Advertisement

Pelvic organ prolapse: is there a difference in POPQ exam results based on time of day, morning or afternoon?

      Objective

      The purpose of this study was to determine if there is any difference between AM and PM POPQ exam results.

      Study Design

      Prospective, IRB approved study of women presenting with pelvic organ prolapse symptoms. Initial POPQ exams were performed in the morning or afternoon; a second exam was performed within 4 weeks at the opposite time of day. Statistical analysis included Wilcoxon signed rank test, paired t test, Spearman correlation, and Stuart-Maxwell test.

      Results

      The study consisted of 32 subjects. Mean age was 58.8 years, mean BMI 28.6, median parity 2.0, 75% white, 22% black, and 3% Hispanic. The POPQ exam stages were 47% stage II, 50% stage III, and 3.0% stage IV. There was no significant difference for the 9 POPQ exam measures between morning and afternoon exams. There was good agreement between AM and PM POPQ ordinal stages (Stewart Maxwell P = 1.0, kappa 0.76).

      Conclusion

      There is no difference between AM and PM POPQ exam results.

      Key words

      To read this article in full you will need to make a payment

      Purchase one-time access:

      Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online access
      One-time access price info
      • For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
      • For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'

      Subscribe:

      Subscribe to American Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology
      Already a print subscriber? Claim online access
      Already an online subscriber? Sign in
      Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect

      References

      1. Slieker-ten HMCP, Vierhout M, Bloembergen H, Schoenmaker G. Distribution of pelvic organ prolapse in a general population: Prevalence, severity, etiology and relation with the function of pelvic floor muscles. Abstract presented at the Joint meeting of the ICS and IUGA, August 25-27, 2004, Paris, France.

        • Swift S.E.
        • Woodman P.
        • O'Boyle A.
        • et al.
        Pelvic Organ Support Study (POSST); the distribution, clinical definition and epidemiology of pelvic organ support defects.
        Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2005; 192: 795-806
        • Wilcox L.S.
        • Koonin L.M.
        • Pokras R.
        • Struass L.T.
        • Xia Z.
        • Peterson H.B.
        Hysterectomy in the United States, 1988-1990.
        Obstet Gynecol. 1994; 83: 549-555
        • Bump R.C.
        • Mattiasson A.
        • Bo k
        • et al.
        The standardization of terminology of female pelvic floor dysfunction.
        Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1996; 175: 10-17
        • Hall A.F.
        • Theofrastous J.P.
        • Cundiff G.C.
        • et al.
        Interobserver and intraobserver reliability of the proposed International Continence Society, Society of Gynecologic Surgeons, and the American Urogynecologic Society pelvic organ prolapse classification system.
        Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1996; 175: 1467-1469
        • Kobak W.H.
        • Rosenberger K.
        • Walters M.D.
        Interobserver variation in the assessment of pelvic organ prolapse.
        Int J Urogynecol Pelvic Floor Dysfunct. 1996; 7: 121-124
        • Swift S.E.
        • Herring M.D.
        Comparison of pelvic organ prolapse in the dorsal lithotomy versus the standing position.
        Obstet Gynecol. 1998; 91: 961-964

      References

        • Luber K.M.
        • Boevo S.
        • Choe J.Y.
        The demographics of pelvic floor disorders: current observations and future projections.
        Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2001; 184: 1496-1501
        • Bump R.C.
        • Mattisson A.
        • Bo K.
        • et al.
        The standardization of terminology of female pelvic organ prolapse and pelvic organ dysfunction.
        Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1996; 175: 10-17
        • Bland D.R.
        • Earle B.B.
        • Vitolins M.Z.
        • Burke G.
        Use of the pelvic organ prolapse staging system of the International Continence Society, American Urolgynecologie Society, and the Society of Gynecologic Surgeons in perimenopausal women.
        Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1999; 181: 1324-1328
        • Swift S.E.
        The distribution of pelvic organ support in a population of female subjects seen for routine gynecologic health care.
        Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2000; 183: 277-285