Advertisement

Goal attainment after treatment in patients with symptomatic pelvic organ prolapse

      Objective

      The objectives of this study were to: (1) assess differences in goal attainment of self-described goals after treatment of symptomatic pelvic organ prolapse (POP) for women who chose surgery compared to women who chose pessary; and (2) compare patient global improvement between groups.

      Study Design

      Women who had symptomatic stage ≥II prolapse presenting for care of POP to the urogynecology clinic at the University of New Mexico were recruited. Patients listed up to 3 goals they had for their treatment. In addition, they completed the short forms of the Pelvic Floor Distress Inventory (PFDI-20), the POP/Urinary Incontinence Sexual Questionnaire, and the Body Image Scale. Goals listed by patients were then categorized into 10 categories. Each of the listed goals was categorized based on a consensus of 5 providers. At 3 months' follow-up patients listed if they had met their self-described goals on a scale of 0-10 and also answered the Patient Global Improvement Index (PGI-I).

      Results

      There were no significant differences between the 2 groups' baseline characteristics. Surgery patients ranked their goal attainment higher than pessary patients for all the 3 goals listed. Similarly, PGI-I scores were also higher in the surgical (2.4 ± 1.1) than the pessary (1.93 ± 0.8) treatment groups (P < .04). Patients in the surgery group also had better symptom improvement as measured by the PFDI-20 (P < .02).

      Conclusion

      Patients who chose surgery had better global improvement and met their goals better compared to patients who chose pessary.

      Key words

      To read this article in full you will need to make a payment

      Purchase one-time access:

      Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online access
      One-time access price info
      • For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
      • For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'

      Subscribe:

      Subscribe to American Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology
      Already a print subscriber? Claim online access
      Already an online subscriber? Sign in
      Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect

      References

        • Kiresuk T.
        • Sherman R.
        Goal attainment scaling: a general method for evaluating community mental health programs.
        Commun Ment Health J. 1968; 4: 443-453
        • Elkadry E.A.
        • Kenton K.S.
        • FitzGerald M.P.
        • Shott S.
        • Brubaker L.
        Patient-selected goals: a new perspective on surgical outcome.
        Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2003; 189: 1551-1558
        • Hullfish K.L.
        • Bovbjerg V.E.
        • Steers W.D.
        Patient-centered goals for pelvic floor dysfunction surgery: long-term follow-up.
        Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2004; 191: 201-205
        • Komesu Y.M.
        • Rogers R.G.
        • Rode M.A.
        • et al.
        Patient-selected goal attainment for pessary wearers: what is the clinical relevance?.
        Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2008; 198: 577.e1-577.e5
        • Bump R.C.
        • Mattiasson A.
        • Bø K.
        • et al.
        The standardization of terminology of female pelvic organ prolapse and pelvic floor dysfunction.
        Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1996; 175: 10-17
        • Barber M.D.
        • Kuchibhatla M.N.
        • Pieper C.F.
        • Bump R.C.
        Psychometric evaluation of 2 comprehensive condition-specific quality of life instruments for women with pelvic floor disorders.
        Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2001; 185: 1388-1395
        • Rogers R.G.
        • Coates K.W.
        • Kammerer-Doak D.
        • Khalsa S.
        • Qualls C.
        A short form of the pelvic organ prolapse/urinary incontinence sexual questionnaire (PISQ-12).
        Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct. 2003; 14: 164-168
        • Hopwood P.
        • Fletcher I.
        • Lee A.
        • Al Ghazal S.
        A body image scale for use with cancer patients.
        Eur J Cancer. 2001; 37: 189-197
        • Srikrishna S.
        • Robinson D.
        • Cardozo L.
        Validation of the patient global impression of improvement (PGI-I) for urogenital prolapse.
        Int Urogynecol J. 2010; 21: 523-528
        • Srikrishna S.
        • Robinson D.
        • Cardozo L.
        • Cartwright R.
        Experiences and expectations of women with urogenital prolapse: a quantitative and qualitative exploration.
        BJOG. 2008; 115: 1362-1368
        • Adams S.R.
        • Dramitinos P.
        • Shapiro A.
        • Dodge L.
        • Elkadry E.
        Do patient goals vary with stage of prolapse?.
        Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2011; 205: 502.e1-502.e6
        • Srikrishna S.
        • Robinson D.
        • Cardozo L.
        A longitudinal study of patient and surgeon goal achievement 2 years after surgery following pelvic floor dysfunction surgery.
        BJOG. 2010; 117: 1504-1511
        • Hullfish K.L.
        • Bovbjerg V.E.
        • Gurka M.J.
        • Steers W.D.
        Surgical versus nonsurgical treatment of women with pelvic floor dysfunction: patient centered goals at 1 year.
        J Urol. 2008; 179: 2280-2285
        • Lowenstein L.
        • Kenton K.
        • Pierce K.
        • Fitzgerald M.P.
        • Mueller E.R.
        • Brubaker L.
        Patients' pelvic goals change after initial urogynecologic consultation.
        Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2007; 197: 640.e1-640.e3
        • Lowenstein L.
        • FitzGerald M.P.
        • Kenton K.
        • et al.
        Patient-selected goals: the fourth dimension in assessment of pelvic floor disorders.
        Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct. 2008; 19: 81-84
        • Srikrishna S.
        • Robinson D.
        • Cardozo L.
        Role of composite endpoints as an outcome assessment tool in urogenital prolapse.
        J Obstet Gynaecol. 2012; 32: 276-279