Advertisement

Population trends in cesarean delivery for breech presentation in the United States, 1997-2003

Published:February 25, 2008DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajog.2007.11.059

      Objective

      The objective of the study was to determine whether cesarean delivery for breech has increased in the United States.

      Study Design

      We calculated cesarean rates for term singletons in breech/malpresentation from 1997 to 2003 using National Center for Health Statistics data. We compared rates by sociodemographic groups and state. Multivariable logistic regression models were constructed to see whether factors associated with cesarean delivery differed over time.

      Results

      Breech cesarean rates increased overall from 83.8% to 85.1%. There was a significant increase in rates for most sociodemographic groups. There was little to no increase for mothers younger than 30 years old. There was wide variability in rates by state, 61.6-94.2% in 1997. Higher breech incidence correlated with lower cesarean rates, suggesting potential state bias in reporting breech.

      Conclusion

      In the United States, breech infants are predominantly born by cesarean. There was a small increase in this trend from 1998 to 2002. There is wide variability by state, which is not explained by sociodemographic patterns and may be due to reporting differences.

      Key words

      To read this article in full you will need to make a payment

      Purchase one-time access:

      Academic and Personal
      One-time access price info
      • For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
      • For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'

      Subscribe:

      Subscribe to American Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology
      Already a print subscriber? Claim online access
      Already an online subscriber? Sign in
      Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect

      References

        • Hannah M.E.
        • Hannah W.J.
        • Hewson S.A.
        • Hodnett E.D.
        • Saigal S.
        • Willan A.R.
        Planned caesarean section versus planned vaginal birth for breech presentation at term: A randomised multicentre trial.
        Lancet. 2000; 356: 1375-1383
        • Hannah M.E.
        • Whyte H.
        • Hannah W.J.
        • et al.
        Maternal outcomes at 2 years after planned cesarean section versus planned vaginal birth for breech presentation at term: The international randomized Term Breech Trial.
        Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2004; 191: 917-927
        • Whyte H.
        • Hannah M.E.
        • Saigal S.
        • et al.
        Outcomes of children at 2 years after planned cesarean birth versus planned vaginal birth for breech presentation at term: The International Randomized Term Breech Trial.
        Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2004; 191: 864-871
        • Glezerman M.
        Five years to the term breech trial: the rise and fall of a randomized controlled trial.
        Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2006; 194: 20-25
        • Alexandersson O.
        • Bixo M.
        • Hogberg U.
        Evidence-based changes in term breech delivery practice in Sweden.
        Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2005; 84: 584-587
        • Rietberg C.C.
        • Elferink-Stinkens P.M.
        • Visser G.H.
        The effect of the Term Breech Trial on medical intervention behavior and neonatal outcome in The Netherlands: An analysis of 35,453 Term breech infants.
        Obstet Gynecol Surv. 2005; 60: 289-290
        • ACOG Committee Opinion No. 340
        Mode of term singleton breech delivery.
        Obstet Gynecol. 2006; 108: 235-237
      1. National Center for Health Statistics. 1999 Birth cohort linked birth and infant death data set. Hyattsville (MD): National Center for Health Statistics.

      2. National Center for Health Statistics. 2000 Birth cohort linked birth and infant death data set. Hyattsville (MD): National Center for Health Statistics.

      3. National Center for Health Statistics. 1997 Birth cohort linked birth and infant death data set. Hyattsville (MD): National Center for Health Statistics.

        • National Center for Health Statistics
        1998 Birth cohort linked birth and infant death data set.
        National Center for Health Statistics, Hyattsville (MD)1999
        • National Center for Health Statistics
        2001 Birth cohort linked birth and infant death data set.
        National Center for Health Statistics, Hyattsville (MD)2002
        • National Center for Health Statistics
        2002 Natality public-use tape and CD-ROM.
        National Center for Health Statistics, Hyattsville (MD)2003
        • National Center for Health Statistics
        2003 Natality public-use tape and CD-ROM.
        National Center for Health Statistics, Hyattsville (MD)2002
        • National Center for Health Statistics
        Technical appendix from vital statistics of the United States 1999 natality.
        Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Hyattsville (MD)2001
        • National Center for Health Statistics
        Technical appendix from vital statistics of the United States 1997 natality.
        Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Hyattsville (MD)1999
        • National Center for Health Statistics
        Technical appendix from vital statistics of the United States 1998 natality.
        Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Hyattsville (MD)2000
        • Kessner D.M.
        • Singer J.
        • Kalk C.E.
        • Schlesinger E.R.
        Infant death: An analysis by maternal risk and health care.
        Institute of Medicine, National Academy of Sciences, Washington (DC)1973
      4. National Center for Health Statistics. Technical appendix from vital statistics of the United States 2000 natality. Hyattsville (MD): Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.

      5. National Center for Health Statistics. Technical appendix from vital statistics of the United States 2001 natality. Hyattsville (MD): Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.

      6. National Center for Health Statistics. Technical appendix from vital statistics of the United States 2002 Natality. Hyattsville (MD): Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.

      7. National Center for Health Statistics. Documentation of the detail natality public use file for 2003. Hyattsville (MD): Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.

      8. ACOG Committee Opinion: Number 265, December 2001.
        Obstet Gynecol. 2001; 98: 1189-1190
        • Lindenauer P.K.
        • Remus D.
        • Roman S.
        • et al.
        Public reporting and pay for performance in hospital quality improvement.
        N Engl J Med. 2007; 356: 486-496
        • Kontopoulos E.V.
        • Ananth C.V.
        • Smulian J.C.
        • Vintzileos A.M.
        The impact of route of delivery and presentation on twin neonatal and infant mortality: a population-based study in the USA, 1995-97.
        J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2004; 15: 219-224
        • Lee H.C.
        • El-Sayed Y.Y.
        • Gould J.B.
        Delivery mode by race for breech presentation in the US.
        J Perinatol. 2007; 27: 147-153
        • Lee K.S.
        • Khoshnood B.
        • Sriram S.
        • Hsieh H.L.
        • Singh J.
        • Mittendorf R.
        Relationship of cesarean delivery to lower birth weight-specific neonatal mortality in singleton breech infants in the United States.
        Obstet Gynecol. 1998; 92: 769-774
        • Muhuri P.K.
        • Macdorman M.F.
        • Menacker F.
        Method of delivery and neonatal mortality among very low birth weight infants in the United States.
        Matern Child Health J. 2006; 10: 47-53
      9. National Center for Health Statistics. Guide to completing the facility worksheets for the certificate of live birth and report of fetal death (2003 revision). Hyattsville (MD): Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.

        • Bewley S.
        • Shennan A.
        Peer review and the Term Breech Trial.
        Lancet. 2007; 369: 906