Advertisement

The myths of laparoscopic surgery

      Abstract

      Laparoscopic surgery has been rapidly accepted without rigorous scientific study. New procedures and technologies have advanced rapidly, and most gynecologists have embraced these techniques. I believe that the new technology has given rise to the following myths: (1) that there are associated cost savings, (2) that new technology is always better than the old, (3) that a steep learning curve is acceptable, (4) that market share will be lost without the new techniques, (5) that oncologic surgery is not different when performed laparoscopically, (6) that operations are the same with the laparoscope, and (7) that every gynecologist can do these procedures. A critical evaluation of new technology and of laparoscopic techniques needs to be performed. (Am J Obstet Gynecol 2000;183:1-5.)

      Keywords

      To read this article in full you will need to make a payment

      Purchase one-time access:

      Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online access
      One-time access price info
      • For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
      • For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'

      Subscribe:

      Subscribe to American Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology
      Already a print subscriber? Claim online access
      Already an online subscriber? Sign in
      Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect

      References

        • Summit Jr, RL
        • Stovall TG
        • Steege JF
        • Lipscomb GH
        A multicenter randomized comparison of laparoscopically assisted vaginal hysterectomy and abdominal hysterectomy in abdominal hysterectomy candidates.
        Obstet Gynecol. 1998; 92: 321-331
        • Sultana CJ
        • Sogor L
        Laparoscopy vs. laparotomy for gynecologic procedures: impact on resident training.
        J Reprod Med. 1996; 41: 225-230
        • Dorsey JH
        • Holtz PM
        • Griffiths RI
        • McGrath MM
        • Steinberg EP
        Costs and charges associated with three alternative techniques of hysterectomy [see comments] [published erratum appears in N Engl J Med 1997;336:147].
        N Engl J Med. 1996; 335: 476-482
        • Tsaltas J
        • Magnus A
        • Mamers PM
        • Lawrence AS
        • Lolatgis N
        • Healy DL
        Laparoscopic and abdominal hysterectomy: a cost comparison.
        Med J Aust. 1997; 166: 205-207
        • Kohli N
        • Jacobs PA
        • Sze EH
        • Roat TW
        • Karram MM
        Open compared with laparoscopic approach to Burch colposuspension: a cost analysis.
        Obstet Gynecol. 1997; 90: 411-415
        • Liu CY
        Laparoscopic hysterectomy: a review of 72 cases.
        J Reprod Med. 1992; 37: 351-354
        • Johns DA
        • Carrera B
        • Jones J
        • DeLeon F
        • Vincent R
        • Safely C
        The medical and economic impact of laparoscopically assisted vaginal hysterectomy in a large, metropolitan, not-for-profit hospital.
        Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1995; 172: 1709-1715
        • Härkki-Sirén P
        • Sjöberg J
        • Tiitinen A
        Urinary tract injuries after hysterectomy.
        Obstet Gynecol. 1998; 92: 113-118
        • Childers JM
        • Nasseri A
        • Surwit EA
        Laparoscopic management of suspicious adnexal masses.
        Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1996; 175: 1451-1457
        • Stadulis LH
        • Rom CD
        • Powell JL
        Complications of laparoscopically assisted vaginal hysterectomy.
        J Gynecol Tech. 1999; 5: 119-123
        • Childers JM
        • Aqua KA
        • Surwit EA
        • Hallum AV
        • Hatch KD
        Abdominal-wall tumor implantation after laparoscopy for malignant conditions.
        Obstet Gynecol. 1994; 84: 765-769
        • Nduka C
        • Monson J
        • Menzies-Gow N
        • Darzi A
        Abdominal wall metastases following laparoscopy.
        Br J Surg. 1994; 81: 648-652
        • Shepherd J
        • Carter P
        • Lowe D
        Wound recurrence by implantation of a borderline ovarian tumor following laparoscopic removal.
        Br J Obstet Gynaecol. 1994; 101: 265-266
        • Gleeson NC
        • Nicosia SV
        • Mark JE
        • Hoffman MS
        • Cavanagh D
        Abdominal wall metastases from ovarian cancer after laparoscopy.
        Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1993; 169: 522-523
        • Wang PH
        • Yen MS
        • Yuan CC
        • Chao KC
        • Ng HT
        Port site metastasis after laparoscopic-assisted vaginal hysterectomy for endometrial cancer: possible mechanisms and prevention.
        Gynecol Oncol. 1997; 66: 151-155
        • Muntz Hg
        • Goff BA
        • Madsen BL
        • Yon JL
        Port site recurrence after laparoscopic surgery for endometrial carcinoma.
        Obstet Gynecol. 1999; 93: 807-809
        • Faught W
        • Fung M
        Port site recurrences following laparoscopically managed early stage endometrial cancer.
        Int J Gynecol Cancer. 1999; 9: 256-258
        • Naumann RW
        • Spencer S
        An umbilical metastasis after laparoscopy for squamous cell carcinoma of the cervix.
        Gynecol Oncol. 1997; 64: 507-509
        • Wang PH
        • Yuan CC
        • Chao KC
        • Yen MS
        • Ng HT
        • Chao HT
        Squamous cell carcinoma of the cervix after laparoscopic surgery.
        J Reprod Med. 1997; 42: 801-804
        • Lane G
        • Tay J
        Port site metastasis following laparoscopic lymphadenectomy for adenosquamous carcinoma of the cervix.
        Gynecol Oncol. 1999; 74: 130-133
        • Hopkins MP
        • von Gruenigen V
        • Gaich S
        Laparoscopic port site implantation with ovarian cancer.
        Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2000; 182: 735-736
        • Hopkins MP
        • Dulai RM
        • Occhino A
        • Holda S
        The effects of carbon dioxide pneumoperitoneum on seeding of tumor in port sites in a rat model.
        Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1999; 181: 1329-1334
        • Lehner R
        • Wenzl R
        • Heinzl H
        • Husslein P
        • Sevelda P
        Influence of delayed staging laparotomy after laparoscopic removal of ovarian masses later found to be malignant.
        Obstet Gynecol. 1998; 92: 967-971
        • Kindermann G
        • Maassen V
        • Kuhn W
        Laparoscopic management of ovarian tumors subsequently diagnosed as malignant.
        J Pelvic Surg. 1996; 2: 245-251
        • Pelosi 3rd, MA
        • Pelosi MA
        Vaginal hysterectomy for benign uterine disease in the laparoscopically confirmed frozen pelvis.
        J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A. 1997; 7: 345-351
        • Maher P
        • Wood C
        • Hill D
        Excision of endometriosis in the pouch of Douglas by combined laparovaginal surgery using the Maher abdominal elevator.
        J Am Assoc Gynecol Laparosc. 1995; 2: 199-202