Advertisement

Colposcopy to evaluate abnormal cervical cytology in 2008

  • Dana M. Chase
    Affiliations
    Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Chao Family Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of California, Irvine, Medical Center, Orange, CA
    Search for articles by this author
  • Marlene Kalouyan
    Affiliations
    Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Chao Family Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of California, Irvine, Medical Center, Orange, CA
    Search for articles by this author
  • Philip J. DiSaia
    Correspondence
    Reprints: Philip J. DiSaia, MD, Division Director, Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of California, Irvine, Medical Center, 101 The City Dr. South, Bldg. 56, Room 275, Orange, CA 92868
    Affiliations
    Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Chao Family Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of California, Irvine, Medical Center, Orange, CA
    Search for articles by this author
      The rates of cervical cancer in the United States are low in comparison with developing nations. Whereas the Papanicolaou smear has performed well in terms of dectecting both precursors of squamous cell carcinoma and squamous cell carcinoma of the cervix, this test has been less successful at identifying those women with the highest-risk premalignant disease. The use of human papillomavirus testing has also contributed to the improved sensitivity of screening for cervical cancer. In light of this, the colposcopy clinic retains high referral rates yet has poor diagnostic accuracy. Unfortunately, patients are triaged to follow-up for abnormal Papanicolaou smears based on algorithms that rely on the less evidence-based techniques of colposcopy. Therefore, the need to improve the specificity of colposcopic-guided biopsy remains. The colposcopic procedure is highlighted in this review and evaluated in terms of current literature on technique, the colposcopic impression, cervical biopsy, and methods proposed to enhance appreciation of the highest-risk lesions. By outlining certain flaws in technique and discussing the proposal of new tests to supplement the current standard of care, this review aimed to highlight the need for future research to maintain sensitivity but improve the specificity of colposcopy.

      Key words

      To read this article in full you will need to make a payment

      Purchase one-time access:

      Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online access
      One-time access price info
      • For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
      • For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'

      Subscribe:

      Subscribe to American Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology
      Already a print subscriber? Claim online access
      Already an online subscriber? Sign in
      Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect

      References

        • Garcia M.
        • Jemal A.
        • Ward E.M.
        • et al.
        Global cancer facts and figures 2007.
        American Cancer Society, Atlanta, GA2007
        • American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists
        Management of abnormal cervical cytology and histology.
        Obstet Gynecol. 2008; 112: 1419-1444
        • Pretorius R.G.
        • Zhang X.
        • Belinson J.L.
        • et al.
        Distribution of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia 2, 3 and cancer on the uterine cervix.
        J Low Genit Tract Dis. 2006; 10: 45-50
        • Jeronimo J.
        • Schiffman M.
        Colposcopy at a crossroads.
        Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2006; 195: 349-353
        • American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists
        Cervical cytology screening.
        Obstet Gynecol. 2003; 102: 417-427
        • ASCUS-LSIL Triage Study (ALTS) Group
        Results of a randomized trial on the management of cytology interpretations of atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance.
        Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2003; 188: 1383-1392
        • Apgar S.
        • Spitzer M.
        • Brotzman G.L.
        • Ignatavicius D.D.
        Colposcopy: principles and practice: an integrated textbook and atlas.
        1st ed. WB Saunders, Philadelphia, PA2002
        • Guido R.
        • Schiffman M.
        • Solomon D.
        • Burke L.
        Postcolposcopy management strategies for women referred with low-grade squamous intraepithelial lesions or human papillomavirus DNA—positive atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance: a two-year prospective study.
        Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2003; 188: 1401-1405
        • Cox J.T.
        • Schiffman M.
        • Solomon D.
        Prospective follow-up suggests similar risk of subsequent cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grade 2 or 3 among women with cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grade 1 or negative colposcopy and directed biopsy.
        Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2003; 188: 1406-1412
        • Kim J.J.
        • Wright T.C.
        • Goldie S.J.
        Cost-effectiveness of alternative triage strategies for atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance.
        JAMA. 2002; 287: 2382-2390
        • Galaal K.A.
        • Deane K.
        • Sangal S.
        • Lopes A.D.
        Interventions for reducing anxiety in women undergoing colposcopy.
        Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2007; 3
        • Jeronimo J.
        • Massad L.S.
        • Schiffman M.
        Visual appearance of the uterine cervix: correlation with human papillomavirus detection and type.
        Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2007; 197: 47-48
        • Yang B.
        • Pretorius R.G.
        • Belinson J.L.
        • et al.
        False negative colposcopy is associated with thinner cervical intraepithelial neoplasia 2 and 3.
        Gynecol Oncol. 2008; 110: 32-36
        • El-Shalakany A.H.
        • Saeed M.M.
        • Abdel-Aal M.R.
        • et al.
        Direct visual inspection of the cervix with Lugol iodine for the detection of premalignant lesions.
        J Low Genit Tract Dis. 2008; 12: 193-198
        • Muwonge R.
        • Walter S.D.
        • Wesley R.S.
        • et al.
        Assessing the gain in diagnostic performance when two visual inspection methods are combined for cervical cancer prevention.
        J Med Screen. 2007; 14: 144-150
        • Tam K.F.
        • Lee T.P.
        • Ngan H.Y.S.
        Hemostasis following cervical punch biopsy using Monsel's solution.
        Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2005; 88: 160-161
        • Martin-Hirsch P.L.
        • Kitchener H.
        Interventions for preventing blood loss during the treatment of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia.
        Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 1999; 1
        • Tomlinson A.E.
        • Hooper L.
        • Martin-Hirsch P.L.
        Pain relief for cervical colposcopy treatment (protocol).
        Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2006; 3
        • Swancutt D.R.
        • Luesley D.M.
        • Eastaugh J.L.
        • Wilson S.
        Anaesthetic choice in the colposcopy clinic: a retrospective analysis of routinely collected data.
        BJOG. 2008; 115: 646-652
        • Wong G.C.
        • Li R.H.
        • Wong T.S.
        • et al.
        The effect of topical lignocaine gel in pain relief for colposcopic assessment and biopsy: is it useful?.
        BJOG. 2008; 115: 1057-1060
        • Church L.
        • Oliver L.
        • Dobie S.
        • et al.
        Analgesia for colposcopy: double-masked, randomized comparison of ibuprofen and benzocaine gel.
        Obstet Gynecol. 2001; 97: 5-10
        • Hellsten C.
        • Sjöström K.
        • Lindqvist P.G.
        A 2-year follow-up study of anxiety and depression in women referred for colposcopy after an abnormal cervical smear.
        BJOG. 2008; 115: 212-218
        • Mousavi A.S.
        • Fakour R.
        • Gilani M.M.
        • Behtash N.
        • Ghaemmaghami F.
        • Karimi Z.M.
        A prospective study to evaluate the correlation between Reid colposcopic index impression and biopsy histology.
        J Low Genit Tract Dis. 2007; 11: 147-150
        • Ferris D.G.
        • Litaker M.
        Interobserver agreement for colposcopy quality control using digitized colposcopic images during the ALTS trial.
        J Low Genit Tract Dis. 2005; 9: 29-35
        • Hearp M.L.
        • Locante A.M.
        • Ben-Rubin M.
        • et al.
        Validity of sampling error as a cause of noncorrelation.
        Cancer. 2007; 111: 275-279
        • Cantor S.B.
        • Cárdenas-Turanzas M.
        • Cox D.D.
        • et al.
        Accuracy of colposcopy in the diagnostic setting compared with the screening setting.
        Obstet Gynecol. 2008; 111: 7-14
        • Massad L.S.
        • Jeronimo J.
        • Schiffman M.
        Interobserver agreement in the assessment of components of colposcopic grading.
        Obstet Gynecol. 2008; 111: 1279-1284
        • Baum M.E.
        • Rader J.S.
        • Gibb R.K.
        • et al.
        Colposcopic accuracy of obstetrics and gynecology residents.
        Gynecol Oncol. 2006; 103: 966-970
        • Gage J.C.
        • Hanson V.W.
        • Abbey K.
        • et al.
        Number of cervical biopsies and sensitivity of colposcopy.
        Obstet Gynecol. 2006; 108: 264-272
        • Pretorius R.G.
        • Peterson P.
        • Azizi F.
        • et al.
        Subsequent risk and presentation of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN) 3 or cancer after a colposcopic diagnosis of CIN 1 or less.
        Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2006; 195: 1260-1265
        • Pretorius R.G.
        • Bao Y.P.
        • Belinson J.L.
        • et al.
        Inappropriate gold standard bias in cervical cancer screening studies.
        Int J Cancer. 2007; 121: 2218-2224
        • Cox J.T.
        More questions about the accuracy of colposcopy: what does this mean for cervical cancer prevention?.
        Obstet Gynecol. 2008; 111: 1266-1267
        • Solomon D.
        • Stoler M.
        • Jeronimo J.
        • et al.
        Diagnostic utility of endocervical curettage in women undergoing colposcopy for equivocal or low-grade cytologic abnormalities.
        Obstet Gynecol. 2007; 10: 88-95
        • Oyama I.A.
        • Wakabayashi M.T.
        • Frattarelli L.C.
        • et al.
        Local anesthetic reduces the pain of colposcopic biopsies: a randomized trial.
        Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2003; 188: 1164-1165
        • Alonso I.
        • Torné A.
        • Puig-Tintoré L.M.
        • et al.
        High-risk cervical epithelial neoplasia grade 1 treated by loop electrosurgical excision: follow-up and value of HPV testing.
        Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2007; 197: 359.e1-359.e6
        • Liu H.
        • Shi J.
        • Wilkerson M.
        • et al.
        Immunohistochemical detection of p16INK4a in liquid-based cytology specimens on cell block sections.
        Cancer. 2007; 111: 74-82
        • Carozzi F.
        • Confortini M.
        • Palma P.D.
        • et al.
        Use of p16-INK4A overexpression to increase the specificity of human papillomavirus testing: a nested substudy of the NTCC randomised controlled trial.
        Lancet Oncol. 2008; 9: 937-945
        • Wentzensen N.
        • Bergeron C.
        • Cas F.
        • et al.
        Triage of women with ASCUS and LSIL cytology: use of qualitative assessment of p16INK4a positive cells to identify patients with high-grade cervical intraepithelial neoplasia.
        Cancer. 2007; 111: 58-66
        • Horn L.C.
        • Reichert A.
        • Oster A.
        • et al.
        Immunostaining for p16INK4a used as a conjunctive tool improves interobserver agreement of the histologic diagnosis of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia.
        Am J Surg Pathol. 2008; 32: 502-512
        • Gurrola-Díaz C.M.
        • Suárez-Rincón A.E.
        • Vázquez-Camacho G.
        • et al.
        P16INK4a immunohistochemistry improves the reproducibility of the histological diagnosis of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia in cone biopsies.
        Gynecol Oncol. 2008; 111: 120-124
        • Mulvany N.J.
        • Allen D.G.
        • Wilson S.M.
        Diagnostic utility of p16INK4a: a reappraisal of its use in cervical biopsies.
        Pathology. 2008; 40: 335-344
        • Overmeer R.M.
        • Henken F.E.
        • Snijders P.J.
        • et al.
        Association between dense CADM1 promoter methylation and reduced protein expression in high-grade CIN and cervical SCC.
        J Pathol. 2008; 215: 388-397
        • Strachan T.
        • Read A.P.
        PAX genes.
        Curr Opin Genet Dev. 1994; 4: 427-438
        • Terra A.P.
        • Murta E.F.
        • Maluf P.J.
        • et al.
        Aberrant promoter methylation can be useful as a marker of recurrent disease in patients with cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grade III.
        Tumori. 2007; 93: 572-579
        • Lai H.C.
        • Lin Y.W.
        • Huang T.H.
        • et al.
        Identification of novel DNA methylation markers in cervical cancer.
        Int J Cancer. 2008; 123: 161-167
        • Kahn S.L.
        • Ronnett B.M.
        • Gravitt P.E.
        • et al.
        Quantitative methylation-specific PCR for the detection of aberrant DNA methylation in liquid-based Pap tests.
        Cancer. 2008; 114: 57-64
        • Shivapurkar N.
        • Sherman M.E.
        • Stastny V.
        • et al.
        Evaluation of candidate methylation markers to detect cervical neoplasia.
        Gynecol Oncol. 2007; 107: 549-553
        • Feng Q.
        • Hawes S.E.
        • Stern J.E.
        • et al.
        Promoter hypermethylation of tumor suppressor genes in urine from patients with cervical neoplasia.
        Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2007; 16: 1178-1184
        • Cardenas-Turanzas M.
        • Freeberg J.A.
        • Benedet J.L.
        • et al.
        The clinical effectiveness of optical spectroscopy for the in vivo diagnosis of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia: where are we?.
        Gynecol Oncol. 2007; 107: S138-S146
        • Siddiqi A.M.
        • Li H.
        • Faruque F.
        • et al.
        Use of hyperspectral imaging to distinguish normal, precancerous, and cancerous cells.
        Cancer. 2008; 114: 13-21
        • Freeberg J.A.
        • Benedet J.L.
        • West L.A.
        • et al.
        The clinical effectiveness of fluorescence and reflectance spectroscopy for the in vivo diagnosis of cervical neoplasia: an analysis by phase of trial design.
        Gynecol Oncol. 2007; 107: S270-S280
        • Freeberg J.A.
        • Benedet J.L.
        • MacAulay C.
        • et al.
        The performance of fluorescence and reflectance spectroscopy for the in vivo diagnosis of cervical neoplasia; point probe versus multispectral approaches.
        Gynecol Oncol. 2007; 107: S248-S255
        • Shinn E.
        • Le T.
        • Gallegos J.
        • et al.
        A pilot analysis of multispectral digital colposcopy for women with high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion (HGSIL) Pap smear results.
        Gynecol Oncol. 2007; 107: S83-S85
        • Werner C.L.
        • Griffith W.F.
        • Ashfaq R.
        • et al.
        Comparison of human papilloma virus testing and spectroscopy combined with cervical cytology for the detection of high-grade cervical neoplasia.
        J Low Genit Tract Dis. 2007; 11: 73-79
        • DeSantis T.
        • Chakhtoura N.
        • Twiggs L.
        • et al.
        Spectroscopic imaging as a triage test for cervical disease: a prospective multicenter clinical trial.
        J Low Genit Tract Dis. 2007; 11: 18-24
        • Alvarez R.D.
        • Wright T.C.
        Effective cervical neoplasia detection with a novel optical detection system: a randomized trial.
        Gynecol Oncol. 2007; 104: 281-289
        • Raab S.S.
        • Grzybicki D.M.
        • Zarbo R.J.
        • et al.
        Frequency and outcome of cervical cancer prevention failures in the United States.
        Am J Clin Pathol. 2007; 128: 817-824