Advertisement

Distance from an intrauterine hydrophone as a factor affecting intrauterine sound pressure levels produced by the vibroacoustic stimulation test

      This paper is only available as a PDF. To read, Please Download here.

      Abstract

      OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to determine whether intrauterine sound pressure levels produced by vibroacoustic stimulation were associated with distance from an intrauterine hydrophone in human parturients and to evaluate the effects of distance on the spectrum of the stimulus.
      STUDY DESIGN: Measurements of intrauterine sound were taken in eight volunteer parturients in normal active-phase labor by use of an intrauterine hydrophone. Vibroacoustic stimulation was performed on the maternal abdomen directly overlying the hydrophone; at distances of 5, 10, 15, 20, and 25 cm from the hydrophone; and at the maternal sternum. Intrauterine sound pressure levels were tape-recorded for later analysis. Fetal heart rate and fetal movement were assessed with each vibroacoustic stimulation. Spectral anlyses were performed by taking the fast Fourier transform of the tape-recorded stimulation at each position.
      RESULTS: Analysis of variance with repeated measures indicated at a statiscally significant decrease (F = 4.1, p = 0.004) in the sound pressure levels as distance increased. Spectral analysis indicated large variability between and within subjects.
      CONCLUSION: Sound exposure of the fetal ear is on average decreased as the distance between the ear and the vibroacoustic stimulation is increased. The spectrum of the stimulus produced with vibroacoustic stimulation is highly variable.

      Keywords

      To read this article in full you will need to make a payment

      Purchase one-time access:

      Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online access
      One-time access price info
      • For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
      • For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'

      Subscribe:

      Subscribe to American Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology
      Already a print subscriber? Claim online access
      Already an online subscriber? Sign in
      Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect

      References

        • Read JA
        • Miller FC
        Fetal heart rate acceleration in response to acoustic stimulation as a measure of fetal wellbeing.
        Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1977; 129: 512-515
        • Smith CV
        • Phelan JP
        • Platt LD
        • Broussard P
        • Paul RH
        Fetal acoustic stimulation testing, II: a randomized clinical comparison with the nonstress test.
        Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1986; 155: 131-134
        • Richards DS
        The fetal vibroacoustic stimulation test: an update.
        Semin Perinatol. 1990; 14: 305-310
        • Arulkumaran S
        • Skurr B
        • Tong H
        • Kek LP
        • Yeoh KH
        • Ratnam SS
        No evidence of hearing loss due to fetal acoustic stimulation test.
        Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1991; 78: 283-285
        • Nyman M
        • Barr M
        • Westgren M
        A four-year follow-up of hearing and development in children exposed in utero to vibro-acoustic stimulation.
        Br J Obstet Gynaecol. 1992; 99: 685-688
        • Yost WA
        • Nielsen DW
        Fundamentals of hearing.
        in: Holt Rinehart and Winston, New York1977: 21
        • Gerhardt KJ
        • Abrams RM
        • Blaise MK
        • Gomez KJ
        • Conlon M
        Intrauterine noise levels produced in pregnant ewers by sound applied to the abdomen.
        Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1988; 159: 228-232
        • Nyman M
        • Arulkumaran S
        • Hsu TS
        • Ratnam SS
        • Till O
        • Westgren M
        Vibroacoustic stimulation and intrauterine sound pressure levels.
        Obstet Gynecol. 1991; 78: 803-806
        • Gagnon R
        • Benzaquen S
        • Hunse C
        The fetal sound environment during vibroacoustic stimulation in labor: effect on fetal heart rate response.
        Obstet Gynecol. 1992; 79: 950-955
        • Phelan JP
        • Smith CV
        • Broussard P
        • Small M
        Amniotic fluid volume assessment using the four quadrant technique in the pregnancy between 36 and 42 weeks' gestation.
        J Reprod Med. 1987; 32: 540-542
        • Smith CV
        • Davis SR
        • Rayburn WF
        • Nelson RM
        Fetal habituation to vibroacoustic stimulation in uncomplicated term pregnancies.
        Am J Perinatol. 1991; 8: 380-382
        • Lord HW
        • Gatley WS
        • Evensen HA
        Noise control for engineers.
        in: McGraw-Hill, New York1980: 74
        • Richard DS
        • Abrams RM
        • Gerhardt KJ
        • McCann ME
        Effects of vibration frequency and tissue thickness on intrauterine sound levels in sheep.
        Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1991; 165: 438-442
        • Smith CV
        • Satt B
        • Phelan JB
        • Paul RH
        Intrauterine sound levels: intrapartum assessment with an intrauterine microphone.
        Am J Perinatol. 1990; 7: 312-315
        • Benzaquen S
        • Gagnon R
        • Hunse C
        • Foreman J
        The intrauterine sound environment of the human fetus during labor.
        Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1990; 163: 484-490
        • Richards DS
        • Frentzen B
        • Gerhardt KJ
        • McCann ME
        • Abrams RM
        Sounds levels in the human uterus.
        Obstet Gynecol. 1992; 80: 186-190
        • Eller DP
        • Robinson LJ
        • Newman RB
        Position of the vibroacoustic stimulator does not affect fetal response.
        Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1992; 167: 1137-1139