in women with early pregnancy failure: impact on women’s health-related quality of life. A randomized controlled trial.Hum Reprod. 2005; 20: 2340-2347
- Manual vacuum aspiration, a safe and effective alternative in early pregnancy termination.Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2001; 80: 563-567
- Manual vacuum aspiration: a safe alternative for the surgical management of early pregnancy loss.BJOG. 2009; 116: 1268-1271
- A randomized study comparing efficacy and patient satisfaction in medical or surgical treatment of miscarriage.Fertil Steril. 2006; 86: 367-372
- Expectant, medical, or surgical management of first-trimester miscarriage: a meta-analysis.Obstet Gynecol. 2005; 105: 1104-1113
- Management of miscarriage: expectant, medical, or surgical? Results of randomised controlled trial (miscarriage treatment [MIST] trial).BMJ. 2006; 332: 1235-1240
- Expectant management versus surgical evacuation in first trimester miscarriage: health-related quality of life in randomized and non-randomized patients.Hum Reprod. 2002; 17: 1638-1642
- A comparison of medical management with misoprostol and surgical management for early pregnancy failure.N Engl J Med. 2005; 353: 761-769
- Treatment patterns for early pregnancy failure in Michigan.J Womens Health (Larchmt). 2009; 18: 787-793
- Provider knowledge, attitudes, and treatment preferences for early pregnancy failure.Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2010; 202: 531.e1-531.e8
- Patient acceptability of manual versus electric vacuum aspiration for early pregnancy loss.J Womens Health (Larchmt). 2007; 16: 1429-1436
- Women’s preferences for misoprostol in case of early pregnancy failure.Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2006; 124: 184-186
- Patient preferences for management of first-trimester incomplete spontaneous abortion.J Am Board Fam Pract. 2000; 13: 333-337
- Women’s preferences for attributes of first-trimester miscarriage management: a stated preference discrete-choice experiment.Value Health. 2009; 12: 551-559
- Expectant, medical or surgical treatment for spontaneous abortion in first trimester of pregnancy: a cost analysis.Hum Reprod. 2005; 20: 2873-2878
- Economic evaluation of alternative management methods of first-trimester miscarriage based on results from the MIST trial.BJOG. 2006; 113: 879-889
- Management strategies for abnormal early pregnancy: a cost-effectiveness analysis.J Reprod Med. 2005; 50: 486-490
- A cost-effectiveness analysis of surgical versus medical management of early pregnancy loss.Fertil Steril. 2012; 97: 355-360
- Counseling women with early pregnancy failure: utilizing evidence, preserving preference.Patient Educ Counsel. 2010; 81: 454-461
- The role of patient preferences in cost-effectiveness analysis: a conflict of values?.Pharmacoeconomics. 2009; 27: 705-712
- Mifepristone and misoprostol for early pregnancy failure: a cohort analysis.Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2011; 204: 386.e1-386.e6
- Outcome of expectant management of spontaneous first trimester miscarriage: observational study.BMJ. 2002; 324: 873-875
- Medical treatment for early fetal death (less than 24 weeks).Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2006; : CD002253
- Expectant care versus surgical treatment for miscarriage.Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2012; : CD003518
- Treatment of early pregnancy failure: does induced abortion training affect later practices?.Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2011; 204: 493
V.K.D. and this project were supported by grant 1 K08 JS015491 from the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality .
V.K.D. received payments from the University of California, San Francisco, to provide content expertise during the development of a web-based educational program on early pregnancy failure. The other authors report no conflict of interest.
Cite this article as: Dalton VK, Liang A, Hutton DW, et al. Beyond usual care: the economic consequences of expanding treatment options in early pregnancy loss. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2015;212:177.e1-6.