Advertisement

Efficacy of mathematical methods for ultrasound examinations in diabetic pregnancies

      This paper is only available as a PDF. To read, Please Download here.

      Abstract

      The efficacy of a new principle for evaluation of fetal growth has been compared to standard methods in a population of pregnant diabetic women. Methods for projecting fetal weight at birth and determining the deviation of growth from an expected fetal weight increase based on our growth model provided significant information for the detection of fetal growth abnormalities 3 weeks (mean) before delivery. (Large for gestational age: sensitivity, 81%; specificity, 85%. Small for gestational age: sensitivity, 100%; specificity, 98%.) With the exception of two models for estimation of fetal weight based on ultrasound measurements of the fetal head and abdomen only, none of the standard methods gave results that were significantly better than the use of the biparietal diameter against a population standard. The new methods are expected to provide valuable information for the treatment of fetal growth disorders.

      Keywords

      To read this article in full you will need to make a payment

      Purchase one-time access:

      Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online access
      One-time access price info
      • For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
      • For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'

      Subscribe:

      Subscribe to American Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology
      Already a print subscriber? Claim online access
      Already an online subscriber? Sign in
      Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect

      References

        • Mølsted-Pedersen L
        Obstetrical management and perinatal mortality in diabetic pregnancy.
        in: Rooth G Bratteby L-E Perinatal medicine. Almqvist & Wiksell, Stockholm1976: 98-102
      1. 2d ed. Yearbook of Nordic statistics 1980. vol 19. Nordic Council and the Nordic Statistical Secretariat, Stockholm1981: 56
        • Brenner WE
        • Edelman DA
        • Hendricks CH
        A standard of fetal growth for the United States of America.
        Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1976; 126: 555-563
        • Pedersen J
        • Mølsted-Pedersen L
        Prognosis of the outcome of pregnancies in diabetics: a new classification.
        Acta Endocrinologica. 1965; 50: 70-78
        • Rossavik IK
        • Deter RL
        Mathematical modeling of fetal growth. II. Head cube (A), abdominal cube (B) and their ratio (A/B).
        J Clin Ultrasound. 1984; 12: 535-545
        • Elliott JP
        • Garite TJ
        • Freeman RK
        • McQuown DS
        • Patel JM
        Ultrasonic prediction of fetal macrosomia in diabetic patients.
        Obstet Gynecol. 1982; 60: 159-162
        • Hadlock FP
        • Harrist RP
        • Fearneyhough TC
        • Deter RL
        • Park SK
        • Rossavik IK
        Use of femur length/abdominal circumference ratio in detecting the macrosomic fetus.
        Radiology. 1985; 154: 503-505
        • Bracero LA
        • Baxi LV
        • Rey HR
        • Ming-Neng Y
        Use of ultrasound in antenatal diagnosis of large-for-date gestational age infants in diabetic gravid patients.
        Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1985; 152: 43-47
        • Hadlock FP
        • Deter RL
        • Harrist RB
        • Park SK
        Fetal biparietal diameter: a critical re-evaluation of the relation to menstrual age by means of real-time ultrasound.
        J Ultrasound Med. 1982; 1: 97-104
        • Hadlock FP
        • Harrist RB
        • Carpenter RJ
        • Deter RL
        • Park SK
        Sonographic estimation of fetal weight.
        Radiology. 1984; 150: 535-540
        • Rossavik IK
        Patterns and principles of fetal growth.
        in: 2d ed. Thesis. University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway1982: 189
        • Shepard MJ
        • Richards WA
        • Berkowtiz RL
        • Warsof SL
        • Hobbins JC
        An evaluation of two equations for predicting fetal weight by ultrasound.
        Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1982; 142: 47-54
        • Warsof SL
        • Gohari P
        • Berkowitz RL
        • Hobbins JC
        The estimation of fetal weight by computer-assisted analysis.
        Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1977; 128: 881-892
      2. Deter RL, Rossavik IK, Harrist RB, Hadlock FP. Mathematical modeling of fetal growth. III. Development of individual growth curve standards. Obstet Gynecol (in press).

        • Jervell J
        • Moe N
        • Skjaeraasen J
        • Blystad W
        • Egge K
        Diabetes mellitus and pregnancy—management and results at Rikshospitalet, Oslo, 1970–1977.
        Diabetologia. 1979; 16: 151-155
        • Bjerkedal T
        • Bakketeig L
        • Lehman EH
        Percentiles of birth weights of single live births at different gestation periods.
        Acta Paediatr Scand. 1973; 62: 449-457
        • Ott WJ
        • Doyle S
        • Flamm S
        Accurate ultrasonic estimation of fetal weight.
        Am J Perinatol. 1985; 2: 178-182