Advertisement

More research, more responsibility: the expansion of duty to warn in cancer patients considering fertility preservation

  • Gwendolyn P. Quinn
    Correspondence
    Reprints: Gwendolyn P. Quinn, PhD, MS, University of South Florida-Moffitt Cancer Center, Oncologic Science, 12902 Magnolia Dr., MRC CANCONT, Tampa, FL 33612
    Affiliations
    Department of Health Outcomes and Behavior, Moffitt Cancer Center, and Department of Oncologic Science, College of Medicine, Department of Oncologic Sciences, University of South Florida, Tampa, FL
    Search for articles by this author
  • Susan T. Vadaparampil
    Affiliations
    Department of Health Outcomes and Behavior, Moffitt Cancer Center, and Department of Oncologic Science, College of Medicine, Department of Oncologic Sciences, University of South Florida, Tampa, FL
    Search for articles by this author
Published:February 25, 2013DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajog.2013.02.031
      Reproductive technology is advancing at a steadfast pace. Researchers are successfully refining options for fertility preservation, to the benefit of the cancer community. Research has consistently shown cancer patients and survivors desire to have risks to fertility and preservation options disclosed, and major campaigns have been undertaken to refer these patients to fertility specialists. However, the decision to pursue fertility preservation is not an isolated judgment. A variety of future decisions may arise for the individual or couple, choices that may not have been relayed during the initial decision-making process. Future decisions include the length of time to continue to store frozen gametes, donating banked gametes to infertile couples, and whether embryos created with one partner would be accepted by a new partner. It is important to continue the advancement of fertility preservation not only in the scientific milieu, but also in addressing a patient's preparedness for long-term decision making.

      Key words

      To read this article in full you will need to make a payment

      Purchase one-time access:

      Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online access
      One-time access price info
      • For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
      • For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'

      Subscribe:

      Subscribe to American Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology
      Already a print subscriber? Claim online access
      Already an online subscriber? Sign in
      Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect

      References

        • Schover L.R.
        • Brey K.
        • Lichtin A.
        • Lipshultz L.I.
        • Jeha S.
        Knowledge and experience regarding cancer, infertility, and sperm banking in younger male survivors.
        J Clin Oncol. 2002; 20: 1880-1889
        • Schover L.R.
        • Rybicki L.A.
        • Martin B.A.
        • Bringelsen K.A.
        Having children after cancer: a pilot survey of survivors' attitudes and experiences.
        Cancer. 1999; 86: 697-709
        • Zebrack B.J.
        • Casillas J.
        • Nohr L.
        • Adams H.
        • Zeltzer L.K.
        Fertility issues for young adult survivors of childhood cancer.
        Psychooncology. 2004; 13: 689-699
        • Ethics Committee of the American Society for Reproductive Medicine
        Fertility preservation and reproduction in cancer patients.
        Fertil Steril. 2005; 83: 1622-1628
        • Chung K.
        • Irani J.
        • Knee G.
        • Efymow B.
        • Blasco L.
        • Patrizio P.
        Sperm cryopreservation for male patients with cancer: an epidemiological analysis at the University of Pennsylvania.
        Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2004; 113: S7-S11
        • Schoysman R.
        • Vanderzwalmen P.
        • Nijs M.
        • et al.
        Pregnancy obtained with human testicular spermatozoa in an in vitro fertilization program.
        J Androl. 1994; 15: 10-13S
        • Kubo H.
        • Shipley W.U.
        Reduction of the scatter dose to the testicle outside the radiation treatment fields.
        Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 1982; 8: 1741-1745
        • Brook P.F.
        • Radford J.A.
        • Shalet S.M.
        • Joyce A.D.
        • Gosden R.G.
        Isolation of germ cells from human testicular tissue for low temperature storage and autotransplantation.
        Fertil Steril. 2001; 75: 269-274
        • Schlatt S.
        • Honaramooz A.
        • Ehmcke J.
        • et al.
        Limited survival of adult human testicular tissue as ectopic xenograft.
        Hum Reprod. 2006; 21: 384-389
        • Meistrich M.L.
        • Shetty G.
        Focus on fertility preservation: hormonal suppression for fertility preservation in males and females.
        Reproduction. 2008; 136: 691-701
        • Covens A.L.
        • van der Putten H.W.
        • Fyles A.W.
        • et al.
        Laparoscopic ovarian transposition.
        Eur J Gynaecol Oncol. 1996; 17: 177-182
        • Blumenfeld Z.
        GnRH-agonists in fertility preservation.
        Curr Opin Endocrinol Diabetes Obes. 2008; 15: 523-528
        • Oktay K.
        • Cil A.P.
        • Bang H.
        Efficiency of oocyte cryopreservation: a meta-analysis.
        Fertil Steril. 2006; 86: 70-80
        • Practice Committees of the American Society for Reproductive Medicine and the Society for Assisted Reproductive Technology
        Mature oocyte cryopreservation: a guideline.
        Fertil Steril. 2013; 99: 37-43
        • Lee S.J.
        • Schover L.R.
        • Partridge A.H.
        • et al.
        ASCO recommendations on fertility preservation in people treated for cancer.
        J Clin Oncol. 2006; 24: 2917-2931
        • Quinn G.P.
        • Vadaparampil S.T.
        • Lee J.H.
        • et al.
        Physician referral for fertility preservation in oncology patients: a national study of practice behaviors.
        J Clin Oncol. 2009; 27: 5952-5957
        • Reebals J.F.
        • Brown R.
        • Buckner E.B.
        Nurse practice issues regarding sperm banking in adolescent male cancer patients.
        J Pediatr Oncol Nurs. 2006; 23: 182-188
        • Vadaparampil S.
        • Quinn G.
        • King L.
        • Wilson C.
        • Nieder M.
        Barriers to fertility preservation among pediatric oncologists.
        Patient Educ Couns. 2008; 72: 402-410
        • Surbone A.
        • Petrek J.A.
        Childbearing issues in breast carcinoma survivors.
        Cancer. 1997; 79: 1271-1278
        • Dow K.H.
        Having children after breast cancer.
        Cancer Pract. 1994; 2: 407-413
        • Quinn G.P.
        • Vadaparampil S.T.
        • Jacobsen P.B.
        • Knapp C.
        • Keefe D.L.
        • Bell G.E.
        • Moffitt Fertility Preservation Group
        Frozen hope: fertility preservation for women with cancer.
        J Midwifery Womens Health. 2010; 55: 175-180
        • Nachtigall R.D.
        • Becker G.
        • Friese C.
        • Butler A.
        • MacDougall K.
        Parents' conceptualization of their frozen embryos complicates the disposition decision.
        Fertil Steril. 2005; 84: 431-434
        • Klock S.C.
        • Sheinin S.
        • Kazer R.
        Couples' attitudes regarding embryo disposition after in vitro fertilization (IVF).
        Fertil Steril. 2001; 76: 11A
        • Partridge A.H.
        • Gelber S.
        • Peppercorn J.
        • et al.
        Web-based survey of fertility issues in young women with breast cancer.
        J Clin Oncol. 2004; 22: 4174-4183
        • Bunting L.
        • Boivin J.
        Decision-making about seeking medical advice in an Internet sample of women trying to get pregnant.
        Hum Reprod. 2007; 22: 1662-1668
        • Lee S.H.
        • Wang S.C.
        • Kuo C.P.
        • Kuo C.P.
        • Lee M.S.
        • Lee M.C.
        Grief responses and coping strategies among infertile women after failed in vitro fertilization treatment.
        Scand J Caring Sci. 2010; 24: 507-513
        • Greil A.L.
        • McQuillan J.
        Help-seeking patterns among sub-fecund women.
        J Reprod Infant Psychol. 2004; 22: 305-319
        • National Commission for the Protection of Human Subjects of Biomedical and Behavioral Research
        The Belmont report.
        US Government Printing Office, Washington, DC1979
      1. Schneider CE. (2011) The failure of mandated disclosure, 159 U PA L REV 647, 670.

      2. Salgo v Leland Stanford Jr Univ Bd of Trs, 317 P2d 170, 181 (Cal Ct App 1957).

      3. Harnish v Children's Hospital Medical Center 387 Mass 152, 439 NE2d 240, 1982 Mass.

        • Society for Reproductive Endocrinology and Infertility
        Many doctors provide infertility care.
        2009 (Accessed Dec. 21, 2012)
        • Quinn G.P.
        • Vadaparampil S.T.
        • Gwede C.K.
        • et al.
        Discussion of fertility preservation with newly diagnosed patients: oncologists' views.
        J Cancer Surviv. 2007; 1: 146-155
        • Gwede C.K.
        • Vadaparampil S.T.
        • Hoffe S.
        • Quinn G.P.
        The role of radiation oncologists and discussion of fertility preservation in young cancer patients.
        Pract Radiat Oncol. 2012; 2: 242-247
        • Thewes B.
        • Meiser B.
        • Taylor A.
        • et al.
        Fertility and menopause-related information needs of younger women with a diagnosis of early breast cancer.
        J Clin Oncol. 2005; 23: 5155-5165
        • Wilkes S.
        • Coulson S.
        • Crosland A.
        • Rubin G.
        • Stewart J.
        Experience of fertility preservation among younger people diagnosed with cancer.
        Hum Fertil. 2010; 13: 151-158
        • Dugan R.B.
        • Wiesner G.L.
        • Juengst E.T.
        • O'Riordan M.
        • Matthews A.L.
        • Robin N.H.
        Duty to warn at-risk relatives for genetic disease: genetic counselors' clinical experience.
        Am J Med Genet C Semin Med Genet. 2003; 119C: 27-34