This paper is only available as a PDF. To read, Please Download here.
Abstract
The study explores the question whether the increase in low-birth-weight infants to
smoking gravidas is due to the smoking or the smoker. The method was that of investigating the reproductive performance of future smokers
during the periods before they acquired the smoking habit. It was found that women
who subsequently became smokers had a high incidence of low-birth-weight infants also
during the period before they started to smoke. It was concluded that the findings
raise doubt and argue against the proposition that cigarette smoking acts as an exogenous
factor which interferes with the intrauterine development of the fetus. Rather, the
evidence appears to support the hypothesis that the higher incidence of low-birth-weight
infants is due to the smoker, not the smoking.
To read this article in full you will need to make a payment
Purchase one-time access:
Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online accessOne-time access price info
- For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
- For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'
Subscribe:
Subscribe to American Journal of Obstetrics & GynecologyAlready a print subscriber? Claim online access
Already an online subscriber? Sign in
Register: Create an account
Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect
References
- Am. Obstet. Gynecol. 1957; 73: 808
- Lancet. 1962; 1: 771
- Ugeskr. Laeger. 1962; 124: 630
- James G. Rosenthal T. Tobacco and Health. Charles C Thomas, Publisher, Springfield, Illinois1962
- Nebr. State Med. J. 1963; 48: 11
- Nebr. State Med. J. 1963; 48: 604
- N. Z. Med. J. 1964; 63: 601
- Am. J. Epidemiol. 1965; 82: 247
- Obstet. Gynecol. 1965; 26: 470
- Am. J. Public Health. 1966; 56: 626
- Arch. Environ. Health. 1966; 12: 600
- Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol. 1966; 96: 267
- Rev. Obstet. Ginecol. Venez. 1967; 27: 595
- Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol. 1969; 103: 358
- Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol. 1969; 103: 942
- Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol. 1970; 106: 703
- Obstet. Gynecol. 1962; 20: 313
- Obstet. Gynecol. 1963; 22: 181
- Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol. 1965; 91: 270
- Obstet. Gynecol. 1965; 26: 775
- Calif. Med. 1966; 104: 187
- Harefuah. 1965; 69: 37
- Acta Obstet. Gynecol. Scand. 1966; 45: 279
- Br. Med. J. 1959; 2: 673
- Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol. 1961; 81: 988
- Obstet. Gynecol. 1963; 21: 405
- J. Obstet. Gynecol. Br. Commonw. 1966; 73: 742
- Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol. 1967; 98: 708
- Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol. 1968; 101: 844
- Acta Obstet. Gynecol. Scand. 1971; 50: 83
- Obstet. Gynecol. 1967; 29: 1
- Acta Paediatr. Scand. 1969; 193 (Suppl.): 1
- E. & S. Livingstone, Ltd, Edinburgh1969 Perinatal Mortality.
- Am. J. Epidemiol. 1971; 93: 443
- Infant, Perinatal, Maternal and Childhood Mortality in the United States. Harvard University Press, Cambridge1968: 51 ed. 4.
- Frazer F.Clarke Proc. Third Int. Conference on Congenital Malformations. Excerpta Medica Foundation, Amsterdam1970
Article Info
Publication History
Received:
October 4,
1971
Footnotes
☆Supported by Grant No. HD 00718 of the National Institutes of Health.
Identification
Copyright
© 1972 Published by Elsevier Inc.