A multicenter controlled trial of fetal pulse oximetry in the intrapartum management of nonreassuring fetal heart rate patterns


      Objective: Recent developments permit the use of pulse oximetry to evaluate fetal oxygenation in labor. We tested the hypothesis that the addition of fetal pulse oximetry in the evaluation of abnormal fetal heart rate patterns in labor improves the accuracy of fetal assessment and allows safe reduction of cesarean deliveries performed because of nonreassuring fetal status. Study Design: A randomized, controlled trial was conducted concurrently in 9 centers. The patients had term pregnancies and were in active labor when abnormal fetal heart rate patterns developed. The patients were randomized to electronic fetal heart rate monitoring alone (control group) or to the combination of electronic fetal monitoring and continuous fetal pulse oximetry (study group). The primary outcome was a reduction in cesarean deliveries for nonreassuring fetal status as a measure of improved accuracy of assessment of fetal oxygenation. Results: A total of 1010 patients were randomized, 502 to the control group and 508 to the study group. There was a reduction of >50% in the number of cesarean deliveries performed because of nonreassuring fetal status in the study group (study, 4.5%; vs control, 10.2%; P =.007). However, there was no net difference in overall cesarean delivery rates (study, n = 147 [29%]; vs control, 130 [26%]; P =.49) because of an increase in cesarean deliveries performed because of dystocia in the study group. In a blinded partogram analysis 89% of the study patients and 91% of the control patients who had a cesarean delivery because of dystocia met defined criteria for actual dystocia. There was no difference between the 2 groups in adverse maternal or neonatal outcomes. In terms of the operative intervention for nonreassuring fetal status, there was an improvement in both the sensitivity and the specificity for the study group compared with the control group for the end points of metabolic acidosis and need for resuscitation. Conclusion: The study confirmed its primary hypothesis of a safe reduction in cesarean deliveries performed because of nonreassuring fetal status. However, the addition of fetal pulse oximetry did not result in an overall reduction in cesarean deliveries. The increase in cesarean deliveries because of dystocia in the study group did appear to result from a well-documented arrest of labor. Fetal pulse oximetry improved the obstetrician’s ability to more appropriately intervene by cesarean or operative vaginal delivery for fetuses who were actually depressed and acidotic. The unexpected increase in operative delivery for dystocia in the study group is of concern and remains to be explained. (Am J Obstet Gynecol 2000;183:1049-58.)


      To read this article in full you will need to make a payment

      Purchase one-time access:

      Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online access
      One-time access price info
      • For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
      • For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'


      Subscribe to American Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology
      Already a print subscriber? Claim online access
      Already an online subscriber? Sign in
      Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect


        • Haverkamp AD
        • Thompson HE
        • McFee JG
        • et al.
        The evaluation of continuous fetal heart rate monitoring in high-risk pregnancy.
        Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1976; 125: 310-317
        • MacDonald D
        • Grant A
        • Sheridan-Pereira M
        • et al.
        The Dublin randomized control trial of intrapartum fetal heart rate monitoring.
        Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1985; 152: 524-539
        • Leveno KJ
        • Cunningham FG
        • Nelson S
        • et al.
        A prospective comparison of selective and universal electronic fetal monitoring in 34,995 pregnancies.
        N Engl J Med. 1986; 315: 615-619
        • Renou P
        • Chang A
        • Anderson I
        • et al.
        Controlled trials of fetal intensive care.
        Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1976; 126: 470-476
        • Kelso IM
        • Parsons RJ
        • Lawrence GF
        • et al.
        An assessment of continuous fetal heart rate monitoring in labor; a randomized trial.
        Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1978; 131: 526-532
        • Johnson N.
        Development and potential of fetal pulse oximetry.
        Contemp Rev Obstet Gynecol. 1991; 3: 193-200
        • Mannheimer PD
        • Fein ME
        • Casciani JR.
        Physio-optical considerations for the design of fetal pulse oximetry sensors.
        Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 1997; 1: S9-S19
        • Mannheimer PD
        • Casciani JR
        • Fein ME.
        Wavelength selection for fetal pulse oximetry selection.
        IEEE Trans Biomed Eng. 1997; 44: 148-158
        • Dildy GA
        • Clark SL
        • Loucks CA.
        Intrapartum fetal pulse oximetry: past, present, and future.
        Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1996; 175: 1-9
        • McNamara H
        • Chung DC
        • Lilford R
        • et al.
        Do fetal pulse oximetry readings at delivery correlate with cord blood oxygenation and acidaemia?.
        Br J Obstet Gynaecol. 1999; 99: 735-738
        • Dildy GA
        • van den Berg PP
        • Katz M
        • et al.
        Intrapartum fetal pulse oximetry: fetal oxygen saturation trends during labor and relation to delivery outcome.
        Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1994; 171: 679-684
        • Kuhnert M
        • Seelbach-Gobel B
        • Butterwegge M.
        Predictive agreement between the fetal arterial oxygen saturation and fetal scalp pH: results of the German multicenter study.
        Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1998; 178: 330-335
        • Seelbach-Gobel M
        • Huepel M
        • Kuhned M
        • et al.
        The prediction of fetal acidosis by means of intrapartum fetal pulse oximetry.
        Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1999; 180: 73-81
        • Carbonne B
        • Langer B
        • Goffinet F
        • et al.
        Multicenter study on the clinical value of fetal pulse oximetry. II. Compared predictive values of pulse oximetry and fetal blood analysis.
        Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1997; 17: 593-598
        • Kubli FW
        • Hon EH
        • Kazin AE
        • et al.
        Observations on heart rate and pH in the human fetus during labor.
        Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1969; 104: 1190-1206
        • Schifrin BS
        • Dame L.
        Fetal heart rate patterns. Prediction of Apgar score.
        JAMA. 1972; 219: 1322-1325
        • Bissonnette JM.
        Relationship between continuous FHR patterns and Apgar score in the newborn.
        Br J Obstet Gynaecol. 1975; 82: 24-28
        • Haverkamp AD
        • Orleans M
        • Langendoerfer S
        • et al.
        A controlled trial of the differential effects of continuous fetal heart rate monitoring in labor: a randomized trial.
        Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1979; 134: 399-412