Advertisement

Safety and efficacy of vaginal hysterectomy in the large uterus with the LigaSure bipolar diathermy system

      Objective

      This study was undertaken to assess safety and efficacy of vaginal hysterectomy in case of large uterine size (≥ 250 g) using the LigaSure bipolar diathermy (Valleylab, Boulder, CO).

      Study Design

      In a retrospective study, medical records of 102 patients who underwent vaginal hysterectomy and who had uterine weight (evaluated after surgery) 250 g or greater were reviewed. All hysterectomies were performed by using the LigaSure vessel sealing system to secure vascular pedicles (uterosacral-cardinal, uterine and ovarian and round ligaments).

      Results

      Of the 102 vaginal hysterectomies, 99 were successfully performed (97.1%; 95% confidence interval, 91.6-99.4%), whereas a conversion from the vaginal to the abdominal route was required in 3 cases. The median uterine weight was 455 g (range, 241-1913 g). The weight of the largest uterus successfully removed vaginally was 1600 g, without intraoperative and postoperative complications. The median operative time was 50 minutes (range, 25-50 minutes).

      Conclusion

      The current study confirms that very large uterine volume does not represent a real obstacle to perform vaginal hysterectomy and that results in a safe and effective technique in cases of uterine weight 250 g or greater.

      Key words

      To read this article in full you will need to make a payment

      Purchase one-time access:

      Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online access
      One-time access price info
      • For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
      • For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'

      Subscribe:

      Subscribe to American Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology
      Already a print subscriber? Claim online access
      Already an online subscriber? Sign in
      Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect

      References

        • Richardson R.E.
        • Bournas N.
        • Magos A.L.
        Is laparoscopic hysterectomy a waste of time?.
        Lancet. 1995; 345: 36-41
        • Kovac S.R.
        Hysterectomy outcomes in patients with similar indications.
        Obstet Gynecol. 2000; 95: 787-793
        • Darai E.
        • Soriano D.
        • Kimata P.
        • Laplace C.
        • Lecuru F.
        Vaginal hysterectomy for enlarged uteri, with or without laparoscopic assistance: randomised study.
        Obstet Gynecol. 2001; 97: 712-716
        • Doucette R.C.
        • Sharp H.T.
        • Alder S.C.
        Challenging generally accepted contraindications to vaginal hysterectomy.
        Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2001; 184: 1386-1391
        • Maresh M.J.A.
        • Metcalfe M.A.
        • McPherson K.
        • et al.
        The VALUE national hysterectomy study: description of the patients and their surgery.
        BJOG. 2002; 109: 302-312
        • Farquhar C.M.
        • Steiner C.A.
        Hysterectomy rates in the United States 1990-1997.
        Obstet Gynecol. 2002; 99: 229-234
        • Unger J.B.
        Vaginal hysterectomy for the woman with a moderately enlarged uterus weighing 200 to 700 grams.
        Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1999; 180: 1337-1344
        • Dorsey J.H.
        • Steinberg E.P.
        • Holtz P.M.
        Clinical indications for hysterectomy route: patient characteristics or physicians preference?.
        Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1995; 173: 1452-1460
        • Kovac S.R.
        • Barhan S.
        • Lister M.
        • Tucker L.
        • Bishop H.
        • Das A.
        Guidelines for the selection of the route of hysterectomy: application in resident clinic population.
        Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2002; 187: 1521-1527
        • Kennedy J.S.
        • Stranahan P.L.
        • Taylor K.D.
        • Chandler J.G.
        High-burst strength, feedback-controlled bipolar vessel sealing.
        Surg Endosc. 1998; 12: 876-878
        • Palazzo F.F.
        • Francis D.L.
        • Clifton M.A.
        Randomised clinical trial of Ligasure versus open haemorrhoidectomy.
        Br J Surg. 2002; 89: 154-157
        • Segupta S.
        • Webb D.R.
        Use of a computer-controlled bipolar diathermy system in radical prostatectomies and other open urological surgery.
        Aust N Z J Surg. 2001; 71: 538-540
        • Horgan P.G.
        A novel technique for parenchymal division during hepatectomy.
        Am J Surg. 2001; 181: 236-237
        • Petrakis I.E.
        • Lasithoiotakis K.G.
        • Chalkiadakis G.E.
        Use of the LigaSure vessel sealer in total abdominal hysterectomy.
        Int J Gynecol Obstet. 2005; 89: 303-304
        • Hefni M.A.
        • Bhaumik J.
        • El-Toukhy T.
        • et al.
        Safety and efficacy of using the LigaSure vessel sealing system for securing the pedicles in vaginal hysterectomy: randomised controlled trial.
        BJOG. 2005; 112: 329-333
        • Cronje H.S.
        • deConing E.C.
        Electrosurgical bipolar vessel sealing during vaginal hysterectomy.
        Int J Gynecol Obstet. 2005; 91: 243-245
        • Clave′ H.
        • Baar H.
        • Niccolai P.
        Painless vaginal hysterectomy with thermal hemostasis (results of a series of 152 cases).
        Gynecol Surg. 2005; 2: 101-105
        • Purohit R.K.
        • Pattnaik K.K.
        Vaginal hysterectomy by electrosurgery (an extraperitoneal approach).
        J Obstet Gynecol India. 2001; 51: 162-164
        • Zubke W.
        • Becker S.
        • Wallwiener D.
        Vaginal hysterectomy: a new approach using bicoagulation forceps.
        Gynecol Surg. 2004; 1: 179-182
        • Fleshman J.
        Advanced technology in the management of haemorrhoids: stapling, Laser, harmonic scalpel and ligasure.
        J Gastrointest Surg. 2002; 6: 299-301
        • Pelosi 3rd, M.A.
        • Pelosi M.A.
        Simplified vaginal hysterectomy: a pioneer approach.
        N J Med. 1997; 34: 33-39
        • Deval B.
        • Rafii A.
        • Soriano D.
        • Samain E.
        • Levardon M.
        • Darai E.
        Morbidity of vaginal hysterectomy for benign tumors as a function of uterine weight.
        J Reprod Med. 2003; 48: 435-440
        • Magos A.
        • Bournas N.
        • Sinha R.
        • Richardson R.E.
        • O'Connor H.
        Vaginal hysterectomy for the large uterus.
        BJOG. 1996; 103: 246-251
        • Hwang J.L.
        • Seow K.M.
        • Tsai Y.L.
        • Huang L.W.
        • Hsieh B.C.
        • Lee C.
        Comparative study of vaginal, laparoscopically assisted vaginal and abdominal hysterectomies for uterine myoma larger than 6 cm in diameter or uterus weighing at least 450 g: a prospective randomized study.
        Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2002; 81: 1132-1138
        • Benassi L.
        • Rossi T.
        • Kaihura C.T.
        • et al.
        Abdominal or vaginal hysterectomy for enlarged uteri: a randomized clinical trial.
        Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2002; 187: 1561-1565
        • Taylor S.M.
        • Romero A.A.
        • Kammerer-Doak D.N.
        • Qualls C.
        • Rogers R.G.
        Abdominal hysterectomy for the enlarged myomatous uterus compared with vaginal hysterectomy with morcellation.
        Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2003; 189: 1579-1583
        • Dorsey H.
        • Holtz P.M.
        • Griffiths R.I.
        • McGrath M.M.
        • Steinber E.P.
        Costs and charges associated with three alternative techniques of hysterectomy.
        N Engl J Med. 1996; 335: 476-482
        • Hoffman M.S.
        • DeCesare S.
        • Kalter C.
        Abdominal hysterectomy versus transvaginal morcellation for the removal of enlarged uteri.
        Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1994; 171: 309-315
        • Gitsch G.
        • Berger E.
        • Tatra G.
        Complications of vaginal hysterectomy under “difficult” circumstances.
        Arch Gynecol Obstet. 1991; 249: 209-212
        • Kammerer-Doak D.N.
        • Mao J.
        Vaginal hysterectomy with and without morcellation: the University of New Mexico Hospital's experience.
        Obstet Gynecol. 1996; 88: 560-563
      1. Edwards SD, Peirce SC, Crawford DC. Electrosurgical vessel sealing systems. UK market survey. NHS–Purchasing and Supply Agency–Centre for Evidence-based Purchasing Report 06008. March 2006.