Advertisement

Glycine absorption in operative hysteroscopy: the impact of anesthesia

      Objective

      This study aimed to evaluate the impact of anesthesia on the absorption of glycine in operative hysteroscopy.

      Study Design

      A retrospective cohort study was performed over 2 years. The absorption of glycine was compared among general anesthesia, local anesthesia with intravenous sedation, and spinal anesthesia. Multiple logistic regression analyses were performed.

      Results

      In all, 282 operative hysteroscopies were reviewed. The median absorption was 145 mL (10th-90th centile: 0-963 mL) for general anesthesia, 35 mL (10th-90th centile: 0-389 mL) for local anesthesia, and 100 mL (10th-90th centile: 0-500 mL) for spinal anesthesia (P = .002). In comparison with general anesthesia, local anesthesia was associated with lower rate of absorption of 500-1000 mL (4.2% vs 13.4%) and of 1000-1500 mL (3.6% vs 9.8; P = .002). Laparoscopic tubal ligation performed during the procedure was also associated with higher glycine absorption (odds ratio, 3.63; 95% confidence interval, 1.12-11.84).

      Conclusions

      Local anesthesia with sedation is associated with significantly decreased glycine absorption and lower rate of absorption > 500 mL when compared with general anesthesia.

      Key words

      To read this article in full you will need to make a payment

      Purchase one-time access:

      Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online access
      One-time access price info
      • For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
      • For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'

      Subscribe:

      Subscribe to American Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology
      Already a print subscriber? Claim online access
      Already an online subscriber? Sign in
      Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect

      References

        • Eskandar M.A.
        • Vilos G.A.
        • Aletebi F.A.
        • Tummon I.S.
        Hysteroscopic endometrial ablation is an effective alternative to hysterectomy in women with menorrhagia and large uteri.
        J Am Assoc Gynecol Laparosc. 2000; 7: 339-345
        • Overton C.
        • Hargreaves J.
        • Maresh M.
        A national survey of the complications of endometrial destruction for menstrual disorders: the MISTLETOE study.
        Br J Obstet Gynaecol. 1997; 104: 1351-1359
        • Mushambi M.C.
        • Williamson K.
        Anesthetic considerations for hysteroscopic surgery.
        Best Pract Res Clin Anaesthesiol. 2002; 16: 35-51
        • Witz C.A.
        • Silverberg K.M.
        • Burns W.N.
        • Schenken R.S.
        • Olive D.L.
        Complications associated with the absorption of hysteroscopic fluid media.
        Fertil Steril. 1993; 60: 745-756
        • American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists
        ACOG technology assessment in obstetrics and gynecology, number 4, August 2005: hysteroscopy.
        Obstet Gynecol. 2005; 106: 439-442
        • Propst A.M.
        • Liberman R.F.
        • Harlow B.L.
        • Ginsburg E.S.
        Complications of hysteroscopic surgery: predicting patients at risk.
        Obstet Gynecol. 2000; 96: 517-520
        • Hahn R.G.
        Fluid absorption in endoscopic surgery.
        Br J Anaesth. 2006; 96: 8-20
        • Sowter M.C.
        • Lethaby A.
        • Singla A.A.
        Pre-operative endometrial thinning agents before hysteroscopic surgery for heavy menstrual bleeding.
        Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2002; 3 (CD001124)
        • Goldenberg M.
        • Cohen S.B.
        • Etchin A.
        • Mashiach S.
        • Seidman D.S.
        A randomized prospective comparative study of general versus epidural anesthesia for transcervical hysteroscopic endometrial resection.
        Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2001; 184: 273-276
        • Stoelting R.K.
        • Hillier S.C.
        Pharmacology and physiology in anesthetic practice.
        in: 4th ed. Lippincott Williams and Wilkins, Philadelphia2006: 903
        • Ferry J.
        • Rankin L.
        Transcervical resection of the endometrium using intracervical block only: a review of 278 procedures.
        Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol. 1994; 34: 457-461
        • Murdoch J.A.
        • Gan T.J.
        Anesthesia for hysteroscopy.
        Anesthesiol Clin North America. 2001; 19: 125-140
        • Safran D.B.
        • Orlando III, R.
        Physiologic effects of pneumoperitoneum.
        Am J Surg. 1994; 167: 281-286
        • Loffer F.D.
        • Bradley L.D.
        • Brill A.I.
        • Brooks P.G.
        • Cooper J.M.
        Hysteroscopic fluid monitoring guidelines.
        J Am Assoc Gynecol Laparosc. 2000; 7: 167-168
        • Shveiky D.
        • Rojansky N.
        • Revel A.
        • Benshushan A.
        • Laufer N.
        • Shushan A.
        Complications of hysteroscopic surgery: “beyond the learning curve.”.
        J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2007; 14: 218-222