Objective
Study Design
Results
Conclusion
Key words
Purchase one-time access:
Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online accessOne-time access price info
- For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
- For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'
Subscribe:
Subscribe to American Journal of Obstetrics & GynecologyReferences
- Perinatal mortality and fetal growth restriction.in: Arulkumaran S. Gardosi J. Best practice and research. Elsevier, 2004: 397-410
- Customised antenatal growth charts.Lancet. 1992; 339: 283-287
- An adjustable fetal weight standard.Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 1995; 6: 168-174
- A customized standard to assess fetal growth in a US population.Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2009; 201: 25.e1-25.e7
- Birth weight from pregnancies dated by ultrasonography in a multicultural British population.BMJ. 1993; 307: 588-591
- First-trimester or second-trimester screening, or both, for Down's syndrome.N Engl J Med. 2005; 353: 2001-2011
- Smoothing reference centile curves: the LMS method and penalized likelihood.Stat Med. 1992; 11: 1305-1319
- In utero analysis of fetal growth: a sonographic weight standard.Radiology. 1991; 181: 129-133
- The relationship between intrauterine growth restriction and preterm delivery: an empirical approach using data from a European case-control study.BJOG. 2000; 107: 750-758
- Small-for-gestational age infants classified by customised or population birthweight centiles: impact of gestational age at delivery.Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2007; 197: 239.e1-239.e5
- Application of a customised birthweight standard in the assessment of perinatal outcome in a high risk population.BJOG. 1998; 105: 531-535
- Perinatal outcome in SGA births defined by customised versus population-based birthweight standards.BJOG. 2001; 108: 830-834
- Customised birthweight centiles predict SGA pregnancies with perinatal morbidity.BJOG. 2005; 112: 1026-1033
- Customized versus population-based birth weight standards for identifying growth restricted infants: a French multicenter study.Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2006; 194: 1042-1049
- Individualised norms of optimal fetal growth.Obstet Gynecol. 2008; 111: 1065-1076
- United States national reference for fetal growth.Obstet Gynecol. 1996; 87: 163-168
- Customised birthweight percentiles: does adjusting for maternal characteristics matter?.BJOG. 2008; 115: 1397-1404
- Parity and pregnancy outcomes.Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2002; 186: 274-278
- Racial differences in birthweight for gestational age and infant mortality in extremely low risk US populations.Pediatr Perinat Epidemiol. 1999; 13: 205-217
- The influence of socioeconomic status on stillbirth risk in Sweden.Int J Epidemiol. 2001; 20: 1296-1301
- Prepregnancy weight and the risk of adverse pregnancy outcomes.N Engl J Med. 1998; 338: 147-152
- The use of customised versus population-based birthweight standards in predicting perinatal mortality.BJOG. 2007; 114: 1301-1302
Gardosi J, Clausson B, Francis A. The value of customized centiles in assessing perinatal mortality risk associated with parity and maternal size. BJOG doi: 10.111/j.1471-0528.2009.02245.
Article Info
Publication History
Footnotes
Cite this article as: Gardosi J, Francis A. Adverse pregnancy outcome and association with small for gestational age birthweight by customized and population-based percentiles. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2009;201:28.e1-8.