Prediction of pelvic organ prolapse using an artificial neural network


      The objective of this investigation was to test the ability of a feedforward artificial neural network (ANN) to differentiate patients who have pelvic organ prolapse (POP) from those who retain good pelvic organ support.

      Study Design

      Following institutional review board approval, patients with POP (n = 87) and controls with good pelvic organ support (n = 368) were identified from the urogynecology research database. Historical and clinical information was extracted from the database. Data analysis included the training of a feedforward ANN, variable selection, and external validation of the model with an independent data set.


      Twenty variables were used. The median-performing ANN model used a median of 3 (quartile 1:3 to quartile 3:5) variables and achieved an area under the receiver operator curve of 0.90 (external, independent validation set). Ninety percent sensitivity and 83% specificity were obtained in the external validation by ANN classification.


      Feedforward ANN modeling is applicable to the identification and prediction of POP.

      Key words

      To read this article in full you will need to make a payment

      Purchase one-time access:

      Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online access
      One-time access price info
      • For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
      • For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'


      Subscribe to American Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology
      Already a print subscriber? Claim online access
      Already an online subscriber? Sign in
      Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect


        • Mant J.
        • Painter R.
        • Vessey M.
        Epidemiology of genital prolapse: Observations from the Oxford Family Planning Association study.
        Br J Obstet Gynecol. 1997; 104: 579-585
        • Olsen A.L.
        • Smith V.J.
        • Bergstrom J.O.
        • Colling J.C.
        • Clark A.L.
        Epidemiology of surgically managed pelvic organ prolapse and urinary incontinence.
        Obstet Gynecol. 1997; 89: 501-506
        • Wilcox L.S.
        • Koonin L.M.
        • Pokras R.
        • Struass L.T.
        • Xia Z.
        • Peterson H.B.
        Hysterectomy in the United States, 1988-1990.
        Obstet Gynecol. 1994; 83: 549-555
        • Weber A.M.
        • Walters M.D.
        • Piedmonte M.R.
        • Ballard L.A.
        Anterior colporrhaphy: A randomized trial of three surgical techniques.
        Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2001; 185: 1299-1306
      1. National Institutes of Health State-of-the-Science Conference Statement.
        Obstet Gynecol. 2006; 107: 1386-1397
        • MacLennan A.H.
        • Taylor A.W.
        • Wilson D.H.
        • Wilson D.
        The prevalence of pelvic floor disorders and their relationship to gender, age, parity and mode of delivery.
        Br J Obstet Gynecol. 2000; 107: 1460-1470
        • Gurel H.
        • Gurel S.A.
        Pelvic relaxation and associated risk factors: The results of logistic regression analysis.
        Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 1999; 78: 290-293
        • Swift S.E.
        • Woodman P.
        • O'Boyle A.
        • et al.
        Pelvic Organ Support Study (POSST): The distribution, clinical definition and epidemiology of pelvic organ support defects.
        Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2005; 192: 795-806
        • Grobman W.A.
        • Stamilio D.M.
        Methods of clinical prediction.
        Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2006; 194: 888-894
        • Tu J.V.
        Advantages and disadvantages of using artificial neural networks versus logistic regression for predicting medical outcomes.
        J Clin Epidemiol. 1997; 49: 1225-1231
        • Almeida J.S.
        Predictive non-linear modeling of complex data by artificial neural networks.
        Curr Opin Biotechnol. 2002; 13: 72-76
        • Dreiseitl S.
        • Ohno-Machado L.
        Logistic regression and artificial neural network classification models: A methodology review.
        J Biomed Informatics. 2002; 35: 352-359
        • Basheer I.A.
        • Hajmeer M.
        Artificial neural networks: Fundamentals, computing, design, and application.
        J Microbiol Methods. 2000; 43: 3-31
        • Swift S.E.
        • Pound T.
        • Dias J.K.
        Case-control study of etiologic factors in the development of severe pelvic organ prolapse.
        Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct. 2001; 12: 187-192
        • Bump R.C.
        • Mattiasson A.
        • Bo K.
        • et al.
        The standardization of terminology of female pelvic floor dysfunction.
        Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1996; 175: 10-17
        • Ohlsson M.
        WeAidU—a decision support system for myocardial perfusion images using artificial neural networks.
        Artif Intell Med. 2004; 30: 49-60
        • Mueller M.
        • Wagner C.L.
        • Annibale D.J.
        • Hulsey T.C.
        • Knapp R.G.
        • Almeida J.S.
        Predicting extubation outcome in preterm newborns: A comparison of neural networks with clinical expertise and statistical modeling.
        Pediatr Res. 2004; 56: 11-18