Review Education| Volume 205, ISSUE 3, P171-176, September 2011

To the point: medical education reviews—ongoing call for faculty development

Published:March 07, 2011DOI:
      This article in the To the Point series will focus on best practices regarding faculty development in medical education in the field of obstetrics and gynecology. Faculty development is an essential component in achieving teacher and learner satisfaction as well as improving learner outcomes. The Liaison Committee on Medical Education requires medical school faculty to have the capability and longitudinal commitment to be effective teachers. Although many programs have been created to address faculty development, there remains a paucity of literature documenting the impact of these programs on learner outcomes. We reviewed the qualities of an excellent medical educator, expectations regarding medical school teaching faculty, elements of comprehensive faculty development programs, and outcome measures for evaluating the effectiveness of these programs.

      Key words

      To read this article in full you will need to make a payment

      Purchase one-time access:

      Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online access
      One-time access price info
      • For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
      • For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'


      Subscribe to American Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology
      Already a print subscriber? Claim online access
      Already an online subscriber? Sign in
      Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect


        • Wilkerson L.
        • Irby D.M.
        Strategies for improving teaching practices: a comprehensive approach to faculty development.
        Acad Med. 1998; 73: 387-396
        • Hewson M.G.
        • Copeland H.L.
        • Fishleder A.J.
        “What's the use of faculty development? Program evaluation using retrospective self-assessments and independent performance ratings.”.
        Teach Learn Med. 2001; 13: 153-160
        • Steinert Y.
        • Mann K.
        • Naismith L.
        • Chin K.
        • et al.
        A systematic review of faculty development initiatives designed to improve teaching effectiveness in medical education: BEME guide no. 8.
        Med Teach. 2006; 28: 497-526
        • Duvivier R.J.
        • Van Dalen J.
        • Van Der Vleuten C.P.M.
        • Scherpbier J.J.A.
        Teacher perceptions of desired qualities, competencies and strategies for clinical skills teachers.
        Med Teach. 2009; 31: 634-641
        • Thurgur L.
        • Bandiera G.
        • Lee S.
        • Tiberius R.
        What do emergency medicine learners want from their teachers?.
        Acad Emerg Med. 2005; 12: 856-861
        • McLean M.
        Qualities attributed to an ideal educator by medical students: should faculty take cognizance?.
        Med Teach. 2001; 23: 367-370
        • Chandran L.
        • Gusic M.
        • Baldwin C.
        • et al.
        Evaluating the performance of medical educators: a novel analysis tool to demonstrate the quality and impact of educational activities.
        Acad Med. 2009; 84: 58-66
        • Gusic M.E.
        • Chandran L.
        • Balmer D.F.
        • D'Alessandro D.M.
        • Baldwin C.D.
        Educator portfolio template of the Pediatric Academic Societies' Educational Scholars Program.
        (Accessed July 15, 2009)
        • Simpson D.
        • Fincher R.E.
        • Hafler J.P.
        • et al.
        Advancing educators and education by defining the components and evidence associated with educational scholarship.
        Med Educ. 2007; 41: 1002-1009
        • LCME
        Accreditation Standards: Faculty Standard-4.
        (Last updated June 2008) (Accessed July 16, 2009)
        • AAMC Graduation Questionnaire 2009
        (Accessed Dec. 17, 2009)
        • Hunt J.
        • Stubbe D.E.
        • Hanson M.
        • et al.
        A 2-year progress report of the AACAP-Harvard Macy Teaching Scholars Program.
        Acad Psychiatry. 2008; 32: 414-419
        • AAMC
        Medical school based faculty development and leadership programs.
        (Accessed Oct. 15, 2010)
        • Alliance for Clinical Education
        Guidebook for clerkship directors: Chapter 8: faculty development.
        (Accessed July 15, 2009)
        • APGO Faculty Development website
        Faculty Development Seminar and CREOG and APGO Annual Meeting.
        (Accessed Feb. 13, 2011)
        • Albert Einstein College of Medicine of Yeshiva University
        Teaching excellence.
        (Accessed June 12, 2009)
        • Johns Hopkins Medicine
        Faculty Development.
        (Accessed June 15, 2009)
        • University of North Carolina School of Medicine
        The expert preceptor interactive curriculum.
        (Accessed Oct. 15, 2010)
        • University of Rochester Medical Center
        Faculty development workshops.
        (Accessed Oct. 15, 2010)
        • University of San Francisco School of Medicine
        Key educational skills series and special topics.
        (Accessed June 12, 2009)
        • Irby D.M.
        • Cooke M.
        • Lowenstein D.
        • Richards B.
        The academy movement: a structural approach to reinvigorating the educational mission.
        Acad Med. 2004; 79: 729-736
        • Rider E.A.
        • Cooke M.
        • Lowenstein D.
        The Academies Collaborative: sharing a new model for medical education.
        Acad Med. 2002; 77: 455-462
        • Reid A.
        • Stritter F.T.
        • Ardt J.E.
        Assessment of faculty development program outcomes.
        Fam Med. 1997; 29: 242-247
        • Litzelman D.K.
        • Shea J.A.
        • Kogan J.R.
        • Wales P.S.
        Evaluation of the clerkship: Clinical teachers and program.
        in: Fincher R.E. Ace guidebook for clerkship directors Chapter 7. Alliance for Clinical Educators, Omaha, NE2005
        • Schweitzer L.
        • Eells T.D.
        Post-tenure review at the University of Louisville School of Medicine: a faculty development and revitalization tool.
        Acad Med. 2007; 82: 713-777
        • Elliot D.L.
        • Skeff K.M.
        • Stratos G.A.
        “How Do You Get to the Improvement of Teaching?”.
        Teach Learn Med. 1999; 11: 52-57
        • Katz N.T.
        • McCarty-Gillespie L.
        • Magrane D.M.
        Direct observation as a tool for needs assessment of resident teaching skills in the ambulatory setting.
        Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2003; 189: 684-687
        • Branch W.T.
        • Frankel R.
        • Gracey C.F.
        • et al.
        A good clinician and a caring person: longitudinal faculty development and the enhancement of the human dimensions of care.
        Acad Med. 2009; 84: 117-125
        • Mandel L.P.
        • Stenchever M.A.
        • Vontver L.A.
        A model clinical faculty workshop program for a multisite clerkship.
        Obstet Gynecol. 1997; 90: 1011-1014
        • Johnasson J.
        • Skeff K.
        • Stratos G.
        Clinical teaching improvement: the transportability of the Stanford Faculty Development Program.
        Med Teach. 2009; 31: e377-e382
        • Barzansky B.
        • Kenagy G.
        The full-time clinical faculty: what goes around, comes around.
        Acad Med. 2010; 85: 260-265
        • Flexner A.
        Medical education in the United States and Canada: a report to the Carnegie Foundation for the advancement of teaching.
        Updyke, Boston, MA1910
        • Metheny W.P.
        • Ernest J.M.
        • Bachicha J.
        • et al.
        Have we met the educational challenges of obstetrics and gynecology?.
        Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2002; 187: 1405-1412