Advertisement

New pelvic symptoms are common after reconstructive pelvic surgery

Published:October 10, 2008DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajog.2008.08.010

      Objective

      The objective of the study was to determine the incidence of new pelvic symptoms after reconstructive pelvic surgery and its impact on surgical outcomes.

      Study Design

      Women undergoing surgery for prolapse (POP) and/or urinary incontinence underwent preoperative and 3 month postoperative assessment: urodynamics, pelvic organ prolapse quantification, and Pelvic Floor Distress Inventory (PFDI-20). Postoperative assessment included Patient Global Impression of Improvement (PGI-I), satisfaction, and new symptom questionnaire.

      Results

      Forty-two percent (33/79) reported new pelvic symptoms: incontinence (27%), urgency (25%), frequency (23%), difficult defecation (22%), voiding difficulty (10%), and POP (2%). Women with new symptoms differed from those without: higher postoperative mean PFDI-20 scores (P < .001 for Urinary Distress Inventory, P = .02 for Pelvic Organ Prolapse Distress Inventory, and P = .02 Colorectal-Anal Inventory); 58% vs 83% improved on PGI-I, compared with 83% (P = .01); 33% vs 83% completely satisfied (P ≤ .001).

      Conclusion

      Women report high rates of new pelvic symptoms after surgery, which are associated with decreased self-reported improvement and satisfaction despite improvement on validated quality of life measures.

      Key words

      To read this article in full you will need to make a payment

      Purchase one-time access:

      Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online access
      One-time access price info
      • For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
      • For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'

      Subscribe:

      Subscribe to American Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology
      Already a print subscriber? Claim online access
      Already an online subscriber? Sign in
      Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect

      References

        • Dawn A.G.
        • Lee P.P.
        Patient expectations for medical and surgical care: a review of the literature and applications to ophthalmology.
        Surv Ophthalmol. 2004; 49: 513-524
        • Wilson S.J.
        • Saling M.M.
        • Kincade P.
        • Bladin P.F.
        Patient expectations of temporal lobe surgery.
        Epilepsia. 1998; 39: 167-174
        • Mancuso C.A.
        • Salvati E.A.
        • Johanson N.A.
        • Peterson M.G.
        • Charlson M.E.
        Patients' expectations and satisfaction with total hip arthroplasty.
        J Arthroplasty. 1997; 12: 387-396
        • Hullfish K.L.
        • Bovbjerg V.E.
        • Steers W.D.
        Patient-centered goals for pelvic floor dysfunction surgery: long-term follow-up.
        Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2004; 191: 201-205
        • Elkadry E.A.
        • Kenton K.S.
        • FitzGerald M.P.
        • Shott S.
        • Brubaker L.
        Patient-selected goals: a new perspective on surgical outcome.
        Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2003; 189 (discussion 1557-8): 1551-1557
        • Mahajan S.T.
        • Elkadry E.A.
        • Kenton K.S.
        • Shott S.
        • Brubaker L.
        Patient-centered surgical outcomes: the impact of goal achievement and urge incontinence on patient satisfaction one year after surgery.
        Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2006; 194: 722-728
        • Davis T.L.
        • Lukacz E.S.
        • Luber K.M.
        • Nager C.W.
        Determinants of patient satisfaction after the tension-free vaginal tape procedure.
        Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2004; 191: 176-181
        • Barber M.D.
        • Walters M.D.
        • Bump R.C.
        Short forms of two condition-specific quality-of-life questionnaires for women with pelvic floor disorders (PFDI-20 and PFIQ-7).
        Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2005; 193: 103-113
        • Bump R.C.
        • Mattiasson A.
        • Bo K.
        • et al.
        The standardization of terminology of female pelvic organ prolapse and pelvic floor dysfunction.
        Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1996; 175: 10-17
        • Yalcin I.
        • Bump R.C.
        Validation of two global impression questionnaires for incontinence.
        Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2003; 189: 98-101
        • Albo M.E.
        • Richter H.E.
        • Brubaker L.
        • et al.
        Burch colposuspension versus fascial sling to reduce urinary stress incontinence.
        N Engl J Med. 2007; 356: 2143-2155
        • Sung V.W.
        • Schleinitz M.D.
        • Rardin C.R.
        • Ward R.M.
        • Myers D.L.
        Comparison of retropubic vs transobturator approach to midurethral slings: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
        Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2007; 197: 3-11
        • Burgio K.L.
        • Nygaard I.E.
        • Richter H.E.
        • et al.
        Bladder symptoms 1 year after abdominal sacrocolpopexy with and without Burch colposuspension in women without preoperative stress incontinence symptoms.
        Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2007; 197: 647.e1-647.e6
        • Foster Sr, R.T.
        • Barber M.D.
        • Parasio M.F.
        • Walters M.D.
        • Weidner A.C.
        • Amundsen C.L.
        A prospective assessment of overactive bladder symptoms in a cohort of elderly women who underwent transvaginal surgery for advanced pelvic organ prolapse.
        Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2007; 197: 82.e1-82.e4
        • Lowenstein L.
        • Kenton K.
        • Pierce K.
        • Fitzgerald M.P.
        • Mueller E.R.
        • Brubaker L.
        Patients' pelvic goals change after initial urogynecologic consultation.
        Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2007; 197: 640.e1-640.e3
        • Kenton K.
        • Pham T.
        • Mueller E.
        • Brubaker L.
        Patient preparedness: an important predictor of surgical outcome.
        Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2007; 197: 654.e1-654.e6