Advertisement

Effectiveness of blinding: sham suprapubic incisions in a randomized trial of retropubic midurethral sling in women undergoing vaginal prolapse surgery

      Objective

      This planned secondary analysis of the Outcomes Following Vaginal Prolapse Repairs and Midurethral Sling trial assessed whether treatment knowledge differed between randomized groups at 12 months and whether treatment success was affected by treatment perception.

      Study Design

      Sham suprapubic tension-free vaginal tape (TVT) incisions were made in the Outcomes Following Vaginal Prolapse Repairs and Midurethral Sling trial participants randomized to no-TVT. Primary surgical outcomes and maintenance of blinding was assessed at 12 months. Knowledge of treatment assignment was compared between groups, and the relationship with treatment success rates was assessed.

      Results

      Prior to the 12 month postoperative visit, only 4% of treated participants (13 of 336) formally reported unmasking. At 12 months, 94% of the randomized participants (315 of 336) provided treatment knowledge data. Sixteen TVT participants (10%) reported treatment knowledge; most (n = 15, 94%) were correct; 17 of the sham participants (11%) reported treatment knowledge; half (n = 8, 47%) were correct. Similar proportions of unmasked participants who reported no treatment knowledge correctly guessed/perceived treatment assignment (sham, 46 [33%] vs TVT, 44 [33%]). We did not detect significant differences in treatment success rates based on perception within and across received treatment groups (perceived sham vs TVT overall [P = .76]). Of those receiving TVT, more participants perceiving TVT had treatment success compared with those who perceived sham (84% vs 74%; P = .29). Among sham participants, more participants perceiving sham had success compared with those who perceived receiving TVT (65% vs 56%; P = .42).

      Conclusion

      Sham surgical incisions effectively mask TVT randomization. These findings may help to inform future surgical trial designs.

      Key words

      To read this article in full you will need to make a payment

      Purchase one-time access:

      Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online access
      One-time access price info
      • For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
      • For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'

      Subscribe:

      Subscribe to American Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology
      Already a print subscriber? Claim online access
      Already an online subscriber? Sign in
      Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect

      References

        • Jarrell J.
        • Brant R.
        • Leung W.
        • Taenzer P.
        Women’s pain experience predicts future surgery for pain associated with endometriosis.
        J Obstet Gynaecol Can. 2007; 29: 988-991
        • Wei J.
        • Nygaard I.
        • Richter H.
        • et al.
        • Pelvic Floor Disorders Network
        Outcomes following vaginal prolapse repair and mid urethral sling (OPUS) trial—design and methods.
        Clin Trials. 2009; 6: 162-171
        • Wei J.T.
        • Nygaard I.
        • Richter H.E.
        • et al.
        A midurethral sling to reduce incontinence after vaginal prolapse repair.
        N Engl J Med. 2012; 366: 2358-2367
        • Freeman T.B.
        • Vawter D.E.
        • Leaverton P.E.
        • et al.
        Use of placebo surgery in controlled trials of a cellular-based therapy for Parkinson’s disease.
        N Engl J Med. 1999; 341: 988-992
        • Barber M.D.M.H.S.
        • Weidner A.C.
        • Sokol A.I.
        • et al.
        Foundation for Female Health Awareness Research Network. Single-incision mini-sling compared with tension-free vaginal tape for the treatment of stress urinary incontinence: a randomized controlled trial.
        Obstet Gynecol. 2012; 119: 328-337
        • Meschia M.
        • Pifarotti P.
        • Spennacchio M.
        • Buonaguidi A.
        • Gattei U.
        • Somigliana E.
        A randomized comparison of tension-free vaginal tape and endopelvic fascia plication in women with genital prolapse and occult stress urinary incontinence.
        Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2004; 190: 609-613
        • Pathak S.
        • Odumosu M.
        • Peja S.
        • McIntyre K.
        • Selo-Ojeme D.
        Consent for gynaecological procedure: what do women understand and remember?.
        Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2013; 287: 59-63
        • McFadden B.
        • Constantine M.
        • Hammil S.
        • et al.
        Patient recall 6 weeks after surgical consent for midurethral sling using mesh.
        Int Urogynecol J. 2013; 24: 2099-2104
        • Wolf B.R.
        • Buckwalter J.A.
        Randomized surgical trials and “sham” surgery: relevance to modern orthopaedics and minimally invasive surgery.
        Iowa Orthop J. 2006; 26: 107-111
        • Angelos P.
        Ethical issues of participant recruitment in surgical clinical trials.
        Ann Surg Oncol. 2013; 20: 3184-3187