Advertisement

To the point: reviews in medical education—the Objective Structured Clinical Examination

      This article, the eighth in the To the Point Series prepared by the Association of Professors of Gynecology and Obstetrics Undergraduate Medical Education Committee, discusses the effectiveness of the Objective Structured Clinical Examination (OSCE) for assessment of learners' knowledge, skills, and behaviors. The OSCE has also been used for the appraisal of residents and physicians undergoing licensure examinations; herein we focus on its application to undergraduate medical education. We review evidence for best practices and recommendations on effective use of the OSCE and requirements for and challenges to its implementation, including creative ways to design an OSCE program with a limited budget. We discuss its role in providing formative and summative feedback and describe learner performance on the OSCE as the OSCE relates to subsequent testing, including US Medical Licensing Examination step 1. A representative case with assessment used at the authors' medical schools is included.

      Key words

      To read this article in full you will need to make a payment

      Purchase one-time access:

      Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online access
      One-time access price info
      • For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
      • For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'

      Subscribe:

      Subscribe to American Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology
      Already a print subscriber? Claim online access
      Already an online subscriber? Sign in
      Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect

      References

        • Kassebaum D.G.
        • Eaglen R.H.
        Shortcomings in the evaluation of students' clinical skills and behaviors in medical school.
        Acad Med. 1999; 74: 842-849
        • Wilkerson L.
        • Lee M.
        Assessing physical examination skills of senior medical students: knowing how versus knowing when.
        Acad Med. 2003; 78: S30-S32
        • Harden R.M.
        • Stevenson M.
        • Downie W.W.
        • Wilson G.M.
        Assessment of clinical competence using objective structured examination.
        Br Med J. 1975; 1: 447-451
        • Adamo G.
        Simulated and standardized patients in OSCEs: achievements and challenges 1992-2003.
        Med Teach. 2003; 25: 262-270
        • McFaul P.B.
        • Taylor D.J.
        • Howie P.W.
        The assessment of clinical competence in obstetrics and gynaecology in two medical schools by an objective structured clinical examination.
        Br J Obstet Gynaecol. 1993; 100: 842-846
        • Newble D.
        Techniques for measuring clinical competence: objective structured clinical examinations.
        Med Educ. 2004; 38: 199-203
        • Barzansky B.
        • Etzel S.I.
        Educational programs in US medical schools, 2002-2003.
        JAMA. 2003; 290: 1190-1196
      1. Common Program Requirements: General Competencies: Approved by the ACGME Board Feb. 13, 2007 [Internet]. Chicago: Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education. c2000-2008 [cited May 13, 2008]. Available at: http://www.acgme.org/outcome/comp/GeneralCompetenciesStandards21307.pdf. Accessed June 1, 2008.

        • Frohna J.G.
        • Gruppen L.D.
        • Fliegel J.E.
        • Mangrulkar R.S.
        Development of an evaluation of medical student competence in evidence-based medicine using a computer-based OSCE station.
        Teach Learn Med. 2006; 18: 267-272
        • Mavis B.E.
        • Henry R.C.
        Between a rock and a hard place: finding a place for the OSCE in medical education.
        Med Educ. 2002; 36: 408-409
        • Mazor K.M.
        • Zanetti M.L.
        • Alper E.J.
        • et al.
        Assessing professionalism in the context of an objective structured clinical examination: an in-depth study of the rating process.
        Med Educ. 2007; 41: 331-340
        • Tamblyn R.
        • Abrahamowicz M.
        • Dauphinee D.
        • et al.
        Physician scores on a national clinical skills examination as predictors of complaints to medical regulatory authorities.
        JAMA. 2007; 298: 993-1001
        • Selby C.
        • Osman L.
        • Davis M.
        • Lee M.
        Set up and run an objective structured clinical exam.
        BMJ. 1995; 310: 1187-1190
        • van der Vleuten C.
        Validity of final examinations in undergraduate medical training.
        BMJ. 2000; 321: 1217-1219
        • Tervo R.C.
        • Dimitrievich E.
        • Trujillo A.L.
        • Whittle K.
        • Redinius P.
        • Wellman L.
        The Objective Structured Clinical Examination (OSCE) in the clinical clerkship: an overview.
        S D J Med. 1997; 50: 153-156
        • Chenot J.F.
        • Simmenroth-Nayda A.
        • Koch A.
        • et al.
        Can student tutors act as examiners in an objective structured clinical examination?.
        Med Educ. 2007; 41: 1032-1038
        • Nackman G.B.
        • Griggs M.
        • Galt J.
        Implementation of a novel Web-based objective structured clinical evaluation.
        Surgery. 2006; 140: 206-211
        • Doig C.J.
        • Harasym P.H.
        • Fick G.H.
        • Baumber J.S.
        The effects of examiner background, station organization, and time of exam on OSCE scores assessing undergraduate medical students' physical examination skills.
        Acad Med. 2000; 75: S96-S98
      2. Association for Standardized Patient Educators [Internet]. New Orleans: Association of Standardized Patient Educators; c2008 [cited 2008 August]. Available from: http://www.aspeducators.org.

        • Wilkinson T.J.
        • Frampton C.M.
        • Thompson-Fawcett M.
        • Egan T.
        Objectivity in objective structured clinical examinations: checklists are no substitute for examiner commitment.
        Acad Med. 2003; 78: 219-223
        • Kramer A.
        • Muijtjens A.
        • Jansen K.
        • Dusman H.
        • Tan L.
        • van der Vleuten C.
        Comparison of a rational and an empirical standard setting procedure for an OSCE: objective structured clinical examinations.
        Med Educ. 2003; 37 (Erratum in: Med Educ 2003;37:574): 132-139
        • Kaufman D.M.
        • Mann K.V.
        • Muijtjens A.M.
        • van der Vleuten C.P.
        A comparison of standard-setting procedures for an OSCE in undergraduate medical education.
        Acad Med. 2000; 75: 267-271
        • Boursicot K.A.
        • Roberts T.E.
        • Pell G.
        Using borderline methods to compare passing standards for OSCEs at graduation across three medical schools.
        Med Educ. 2007; 41: 1024-1031
        • Morrison H.
        • McNally H.
        • Wylie C.
        • McFaul P.
        • Thompson W.
        The passing score in the objective structured clinical examination.
        Med Educ. 1996; 30: 345-348
        • Martin I.G.
        • Stark P.
        • Jolly B.
        Benefiting from clinical experience: the influence of learning style and clinical experience on performance in an undergraduate objective structured clinical examination.
        Med Educ. 2000; 34: 530-534
        • Blaskiewicz R.J.
        • Park R.S.
        • Chibnall J.T.
        • Powell J.K.
        The influence of testing context and clinical rotation order on students' OSCE performance.
        Acad Med. 2004; 79: 597-601
        • Bienstock J.L.
        • Tzou W.S.
        • Martin S.A.
        • Fox H.E.
        Effect of student ethnicity on interpersonal skills and objective standardized clinical examination scores.
        Obstet Gynecol. 2000; 96: 1011-1013
        • Keely E.
        • Myers K.
        • Dojeiji S.
        Can written communication skills be tested in an objective structured clinical examination format?.
        Acad Med. 2002; 77: 82-86
        • Zakowski L.J.
        • Seibert C.
        • VanEyck S.
        • Skochelak S.
        • Dottl S.
        • Albanese M.
        Can specialists and generalists teach clinical skills to second-year medical students with equal effectiveness?.
        Acad Med. 2002; 77: 1030-1033
        • McLaughlin K.
        • Gregor L.
        • Jones A.
        • Coderre S.
        Can standardized patients replace physicians as OSCE examiners?.
        BMC Med Educ. 2006; 6: 12
        • Simon S.R.
        • Volkan K.
        • Hamann C.
        • Duffey C.
        • Fletcher S.W.
        The relationship between second-year medical students' OSCE scores and USMLE Step 1 scores.
        Med Teach. 2002; 24: 535-539
        • Probert C.S.
        • Cahill D.J.
        • McCann G.L.
        • Ben-Shlomo Y.
        Traditional finals and OSCEs in predicting consultant and self-reported clinical skills of PRHOs: a pilot study.
        Med Educ. 2003; 37 (Erratum in: Med Educ 2003;37:1058): 597-602
        • Dijcks R.
        • Prince K.J.
        • van der Vleuten C.P.
        • Scherpbier A.J.
        Validity of objective tests towards peer-rated competence by students.
        Med Teach. 2003; 25: 273-276