Advertisement

Knowledge of contraceptive effectiveness

Published:April 09, 2012DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajog.2012.04.012

      Objective

      The purpose of this study was to determine women's knowledge of contraceptive effectiveness.

      Study Design

      We performed a cross-sectional analysis of a contraceptive knowledge questionnaire that had been completed by 4144 women who were enrolled in the Contraceptive CHOICE Project before they received comprehensive contraceptive counseling and chose their method. For each contraceptive method, women were asked “what percentage would get pregnant in a year: <1%, 1-5%, 6-10%, >10%, don't know.”

      Results

      Overall, 86% of subjects knew that the annual risk of pregnancy is >10% if no contraception is used. More than 45% of women overestimate the effectiveness of depo-medroxyprogesterone acetate, pills, the patch, the ring, and condoms. After adjustment for age, education, and contraceptive history, the data showed that women who chose the intrauterine device (adjusted relative risk, 6.9; 95% confidence interval, 5.6–8.5) or implant (adjusted relative risk, 5.9; 95% confidence interval, 4.7–7.3) were significantly more likely to identify the effectiveness of their method accurately compared with women who chose either the pill, patch, or ring.

      Conclusion

      This cohort demonstrated significant knowledge gaps regarding contraceptive effectiveness and over-estimated the effectiveness of pills, the patch, the ring, depo-medroxyprogesterone acetate, and condoms.

      Key words

      To read this article in full you will need to make a payment

      Purchase one-time access:

      Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online access
      One-time access price info
      • For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
      • For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'

      Subscribe:

      Subscribe to American Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology
      Already a print subscriber? Claim online access
      Already an online subscriber? Sign in
      Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect

      References

        • Forrest J.D.
        US women's perceptions of and attitudes about the IUD.
        Obstet Gynecol Surv. 1996; 51: S30-S34
        • Stanwood N.L.
        • Bradley K.A.
        Young pregnant women's knowledge of modern intrauterine devices.
        Obstet Gynecol. 2006; 108: 1417-1422
        • Lopez L.M.
        • Steiner M.J.
        • Grimes D.A.
        • Schulz K.F.
        Strategies for communicating contraceptive effectiveness.
        Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2008; : CD006964
        • Hladky K.J.
        • Allsworth J.E.
        • Madden T.
        • Secura G.M.
        • Peipert J.F.
        Women's knowledge about intrauterine contraception.
        Obstet Gynecol. 2011; 117: 48-54
        • Delbanco S.
        • Lundy J.
        • Hoff T.
        • Parker M.
        • Smith M.D.
        Public knowledge and perceptions about unplanned pregnancy and contraception in three countries.
        Fam Plann Perspect. 1997; 29: 70-75
        • Muula A.S.
        Trends in contraceptive knowledge and use among adolescent married women in Malawi.
        Croat Med J. 2008; 49: 561-563
        • Mosher W.D.
        • Jones J.
        Use of contraception in the United States: 1982-2008: National Center for Health Statistics.
        Vital Health Stat. 2010; 29: 1-44
        • Finer L.B.
        • Henshaw S.K.
        Disparities in rates of unintended pregnancy in the United States, 1994 and 2001.
        Perspect Sex Reprod Health. 2006; 38: 90-96
        • Kavanaugh M.L.
        • Jerman J.
        • Hubacher D.
        • Kost K.
        • Finer L.B.
        Characteristics of women in the United States who use long-acting reversible contraceptive methods.
        Obstet Gynecol. 2011; 117: 1349-1357
        • Peipert J.F.
        • Zhao Q.
        • Allsworth J.E.
        • et al.
        Continuation and satisfaction of reversible contraception.
        Obstet Gynecol. 2011; 117: 1105-1113
        • Secura G.M.
        • Allsworth J.E.
        • Madden T.
        • Mullersman J.L.
        • Peipert J.F.
        The Contraceptive CHOICE Project: reducing barriers to long-acting reversible contraception.
        Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2010; 203: 115.e1-115.e7
        • Trussell J.
        Contraceptive failure in the United States.
        Contraception. 2011; 83: 397-404
        • Henshaw S.K.
        Unintended pregnancy and abortion in the USA: epidemiology and public health impact.
        in: Paul M. Lichtenberg E.S. Borgatta L. Grimes D.A. Stubblefield P.G. Creinin M.D. Management of unintended and abnormal pregnancy: comprehensive abortion care. Wiley-Blackwell, Oxford2009: 24-35 (Chapter 3)
        • Moos M.K.
        • Bartholomew N.E.
        • Lohr K.N.
        Counseling in the clinical setting to prevent unintended pregnancy: an evidence-based research agenda.
        Contraception. 2003; 67: 115-132
        • Harper C.C.
        • Brown B.A.
        • Foster-Rosales A.
        • Raine T.R.
        Hormonal contraceptive method choice among young, low-income women: how important is the provider?.
        Patient Educ Couns. 2010; 81: 349-354
        • Lee J.K.
        • Parisi S.M.
        • Akers A.Y.
        • Borrerro S.
        • Schwarz E.B.
        The impact of contraceptive counseling in primary care on contraceptive use.
        J Gen Intern Med. 2011; 26: 731-736
        • Sufrin C.B.
        • Ross J.S.
        Pharmaceutical industry marketing: understanding its impact on women's health.
        Obstet Gynecol Surv. 2008; 63: 585-596
        • Steiner M.J.
        • Trussell J.
        • Mehta N.
        • Condon S.
        • Subramaniam S.
        • Bourne D.
        Communicating contraceptive effectiveness: a randomized controlled trial to inform a World Health Organization family planning handbook.
        Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2006; 195: 85-91
        • Steiner M.J.
        • Trussell J.
        • Johnson S.
        Communicating contraceptive effectiveness: an updated counseling chart.
        Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2007; 197: 118
      1. Kittur ND, Secura GM, Peipert JF, Madden T, Finer LB, Allsworth JE. Comparison of contraceptive use between the Contraceptive CHOICE Project and state and national data. Contraception; 83:479-85.

        • Guttmacher I.
        Fulfilling the promise: public policy and US family planning clinics.
        The Alan Guttmacher Institute (AGI), The Alan Guttmacher Institute New York2000
        • American College of Obstetrics and Gynecology
        ACOG committee opinion no. 450: increasing use of contraceptive implants and intrauterine devices to reduce unintended pregnancy.
        Obstet Gynecol. 2009; 114: 1434-1438