Advertisement

Eenie, meenie, minie, mo … What do the data really show?

  • Laurence E. Stempel
    Correspondence
    Reprint requests: Laurence E. Stempel, M.D., Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Ohio State University Hospitals. Columbus, Ohio 43210
    Affiliations
    Division of Maternal-Fetal Medicine, the Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, The Ohio State University, College of Medicine Columbus, Ohio USA
    Search for articles by this author
      This paper is only available as a PDF. To read, Please Download here.
      To read this article in full you will need to make a payment

      Purchase one-time access:

      Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online access
      One-time access price info
      • For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
      • For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'

      Subscribe:

      Subscribe to American Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology
      Already a print subscriber? Claim online access
      Already an online subscriber? Sign in
      Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect

      References

        • Casscells W.
        • Schoenberger A.
        • Graboys T.B.
        Interpretation by physicians of clinical laboratory results.
        N. Engl. J. Med. 1978; 299: 999
        • Schwartz W.B.
        • Gorry G.A.
        • Kassirer J.P.
        • Essig A.
        Decision analysis and clinical judgment.
        Am. J. Med. 1973; 55: 459
        • Schwartz W.B.
        Decision analysis: A look at the chief complaints.
        N. Engl. J. Med. 1979; 300: 556
        • McNeil B.J.
        • Keeler E.
        • Adelstein S.J.
        Primer on certain elements of medical decision making.
        N. Engl. J. Med. 1975; 293: 211
        • Lusted L.B.
        Decision-making studies in patient management.
        N. Engl. J. Med. 1971; 284: 416
        • Griner P.F.
        • Mayewski R.J.
        • Mushlin A.I.
        • Greenland P.
        Selection and interpretation of diagnostic tests and procedures.
        Ann. Intern. Med. 1981; 94: 553
        • Galen R.S.
        • Gambino S.R.
        Beyond Normality: The Predictive Value and Efficiency of Medical Diagnoses. John Wiley and Sons, New York1975: 17
        • Galen R.S.
        • Gambino S.R.
        Beyond Normality: The Predictive Value and Efficiency of Medical Diagnoses. John Wiley and Sons, New York1975: 36
        • Galen R.S.
        • Gambino S.R.
        Beyond Normality: The Predictive Value and Efficiency of Medical Diagnoses. John Wiley and Sons, New York1975: 37
        • Galen R.S.
        • Gambino S.R.
        Beyond Normality: The Predictive Value and Efficiency of Medical Diagnoses. John Wiley and Sons, New York1975: 50
        • Galen R.S.
        • Gambino S.R.
        Beyond Normality: The Predictive Value and Efficiency of Medical Diagnoses. John Wiley and Sons, New York1975: 51
        • Galen R.S.
        • Gambino S.R.
        ed. 1. Beyond Normality: The Predictive Value and Efficiency of Medical Diagnoses. John Wiley and Sons, New York1975: 54
        • Chinn D.H.
        • Filly R.A.
        • Callen P.W.
        Prediction of intrauterine growth retardation by sonographic estimation of total intrauterine volume.
        JCU. 1981; 9: 175
        • Gohari P.
        • Hobbins J.C.
        • Berkowitz R.
        Use of hPL in the diagnosis of intrauterine growth retardation.
        Obstet. Gynecol. 1978; 52: 127
        • Vecchio T.J.
        Predictive value of a single diagnostic test in unselected populations.
        N. Engl. J. Med. 1966; 274: 1171
        • Goldberg M.F.
        • Oakley G.P.
        Interpreting elevated amniotic fluid alpha-fetoprotein levels in clinical practice: Use of the predictive value positive concept.
        Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol. 1979; 133: 126
        • Katz M.A.
        A probability graph describing the predictive value of a highly sensitive diagnostic test.
        N. Engl. J. Med. 1974; 291: 1115