Postpartum intrauterine device insertion and postpartum tubal sterilization in the United States

Published:August 12, 2011DOI:


      The purpose of this study was to estimate US rates of postpartum intrauterine device (IUD) insertion and postpartum tubal sterilization.

      Study Design

      Data from the 2001-2008 Nationwide Inpatient Sample were used to identify delivery hospitalizations with IUD insertion or tubal sterilization procedure codes.


      Estimated rates of postpartum IUD insertion and postpartum tubal sterilization were 0.27 and 770.67 per 10,000 deliveries, respectively. Although the rate of IUD insertion was similar across age groups, the rate of tubal sterilization increased with age. Nonetheless, 15% of tubal sterilizations occurred among women who were ≤24 years old. IUD insertion was more likely among women who delivered at teaching hospitals (odds ratio, 3.02; 95% confidence interval, 1.43–6.37); tubal sterilization was more likely among women without private insurance (odds ratio, 2.04; 95% confidence interval, 1.97–2.11).


      Among US postpartum women, IUD insertion occurs considerably less frequently than tubal sterilization, even among younger women for whom poststerilization regret is a concern.

      Key words

      To read this article in full you will need to make a payment

      Purchase one-time access:

      Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online access
      One-time access price info
      • For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
      • For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'


      Subscribe to American Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology
      Already a print subscriber? Claim online access
      Already an online subscriber? Sign in
      Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect


      1. Contraceptive use among postpartum women: 12 states and New York City, 2004-2006.
        MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2009; 58: 821-826
        • Centers for Disease Control and Prevention
        US medical eligibility criteria for contraceptive use, 2010: adapted from the World Health Organization medical eligibility criteria for contraceptive use, 4th ed.
        MMWR Recomm Rep. 2010; 59: 1-86
        • Trussell J.
        Contraceptive failure in the United States.
        Contraception. 2011; 83: 397-404
        • Kapp N.
        • Curtis K.M.
        Intrauterine device insertion during the postpartum period: a systematic review.
        Contraception. 2009; 80: 327-336
        • Chen B.A.
        • Reeves M.F.
        • Hayes J.L.
        • Hohmann H.L.
        • Perriera L.K.
        • Creinin M.D.
        Postplacental or delayed insertion of the levonorgestrel intrauterine device after vaginal delivery: a randomized controlled trial.
        Obstet Gynecol. 2010; 116: 1079-1087
        • Grimes D.A.
        • Lopez L.M.
        • Schulz K.F.
        • Van Vliet H.A.
        • Stanwood N.L.
        Immediate post-partum insertion of intrauterine devices.
        Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2010; 5
        • Mosher W.D.
        • Jones J.
        Use of contraception in the United States: 1982-2008.
        Vital Health Stat. 2010; 29 (23): 1-44
        • MacKay A.P.
        • Kieke Jr, B.A.
        • Koonin L.M.
        • Beattie K.
        Tubal sterilization in the United States, 1994-1996.
        Fam Plann Perspect. 2001; 33: 161-165
        • Chan L.M.
        • Westhoff C.L.
        Tubal sterilization trends in the United States.
        Fertil Steril. 2010; 94: 1-6
        • HCUP Nationwide Inpatient Sample (NIS)
        Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project (HCUP).
        Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality, Rockville, MD2001-2008 (Accessed July 28, 2010)
      2. American Hospital Association (AHA) Hospital Statistics.
        in: Health Forum LLC, an affiliate of the American Hospital Association, Chicago, IL1995: 6-2001
        • American College of Obstetrics and Gynecology
        Practice bulletin no. 121: long-acting reversible contraception: implants and intrauterine devices.
        Obstet Gynecol. 2011; 118: 184-196
        • Placek P.J.
        • Taffel S.M.
        • Smith J.C.
        • Maze J.M.
        Postpartum sterilization in cesarean section and non-cesarean section deliveries: United States, 1970-75.
        Am J Public Health. 1981; 71: 1258-1261
        • Hillis S.D.
        • Marchbanks P.A.
        • Tylor L.R.
        • Peterson H.B.
        Poststerilization regret: findings from the United States Collaborative Review of Sterilization.
        Obstet Gynecol. 1999; 93: 889-895
        • Curtis K.M.
        • Mohllajee A.P.
        • Peterson H.B.
        Regret following female sterilization at a young age: a systematic review.
        Contraception. 2006; 73: 205-210
        • Ogburn J.A.
        • Espey E.
        • Stonehocker J.
        Barriers to intrauterine device insertion in postpartum women.
        Contraception. 2005; 72: 426-429
        • Zite N.
        • Wuellner S.
        • Gilliam M.
        Failure to obtain desired postpartum sterilization: risk and predictors.
        Obstet Gynecol. 2005; 105: 794-799
        • Borrero S.
        • Schwarz E.B.
        • Reeves M.F.
        • Bost J.E.
        • Creinin M.D.
        • Ibrahim S.A.
        Race, insurance status, and tubal sterilization.
        Obstet Gynecol. 2007; 109: 94-100
        • The Alan Guttmacher Institute
        State Medicaid family planning eligibility expansions.
        Sept. 1, 2010
        • Yasmeen S.
        • Romano P.S.
        • Schembri M.E.
        • Keyzer J.M.
        • Gilbert W.M.
        Accuracy of obstetric diagnoses and procedures in hospital discharge data.
        Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2006; 194: 992-1001
        • Trussell J.
        • Lalla A.M.
        • Doan Q.V.
        • Reyes E.
        • Pinto L.
        • Gricar J.
        Cost effectiveness of contraceptives in the United States.
        Contraception. 2009; 79: 5-14
        • Harper C.C.
        • Blum M.
        • de Bocanegra H.T.
        • et al.
        Challenges in translating evidence to practice: the provision of intrauterine contraception.
        Obstet Gynecol. 2008; 111 (1359-6)