Maternal morbidity in patients with morbidly adherent placenta treated with and without a standardized multidisciplinary approach

Published:September 04, 2014DOI:


      The purpose of this study was to test the hypothesis that a standardized multidisciplinary treatment approach in patients with morbidly adherent placenta, which includes accreta, increta, and percreta, is associated with less maternal morbidity than when such an approach is not used (nonmultidisciplinary approach).

      Study Design

      A retrospective cohort study was conducted with patients from 3 tertiary care hospitals from July 2000 to September 2013. Patients with histologically confirmed placenta accreta, increta, and percreta were included in this study. A formal program that used a standardized multidisciplinary management approach was introduced in 2011. Before 2011, patients were treated on a case-by-case basis by individual physicians without a specific protocol (nonmultidisciplinary group). Estimated blood loss, transfusion of packed red blood cells, intraoperative complications (eg, vascular, bladder, ureteral, and bowel injury), neonatal outcome, and maternal postoperative length of hospital stay were compared between the 2 groups.


      Of 90 patients with placenta accreta, 57 women (63%) were in the multidisciplinary group, and 33 women (37%) were in the nonmultidisciplinary group. The multidisciplinary group had more cases with percreta (P = .008) but experienced less estimated blood loss (P = .025), with a trend to fewer blood transfusions (P = .06), and were less likely to be delivered emergently (P = .001) compared with the nonmultidisciplinary group. Despite an approach of indicated preterm delivery at 34-35 weeks of gestation, neonatal outcomes were similar between the 2 groups.


      The institution of a standardized approach for patients with morbidly adherent placentation by a specific multidisciplinary team was associated with improved maternal outcomes, particularly in cases with more aggressive placental invasion (increta or percreta), compared with a historic nonmultidisciplinary approach. Our standardized approach was associated with fewer emergency deliveries.

      Key words

      To read this article in full you will need to make a payment

      Purchase one-time access:

      Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online access
      One-time access price info
      • For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
      • For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'


      Subscribe to American Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology
      Already a print subscriber? Claim online access
      Already an online subscriber? Sign in
      Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect


        • Belfort M.A.
        Placenta accreta.
        Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2010; 20: 430-439
        • Hull A.D.
        • Moore T.R.
        Multiple repeat cesareans and the threat of placenta accreta: incidence, diagnosis, management.
        Clin Perinatol. 2011; 38: 285-296
        • Clark S.L.
        • Belfort M.A.
        • Dildy G.A.
        • Herbst M.A.
        • Meyers J.A.
        • Hankins G.D.
        Maternal death in the 21st century: causes, prevention, and relationship to cesarean delivery.
        Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2008; 199 (discussion 91-2.e7-11): 36.e1-36.e5
        • Committee on Obstetric Practice
        Committee opinion no. 529: placenta accreta.
        Obstet Gynecol. 2012; 120: 207-211
        • Eller A.G.
        • Bennett M.A.
        • Sharshiner M.
        • et al.
        Maternal morbidity in cases of placenta accreta managed by a multidisciplinary care team compared with standard obstetric care.
        Obstet Gynecol. 2011; 117: 331-337
        • Usta I.M.
        • Hobeika E.M.
        • Musa A.A.
        • Gabriel G.E.
        • Nassar A.H.
        Placenta previa-accreta: risk factors and complications.
        Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2005; 193: 1045-1049
        • Hull A.D.
        • Resnik R.
        Placenta accreta and postpartum hemorrhage.
        Clin Obstet Gynecol. 2010; 53: 228-236
        • Flood K.M.
        • Said S.
        • Geary M.
        • Robson M.
        • Fitzpatrick C.
        • Malone F.D.
        Changing trends in peripartum hysterectomy over the last 4 decades.
        Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2009; 200: 632.e1-632.e6
        • Warshak C.R.
        • Ramos G.A.
        • Eskander R.
        • et al.
        Effect of predelivery diagnosis in 99 consecutive cases of placenta accreta.
        Obstet Gynecol. 2010; 115: 65-69
        • Eller A.G.
        • Porter T.F.
        • Soisson P.
        • Silver R.M.
        Optimal management strategies for placenta accreta.
        BJOG. 2009; 116: 648-654
        • Walker M.G.
        • Allen L.
        • Windrim R.C.
        • et al.
        Multidisciplinary management of invasive placentaprevia.
        J Obstet Gynaecol Can. 2013; 35: 417-425
        • Parva M.
        • Chamchad D.
        • Keegan J.
        • Gerson A.
        • Horrow J.
        Placenta percreta with invasion of the bladder wall: management with a multi-disciplinary approach.
        J Clin Anesth. 2010; 22: 209-212
        • Robinson B.K.
        • Grobman W.A.
        Effectiveness of timing strategies for delivery of individuals with placenta previa and accreta.
        Obstet Gynecol. 2010; 116: 835-842
        • Angstmann T.
        • Gard G.
        • Harrington T.
        • Ward E.
        • Thomson A.
        • Giles W.
        Surgical management of placenta accreta: a cohort series and suggested approach.
        Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2010; 202: 38.e1-38.e9
        • Perel P.
        • Roberts I.
        • Ker K.
        Colloids versus crystalloids for fluid resuscitation in critically ill patients.
        Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2013; 2: CD000567
        • American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists
        Clinical management guidelines for obstetrician-gynecologists: postpartum hemorrhage. ACOG Practice Bulletin no. 76.
        Obstet Gynecol. 2006; 108: 1039-1047
        • D’Antonio F.
        • Iacovella C.
        • Bhide A.
        Prenatal identification of invasive placentation using ultrasound: systematic review and meta-analysis.
        Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2013; 42: 509-517
        • Comstock C.H.
        • Bronsteen R.A.
        The antenatal diagnosis of placenta accreta.
        BJOG. 2014; 121: 171-172
        • Primo L.F.
        • Arbogast K.
        • Digiacomo T.
        • Shepherd K.
        • Gardner M.O.
        • Doyle N.M.
        Placenta accreta: can we forecast its arrival?.
        Obstet Gynecol. 2014; 123: 166S
        • Belfort M.A.
        Indicated preterm birth for placenta accreta.
        Semin Perinatol. 2011; 35: 252-256
        • Ballas J.
        • Hull A.D.
        • Saenz C.
        • et al.
        Preoperative intravascular balloon catheters and surgical outcomes in pregnancies complicated by placenta accreta: a management paradox.
        Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2012; 207: 216.e1-216.e5
        • Stafford I.
        • Dildy G.A.
        • Clark S.L.
        • Belfort M.A.
        Visually estimated and calculated blood loss in vaginal and cesarean delivery.
        Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2008; 199: 519.e1-519.e7