Can a prediction model for vaginal birth after cesarean also predict the probability of morbidity related to a trial of labor?

Published:September 26, 2008DOI:


      The objective of the study was to determine whether a model for predicting vaginal birth after cesarean (VBAC) can also predict the probabilty of morbidity associated with a trial of labor (TOL).

      Study Design

      Using a previously published prediction model, we categorized women with 1 prior cesarean by chance of VBAC. Prevalence of maternal and neonatal morbidity was stratfied by probability of VBAC success and delivery approach.


      Morbidity became less frequent as the predicted chance of VBAC increased among women who underwent TOL (P < .001) but not elective repeat cesarean section (ERCS) (P > .05). When the predicted chance of VBAC was less than 70%, women undergoing a TOL were more likely to have maternal morbidity (relative risk [RR], 2.2; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.5-3.1) than those who underwent an ERCS; when the predicted chance of VBAC was at least 70%, total maternal morbidity was not different between the 2 groups (RR, 0.8; 95% CI, 0.5-1.2). The results were similar for neonatal morbidity.


      A prediction model for VBAC provides information regarding the chance of TOL-related morbidity and suggests that maternal morbidity is not greater for those women who undergo TOL than those who undergo ERCS if the chance of VBAC is at least 70%.

      Key words

      To read this article in full you will need to make a payment

      Purchase one-time access:

      Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online access
      One-time access price info
      • For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
      • For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'


      Subscribe to American Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology
      Already a print subscriber? Claim online access
      Already an online subscriber? Sign in
      Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect


        • McMahon M.J.
        • Luther E.R.
        • Bowes W.A.
        • Olshan A.F.
        Comparison of a trial of labor with an elecitve second cesarean section.
        N Engl J Med. 1996; 335: 689-695
        • El-Sayed Y.Y.
        • Watkins M.M.
        • Fix M.
        • Druzin M.L.
        • Pullen K.M.
        • Caughey A.B.
        Perinatal outcomes after successful and failed trials of labor after cesarean delivery.
        Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2007; 196: 583.e1-583.e5
        • Guise J.M.
        • Merlin M.
        • McDonagh M.
        • Osterweil P.
        • Chan B.
        • Helfand M.
        Safety of vaginal birth after cesarean: a systematic review.
        Obstet Gynecol. 2004; 103: 420-429
        • Cahill A.G.
        • Stamilio D.M.
        • Odibo A.O.
        • et al.
        Is vaginal birth after cesarean or elective repeat cesarean safer in women with a prior vaginal delivery?.
        Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2006; 195: 1143-1147
        • Caughey A.B.
        • Shipp T.D.
        • Repke J.T.
        • Zelop C.
        • Cohen A.
        • Lieberman E.
        Trial of labor after cesarean delivery: the effect of previous vaginal delivery.
        Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1998; 179: 938-941
        • Grobman W.A.
        • Gilbert S.
        • Landon M.B.
        • et al.
        Outcomes of induction of labor after one prior cesarean.
        Obstet Gynecol. 2007; 109: 262-269
        • Grobman W.A.
        • Lai Y.
        • Landon M.B.
        • et al.
        Development of a nomogram for prediction of a vaginal birth after cesarean delivery.
        Obstet Gynecol. 2007; 109: 806-812
        • Landon M.B.
        • Hauth J.C.
        • Leveno K.J.
        • et al.
        Maternal and perinatal outcomes associated with a trial of labor after prior cesarean delivery.
        N Engl J Med. 2004; 351: 2581-2589
        • Agresti A.
        Categorical data analysis.
        in: John Wiley and Sons, New York1990: 100-102
        • Menacker F.
        • Declercq E.
        • Macdorman M.F.
        Cesarean delivery: background, trends, and epidemiology.
        Semin Perinatol. 2006; 30: 235-241
        • Macones G.A.
        • Peipert J.
        • Nelson D.B.
        • et al.
        Maternal complications with vaginal birth after cesarean delivery: a multicenter study.
        Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2005; 193: 1656-1662