Advertisement

A prospective comparison of postoperative pain and quality of life in robotic assisted vs conventional laparoscopic gynecologic surgery

Published:August 06, 2014DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajog.2014.08.003

      Objective

      We sought to compare robotic vs laparoscopic surgery in regards to patient reported postoperative pain and quality of life.

      Study Design

      This was a prospective study of patients who presented for treatment of a new gynecologic disease requiring minimally invasive surgical intervention. All subjects were asked to take the validated Brief Pain Inventory-Short Form at 3 time points to assess pain and its effect on quality of life. Statistical analyses were performed using Pearson x2 and Student’s t test.

      Results

      One hundred eleven were included in the analysis of which 56 patients underwent robotic assisted surgery and 55 patients underwent laparoscopic surgery. There was no difference in postoperative pain between conventional laparoscopy and robotic assisted surgery for gynecologic procedures. There was a statistically significant difference found at the delayed postoperative period when evaluating interference of sleep, favoring laparoscopy (ROB 2.0 vs LSC 1.0; P = .03). There were no differences found between the robotic and laparoscopic groups of patients receiving narcotics (56 vs 53, P = .24, respectively), route of administration of narcotics (47 vs 45, P > .99, respectively), or administration of nonsteroidal antiinflammatory medications (27 vs 21, P = .33, respectively).

      Conclusion

      Our results demonstrate no difference in postoperative pain between conventional laparoscopy and robotic assisted surgery for gynecologic procedures. Furthermore, pain did not appear to interfere consistently with any daily activity of living. Interference of sleep needs to be further evaluated after controlling for bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy.

      Key words

      To read this article in full you will need to make a payment

      Purchase one-time access:

      Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online access
      One-time access price info
      • For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
      • For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'

      Subscribe:

      Subscribe to American Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology
      Already a print subscriber? Claim online access
      Already an online subscriber? Sign in
      Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect

      References

        • Scandola M.
        • Grespan L.
        • Vicentini M.
        • Fiorini P.
        Robot-assisted laparoscopic hysterectomy vs traditional laparoscopic hysterectomy: five metaanalyses.
        J Minim Invas Gynec. 2011; 18: 705-715
        • Soto E.
        • Lo Y.
        • Friedman K.
        • et al.
        Total laparoscopic hysterectomy versus da Vinci robotic hysterectomy: is using the robot beneficial?.
        J Gynecol Oncol. 2011; 4: 253-259
        • Liu H.
        • Lu D.
        • Wang L.
        • Shi G.
        • Song H.
        • Clarke J.
        Robotic surgery for benign gynaecological disease.
        Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2012; 2: CD008978
        • Sarlos D.
        • Kots L.
        • Stevanovic N.
        • von Felten S.
        • Schär G.
        Robotic compared with conventional laparoscopic hysterectomy, a randomized control trial.
        Obstet Gynecol. 2012; 120: 604-611
        • Wright J.D.
        • Ananth C.V.
        • Lewin S.N.
        • et al.
        Robotically assisted vs laparoscopic hysterectomy among women with benign gynecological disease.
        JAMA. 2013; 309: 689-698
        • Visco A.G.
        • Advincula A.P.
        Robotic gynecologic surgery.
        Obstet Gynecol. 2008; 112: 1369-1384
        • Mendoza T.R.
        • Chen C.
        • Brugger A.
        • et al.
        The utility and validity of the modified Brief Pain Inventory in a multiple-dose postoperative analgesic trial.
        Clin J Pain. 2004; 20: 357-362
        • Soliman P.T.
        • Langley G.
        • Munsell M.F.
        • Vaniya H.A.
        • Frumovitz M.
        • Ramirez P.T.
        Analgesic and antiemetic requirements after minimally invasive surgery for early cervical cancer: a comparison between laparoscopy and robotic surgery.
        Ann Surg Oncol. 2013; 20: 1355-1359