Advertisement

Obstetrician-gynecologists, religious institutions, and conflicts regarding patient-care policies

Published:April 30, 2012DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajog.2012.04.023

      Objective

      The purpose of this study was to assess how common it is for obstetrician-gynecologists who work in religiously affiliated hospitals or practices to experience conflict with those institutions over religiously based policies for patient care and to identify the proportion of obstetrician-gynecologists who report that their hospitals restrict their options for the treatment of ectopic pregnancy.

      Study Design

      We mailed a survey to a nationally representative sample of 1800 practicing obstetrician-gynecologists.

      Results

      The response rate was 66%. Among obstetrician-gynecologists who practice in religiously affiliated institutions, 37% have had a conflict with their institution over religiously based policies. These conflicts are most common in Catholic institutions (52%; adjusted odds ratio, 8.7; 95% confidence interval, 1.7–46.2). Few reported that their options for treating ectopic pregnancy are limited by their hospitals (2.5% at non-Catholic institutions vs 5.5% at Catholic institutions; P = .07).

      Conclusion

      Many obstetrician-gynecologists who practice in religiously affiliated institutions have had conflicts over religiously based policies. The effects of these conflicts on patient care and outcomes are an important area for future research.

      Key words

      To read this article in full you will need to make a payment

      Purchase one-time access:

      Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online access
      One-time access price info
      • For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
      • For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'

      Subscribe:

      Subscribe to American Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology
      Already a print subscriber? Claim online access
      Already an online subscriber? Sign in
      Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect

      References

        • Uttley L.
        • Pawelko R.
        No strings attached: public funding of religiously-sponsored hospitals in the United States.
        MergerWatch, Albany, NY2002 (Accessed Jan. 23, 2012)
        • Catholic Health Association of the United States
        Fast facts, 2011.
        (Accessed Jan. 23, 2012)
      1. Modern Healthcare's 2011 Hospital System Survey.
        (Accessed Jan. 12, 2012)
        • Stein R.
        Reproductive care restrictions at Catholic hospitals spark conflict, scrutiny.
        in: Washington Post, Jan 20, 2011: A01
        • Stulberg D.B.
        • Lawrence R.E.
        • Shattuck J.
        • Curlin F.A.
        Religious hospitals and primary care physicians: Conflict over policies for patient care.
        J Gen Intern Med. 2010; 25: 725-730
        • Freedman L.R.
        • Landy U.
        • Steinauer J.
        When there's a heartbeat: miscarriage management in Catholic-owned hospitals.
        Am J Public Health. 2008; 98: 1774-1778
        • United States Conference of Catholic Bishops
        Ethical and religious directives for Catholic Health Care Services. 5th ed. 2009 (Accessed Jan. 23, 2012)
        • Kelly D.F.
        Contemporary Catholic health care ethics.
        Georgetown University Press, Washington, DC2004
        • Pivarunas A.R.
        Ethical and medical considerations in the treatment of ectopic pregnancy.
        Linacre Q. 2003; 70: 195-209
        • Kaczor C.
        The ethics of ectopic pregnancy: a critical reconsideration of salpingostomy and methotrexate.
        Linacre Q. 2009; 76: 265-282
        • American College of Obstetricians and, Gynecologists
        ACOG practice bulletin no. 94: medical management of ectopic pregnancy.
        Obstet Gynecol. 2008; 111: 1479-1485
        • Foster A.M.
        • Dennis A.
        • Smith F.
        Do religious restrictions influence ectopic pregnancy management?.
        Womens Health Issues. 2011; 21: 104-109
        • Lawrence R.E.
        • Rasinski K.A.
        • Yoon J.D.
        • Curlin F.A.
        Obstetrician-gynecologists' beliefs about assisted reproductive technologies.
        Obstet Gynecol. 2010; 116: 127-135
        • Lauderdale D.S.
        • Kestenbaum B.
        Asian American ethnic identification by surname.
        Popu Res Policy Rev. 2000; 19: 283-300
        • Lauderdale D.S.
        Birth outcomes for Arabic-named women in California before and after September 11.
        Demography. 2006; 43: 185-201
        • Sheskin I.M.
        A methodology for examining the changing size and spatial distribution of a Jewish population: a Miami case study.
        Shofar. 1998; 17: 97-116
        • Yoon J.D.
        • Rasinski K.A.
        • Curlin F.A.
        Conflict and emotional exhaustion in obstetrician-gynaecologists: a national survey.
        J Med Ethics. 2010; 36: 731-735
        • Uttley L.J.
        How merging religious and secular hospitals can threaten health care services.
        Soc Policy. 2000; 30: 4-13
        • Gallagher J.
        Religious freedom, reproductive health care, and hospital mergers.
        J Am Med Womens Assoc. 1997; 52: 65-68