Purchase one-time access:Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online access
One-time access price info
- For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
- For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'
Subscribe:Subscribe to American Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology
- US women's perceptions of and attitudes about the IUD.Obstet Gynecol Surv. 1996; 51: S30-S34
- Young pregnant women's knowledge of modern intrauterine devices.Obstet Gynecol. 2006; 108: 1417-1422
- Strategies for communicating contraceptive effectiveness.Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2008; : CD006964
- Women's knowledge about intrauterine contraception.Obstet Gynecol. 2011; 117: 48-54
- Public knowledge and perceptions about unplanned pregnancy and contraception in three countries.Fam Plann Perspect. 1997; 29: 70-75
- Trends in contraceptive knowledge and use among adolescent married women in Malawi.Croat Med J. 2008; 49: 561-563
- Use of contraception in the United States: 1982-2008: National Center for Health Statistics.Vital Health Stat. 2010; 29: 1-44
- Disparities in rates of unintended pregnancy in the United States, 1994 and 2001.Perspect Sex Reprod Health. 2006; 38: 90-96
- Characteristics of women in the United States who use long-acting reversible contraceptive methods.Obstet Gynecol. 2011; 117: 1349-1357
- Continuation and satisfaction of reversible contraception.Obstet Gynecol. 2011; 117: 1105-1113
- The Contraceptive CHOICE Project: reducing barriers to long-acting reversible contraception.Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2010; 203: 115.e1-115.e7
- Contraceptive failure in the United States.Contraception. 2011; 83: 397-404
- Unintended pregnancy and abortion in the USA: epidemiology and public health impact.in: Paul M. Lichtenberg E.S. Borgatta L. Grimes D.A. Stubblefield P.G. Creinin M.D. Management of unintended and abnormal pregnancy: comprehensive abortion care. Wiley-Blackwell, Oxford2009: 24-35 (Chapter 3)
- Counseling in the clinical setting to prevent unintended pregnancy: an evidence-based research agenda.Contraception. 2003; 67: 115-132
- Hormonal contraceptive method choice among young, low-income women: how important is the provider?.Patient Educ Couns. 2010; 81: 349-354
- The impact of contraceptive counseling in primary care on contraceptive use.J Gen Intern Med. 2011; 26: 731-736
- Pharmaceutical industry marketing: understanding its impact on women's health.Obstet Gynecol Surv. 2008; 63: 585-596
- Communicating contraceptive effectiveness: a randomized controlled trial to inform a World Health Organization family planning handbook.Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2006; 195: 85-91
- Communicating contraceptive effectiveness: an updated counseling chart.Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2007; 197: 118
Kittur ND, Secura GM, Peipert JF, Madden T, Finer LB, Allsworth JE. Comparison of contraceptive use between the Contraceptive CHOICE Project and state and national data. Contraception; 83:479-85.
- Fulfilling the promise: public policy and US family planning clinics.The Alan Guttmacher Institute (AGI), The Alan Guttmacher Institute New York2000
- ACOG committee opinion no. 450: increasing use of contraceptive implants and intrauterine devices to reduce unintended pregnancy.Obstet Gynecol. 2009; 114: 1434-1438
The Contraceptive Choice Project is funded by an anonymous foundation.
The authors report no conflict of interest.
Cite this article as: Eisenberg DL, Secura GM, Madden TE, et al. Knowledge of contraceptive effectiveness. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2012;206:479.e1-9.