Advertisement

Fetal male gender and the benefits of treatment of mild gestational diabetes mellitus

Published:March 26, 2012DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajog.2012.03.015

      Objective

      We evaluated whether improvements in pregnancy outcomes after treatment of mild gestational diabetes mellitus differed in magnitude on the basis of fetal gender.

      Study Design

      This is a secondary analysis of a masked randomized controlled trial of treatment for mild gestational diabetes mellitus. The results included preeclampsia or gestational hypertension, birthweight, neonatal fat mass, and composite adverse outcomes for both neonate (preterm birth, small for gestational age, or neonatal intensive care unit admission) and mother (labor induction, cesarean delivery, preeclampsia, or gestational hypertension). After stratification according to fetal gender, the interaction of gender with treatment status was estimated for these outcomes.

      Results

      Of the 469 pregnancies with male fetuses, 244 pregnancies were assigned randomly to treatment, and 225 pregnancies were assigned randomly to routine care. Of the 463 pregnancies with female fetuses, 233 pregnancies were assigned randomly to treatment, and 230 pregnancies were assigned randomly to routine care. The interaction of gender with treatment status was significant for fat mass (P = .04) and birthweight percentile (P = .02). Among women who were assigned to the treatment group, male offspring were significantly more likely to have both a lower birthweight percentile (50.7 ± 29.2 vs 62.5 ± 30.2 percentile; P < .0001) and less neonatal fat mass (487 ± 229.6 g vs 416.6 ± 172.8 g; P = .0005,) whereas these differences were not significant among female offspring. There was no interaction between fetal gender and treatment group with regard to other outcomes.

      Conclusion

      The magnitude of the reduction of a newborn's birthweight percentile and neonatal fat mass that were related to the treatment of mild gestational diabetes mellitus appears greater for male neonates.

      Key words

      To read this article in full you will need to make a payment

      Purchase one-time access:

      Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online access
      One-time access price info
      • For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
      • For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'

      Subscribe:

      Subscribe to American Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology
      Already a print subscriber? Claim online access
      Already an online subscriber? Sign in
      Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect

      References

        • Crowther C.A.
        • Hiller J.E.
        • Moss J.R.
        • et al.
        Effect of treatment of gestational diabetes mellitus on pregnancy outcomes.
        N Engl J Med. 2005; 352: 2477-2486
        • Landon M.B.
        • Spong C.Y.
        • Thom E.
        • et al.
        A multicenter, randomized trial of treatment for mild gestational diabetes.
        N Engl J Med. 2009; 361: 1339-1348
        • Biri A.
        • Onan A.
        • Devrim E.
        • Babacan F.
        • Kavutu M.
        • Durak I.
        Oxidant status in maternal and cord plasma and placental tissue in gestational diabetes.
        Placenta. 2006; 27: 327-332
        • Sekiya M.
        • Hiraishi A.
        • Touyama M.
        • Sakamoto K.
        Oxidative stress induced lipid accumulation via SREBP1c activation in HepG2 cells.
        Biochem Biophys Res Comm. 2008; 375: 602-607
        • Brandes R.F.
        • Mugge A.
        Gender differences in generation of superoxide anions in the rat aorta.
        Life Sci. 1997; 60: 391-396
        • Malorni W.
        • Straface E.
        • Matcerrese P.
        • et al.
        Redox state and gender differences in vascular smooth muscle cells.
        FEBS Lett. 2008; 582: 635-642
        • Metzger B.E.
        • Coustan D.R.
        Summary and recommendation of the fourth International Workshop–Conference on gestational diabetes mellitus.
        Diabetes Care. 1998; 21: B161-B167
        • American Diabetes Association
        Nutrition recommendations and intervention for diet: a position statement of the American Diabetes Association.
        Diabetes Care. 2008; 31: S61-S78
        • Corvett R.M.
        Hypoglycemia and hyperglycemia in the newborn.
        in: Polin R.A. Fox W.W. Fetal and neonatal physiology. Saunders, Philadelphia1992: 406
        • Gardosi J.
        • Francis A.
        A customized standard to assess fetal growth in US population.
        Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2009; 201: 25.e1-25.e7
        • Catalano P.M.
        • Thomas A.F.
        • Avallone D.A.
        • Amini S.M.
        Anthropomorphic estimation of body composition.
        Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1995; 173: 1176-1181
        • Silverman B.L.
        • Metzger B.E.
        • Cho N.H.
        • Loeb C.A.
        Impaired glucose tolerance in adolescent offspring of diabetic mothers: relationship to fetal hyperinsulinism.
        Diabetes Care. 1995; 18: 611-617
        • Suzuki T.
        • Bramlett H.M.
        • Dietrich W.D.
        The importance of gender on the beneficial effects of post-traumatic hypothermia.
        Exp Neurol. 2003; 184: 1017-1026
        • Hillier T.A.
        • Pedula K.L.
        • Schmidt M.M.
        • Mullen J.A.
        • Charles M.A.
        • Pettitt D.J.
        Childhood obesity and metabolic imprinting: the ongoing effects of maternal hyperglycemia.
        Diabetes Care. 2007; 30: 2287-2292