Preventing Low Birthweight: 25 years, prenatal risk, and the failure to reinvent prenatal care

      In 2010, Preventing Low Birthweight celebrated it 25th anniversary. The report, one of the most influential policy statements ever issued regarding obstetric health care delivery, linked prenatal care to a reduction in low birthweight (LBW). Medicaid coverage for prenatal care services was subsequently expanded and resulted in increased prenatal care utilization. However, the rate of LBW failed to decrease. This well-intentioned expansion of prenatal care services did not change the structure of prenatal care. A single, standardized prenatal care model, largely ineffective in the prevention of LBW, was expanded to a heterogeneous group of patients with a variety of medical and psychosocial risk factors. Reinventing prenatal care as a flexible model, with content, frequency, and timing tailored to maternal and fetal risk, may improve adverse birth outcomes. Risk-appropriate prenatal care may improve the effectiveness of prenatal care for high-risk patients and the efficiency of prenatal care delivery for low-risk patients.

      Key words

      To read this article in full you will need to make a payment

      Purchase one-time access:

      Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online access
      One-time access price info
      • For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
      • For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'


      Subscribe to American Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology
      Already a print subscriber? Claim online access
      Already an online subscriber? Sign in
      Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect


        • Institute of Medicine
        Preventing low birthweight.
        National Academy Press, Washington, DC1985
        • McCormick M.C.
        The contribution of low birth weight to infant mortality and childhood morbidity.
        N Engl J Med. 1985; 312: 82-90
        • Russell R.B.
        • Green N.S.
        • Steiner C.A.
        • et al.
        Cost of hospitalization for preterm and low birth weight infants in the United States.
        Pediatrics. 2007; 120: e1-e9
        • Piper J.M.
        • Ray W.A.
        • Griffin M.R.
        Effects of Medicaid eligibility expansion on prenatal care and pregnancy outcome in Tennessee.
        JAMA. 1990; 264: 2219-2223
        • Institute of Medicine
        Prenatal care: reaching mother, reaching infants.
        National Academy Press, Washington, DC1988
        • Centers for Disease Control and Prevention
        Infant mortality and low birth weight among black and white infants–United States, 1980-2000.
        MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2002; 51: 589-592
        • Hamilton B.E.
        • Martin J.A.
        • Ventura S.J.
        Births: preliminary data for 2008.
        Natl Vital Stat Rep. 2010; 58: 1-18
        • Oberg C.N.
        • Polich C.L.
        Medicaid: entering the third decade.
        Health Affairs. 1988; 7: 83-96
        • Schlobohm A.
        Appendix 1: Medicaid legislative history, 1965-2000.
        in: Schneider A. The Medicaid resource book. The Kaiser Commission on Medicaid and the Uninsured, Washingon, DC2002
        • Anum E.A.
        • Retchin S.M.
        • Strauss J.F.
        Medicaid and preterm birth and low birth weight: the last two decades.
        J Womens Health. 2010; 19: 443-451
        • Martin J.A.
        • Hamilton B.E.
        • Sutton P.D.
        • et al.
        Births: final data for 2007.
        Natl Vital Stat Rep. 2010; 58: 106
        • Lewis C.T.
        • Mathews T.J.
        • Heuser R.L.
        Prenatal care in the United States, 1980-94.
        Vital Health Stat. 1996; 21: 1-19
        • Herron M.A.
        • Katz M.
        • Creasy R.K.
        Evaluation of a preterm birth prevention program: preliminary report.
        Obstet Gynecol. 1982; 59: 452-456
        • Quick J.D.
        • Greenlick M.R.
        • Roghmann K.J.
        Prenatal care and pregnancy outcome in an HMO and general population: a multivariate cohort analysis.
        Am J Public Health. 1981; 71: 381-390
        • Ershoff D.H.
        • Aaronson N.K.
        • Danaher B.G.
        • Wasserman F.W.
        Behavioral, health and cost outcomes of an HMO-based prenatal health education program.
        Public Health Rep. 1983; 98: 536-547
        • Dubay L.
        • Joyce T.
        • Kaestner R.
        • Kenney G.M.
        Changes in prenatal care timing and low birth weight by race and socioeconomic status: implications for the Medicaid expansions for pregnant women.
        Health Serv Res. 2001; 36: 373-398
        • Fiscella K.
        Does prenatal care improve birth outcomes?.
        Obstet Gynecol. 1995; 85: 468-479
        • Lu M.C.
        • Tache V.
        • Alexander G.R.
        • Kotelchuck M.
        • Halfon N.
        Preventing low birth weight: is prenatal care the answer?.
        J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2003; 13: 362-380
        • Alexander G.R.
        • Kotelchuck M.
        Assessing the role and effectiveness of prenatal care: history, challenges and directions for future research.
        Public Health Rep. 2001; 116: 306-316
        • Alexander G.R.
        • Korenbrot C.C.
        The role of prenatal care in preventing low birth weight.
        Future Child. 1995; 5: 103-120
        • Alexander G.R.
        • Howell E.
        Preventing preterm birth and increasing access to prenatal care: two important but distinct national goals.
        Am J Prev Med. 1997; 13: 290-291
        • Huntington J.
        • Connell F.A.
        For every dollar spent–the cost-savings argument for prenatal care.
        N Engl J Med. 1994; 331: 1303-1307
        • Borders A.E.
        • Grobman W.A.
        • Amsden L.B.
        • Holl J.L.
        Chronic stress and low birth weight neonates in a low-income population of women.
        Obstet Gynecol. 2007; 109: 331-338
        • US Public Health Service
        Caring for our future: the content of prenatal care.
        Department of Health and Human Services, Washington, DC1989
        • Kogan M.D.
        • Martin J.A.
        • Alexander G.R.
        • Kotelchuck M.
        • Ventura S.J.
        • Frigoletto F.D.
        The changing pattern of prenatal care utilization in the United States, 1981-1995, using different prenatal care indices.
        JAMA. 1998; 279: 1623-1628
        • Lauderdale D.S.
        • VanderWeele T.J.
        • Siddique J.
        • Lantos J.D.
        Prenatal care utilization in excess of recommended levels: trends from 1985-2004.
        Med Care Res Rev. 2010; 67: 609-622
        • Walker D.S.
        • Day S.
        • Diroff C.
        • et al.
        Reduced frequency prenatal visits in midwifery practice: attitudes and use.
        J Midwifery Womens Health. 2002; 47: 269-277
        • Machlin S.R.
        • Rohde F.
        Research findings no. 27: health care expenditures for uncomplicated pregnancies.
        Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality, Rockville, MD2007
      1. Antepartum care.
        in: Lockwood C.J. Lemons J.A. Guidelines for perinatal care. 6th ed. American Academy of Pediatrics, American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists, Washingon, DC2007
        • Khan-Neelofur D.
        • Gulmezoglu M.
        • Villar J.
        Who should provide routine antenatal care for low-risk women, and how often?.
        Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol. 1998; 12: 7-26
      2. Routine prenatal care.
        in: Akkerman D. Health care guideline. 14th ed. Institute for Clinical Systems Improvement, Bloomington, MN2010
        • Kaminski M.
        • Papiernik E.
        Multifactorial study of the risk of prematurity at 32 weeks of gestation, II: a comparison between empirical prediction and a discriminant function analysis.
        J Perinat Med. 1974; 2: 37-44
        • Papiernik-Berkhauer E.
        Coefficient de risque d'accouchement premature.
        Presse Med. 1969; 77: 793-794
        • Mercer B.M.
        • Goldenberg R.L.
        • Das A.
        • et al.
        The preterm prediction study: a clinical risk assessment system.
        Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1996; 174: 1885-1895
        • Creasy R.K.
        • Gummer B.A.
        • Liggins G.C.
        System for predicting spontaneous preterm birth.
        Obstet Gynecol. 1980; 55: 692-695
        • Iams J.D.
        Prediction and early detection of preterm labor.
        Obstet Gynecol. 2003; 101: 402-412
        • Murakawa H.
        • Utumi T.
        • Hasagawa I.
        • Tanaka K.
        • Fuzimori R.
        Evaluation of threatened preterm delivery by transvaginal ultrasonographic measurement of cervical length.
        Obstet Gynecol. 1993; 82: 829-832
        • Iams J.D.
        • Paraskos J.
        • Landon M.B.
        • Teteris J.N.
        • Johnson F.F.
        Cervical sonography in preterm labor.
        Obstet Gynecol. 1994; 84: 40-46
        • Iams J.D.
        • Casal D.
        • McGregor J.A.
        • et al.
        Fetal fibronectin improves the accuracy of diagnosis of preterm labor.
        Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1995; 173: 141-145
        • Melchiorre K.
        • Leslie K.
        • Prefumo F.
        • Bhide A.
        • Thilaganathan B.
        First-trimester uterine artery Doppler indices in the prediction of small-for-gestational age pregnancy and intrauterine growth restriction.
        Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2009; 33: 524-529
        • Dugoff L.
        • Lynch A.
        • Cioffi-Ragan D.
        • et al.
        First trimester uterine artery Doppler abnormalities predict subsequent intrauterine growth restriction.
        Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2005; 193: 1208-1212
        • Lee E.
        • Mitchell-Herzfeld S.D.
        • Lowenfels A.A.
        • Greene R.
        • Dorabawila V.
        • DuMont K.A.
        Reducing low birth weight through home visitation: a randomized controlled trial.
        Am J Prev Med. 2009; 36: 154-160
        • Morrison J.
        • Bergauer N.K.
        • Jacques D.
        • Coleman S.K.
        • Stanziano G.J.
        Telemedicine: cost-effective management of high-risk pregnancy.
        Manag Care. 2001; 10: 42-49
        • Hod M.
        • Kerner R.
        Telemedicine for antenatal surveillance of high-risk pregnancies with ambulatory and home fetal heart rate monitoring–an update.
        J Perinat Med. 2003; 31: 195-200
        • Newman R.B.
        • Sullivan S.A.
        • Menard M.K.
        • et al.
        South Carolina partners for preterm birth prevention: a regional perinatal initiative for the reduction of premature birth in a Medicaid population.
        Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2008; 199: 393.e1-393.e8
        • Ickovics J.R.
        • Kershaw T.S.
        • Westdahl C.
        • et al.
        Group prenatal care and preterm birth weight: results from a matched cohort study at public clinics.
        Obstet Gynecol. 2003; 102: 1051-1057
        • Ickovics J.R.
        • Kershaw T.S.
        • Westdahl C.
        • et al.
        Group prenatal care and perinatal outcomes: a randomized controlled trial.
        Obstet Gynecol. 2007; 110: 330-339
        • Rising S.S.
        Centering pregnancy: an interdisciplinary model of empowerment.
        J Nurse Midwifery. 1998; 43: 46-54
        • McDuffie R.S.
        • Beck A.
        • Bischoff K.
        • Cross J.
        • Orleans M.
        Effect of frequency of prenatal care visits on perinatal outcome among low-risk women: a randomized controlled trial.
        JAMA. 1996; 275: 847-851
        • Ward N.
        • Bayer S.
        • Ballard M.
        • Patience T.
        • Hume R.F.
        • Calhoun B.C.
        Impact of prenatal care with reduced frequency of visits in a residency teaching program.
        J Reprod Med. 1999; 44: 849-852
        • Walker D.S.
        • Koniak-Griffin D.
        Evaluation of a reduced-frequency prenatal visit schedule for low-risk women at a free-standing birthing center.
        J Nurse Midwifery. 1997; 42: 295-303